UFC 277: Pena vs. Nunes 2: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, July 30, 2022·Dallas, Texas, USA
Published April 16, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 277: Pena vs. Nunes 2 lands on Saturday, July 30, 2022 in Dallas, Texas, USA with 13 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Amanda Nunes vs Julianna PenaWomen's BantamweightAmanda NunesStrong79%
Brandon Moreno vs Kai Kara-FranceFlyweightBrandon MorenoConfident68%
Sergei Pavlovich vs Derrick LewisHeavyweightSergei PavlovichLean64%
Alexandre Pantoja vs Alex PerezFlyweightAlexandre PantojaLean55%
Magomed Ankalaev vs Anthony SmithLight HeavyweightMagomed AnkalaevStrong88%
Alex Morono vs Matthew SemelsbergerWelterweightMatthew SemelsbergerLean58%
Drew Dober vs Rafael AlvesLightweightDrew DoberToss-up53%
Don'Tale Mayes vs Hamdy AbdelwahabHeavyweightDon'Tale MayesLean61%
Drakkar Klose vs Rafa GarciaLightweightDrakkar KloseLean55%
Michael Morales vs Adam FugittWelterweightMichael MoralesStrong92%
Joselyne Edwards vs Ji Yeon KimWomen's BantamweightJoselyne EdwardsLean56%
Nicolae Negumereanu vs Ihor PotieriaLight HeavyweightNicolae NegumereanuLean59%
Orion Cosce vs Blood DiamondWelterweightOrion CosceConfident74%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Amanda Nunes vs Julianna Pena

Women's BantamweightTitle Fight
79%
Amanda Nunes
Nunes
16-2
CH-II1707
Wrestler
VS
Pena
8-4
CO-II1453
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 73%
Under 27%Over 73%

The Women's Bantamweight championship matchup features Amanda Nunes (16-2) taking on Julianna Pena (8-4).

Nunes is rated at 1707 — 255 points above Pena's 1453. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nunes throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Nunes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Pena has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Amanda Nunes over Julianna Pena. The model is firm on this one: Nunes at 79%. Notably, the betting market has Nunes at 70% implied while our model sees 79% — a 9-point disagreement that could signal value.

68%
Brandon Moreno
Moreno
11-7-2
CO-II1417
All-Rounder
VS
Kara-France
8-5
CO-II1397
Striker
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Flyweight matchup features Brandon Moreno (11-7-2) taking on Kai Kara-France (8-5). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Moreno.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Moreno at 1417, Kara-France at 1397. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Stylistically this is Moreno's all-rounder game against Kara-France's striker approach. Moreno is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Kara-France brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Kara-France throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Moreno is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Kara-France has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brandon Moreno over Kai Kara-France. We're leaning Moreno here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

64%
Sergei Pavlovich
Pavlovich
8-3
CH-II1794
Striker
VS
Lewis
20-11
CO-I1493
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Heavyweight matchup features Sergei Pavlovich (8-3) taking on Derrick Lewis (20-11). Pavlovich will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

Pavlovich is rated at 1794 — 301 points above Lewis's 1493. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pavlovich throws significantly more leather — a 3.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Lewis is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Pavlovich has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Sergei Pavlovich over Derrick Lewis. The model gives Pavlovich a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Pavlovich at 58% implied while our model sees 64% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.

55%
Alexandre Pantoja
Pantoja
14-4
CO-I1543
Wrestler
VS
Perez
8-6
CO-III1332
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 60%
Under 40%Over 60%

The Flyweight matchup features Alexandre Pantoja (14-4) taking on Alex Perez (8-6).

Pantoja is rated at 1543 — 211 points above Perez's 1332. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Pantoja rides a 8-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Pantoja looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Perez is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, wrestlers own a 55% win rate against submission artists, giving Pantoja the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Perez throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Perez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Perez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alexandre Pantoja over Alex Perez. The model gives Pantoja a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 62% for Pantoja, but our model sees only 55%. That 7-point gap favoring Perez is worth watching.

Magomed Ankalaev vs Anthony Smith

Light Heavyweight
88%
Magomed Ankalaev
Ankalaev
12-2-1
CH-I1890
Striker
VS
Smith
13-12
CO-III1231
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 54%
Under 54%Over 46%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Magomed Ankalaev (12-2-1) taking on Anthony Smith (13-12).

Ankalaev is rated at 1890 — 659 points above Smith's 1231. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Ankalaev rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Ankalaev's striker game against Smith's all-rounder approach. Ankalaev brings a versatile approach, while Smith is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ankalaev throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Ankalaev is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Ankalaev has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Magomed Ankalaev over Anthony Smith. The model is firm on this one: Ankalaev at 88%. Notably, the betting market has Ankalaev at 82% implied while our model sees 88% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.

58%
Matthew Semelsberger
Morono
13-10
RK-III1029
All-Rounder
VS
Semelsberger
5-6
MC-III903
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Welterweight matchup features Alex Morono (13-10) taking on Matthew Semelsberger (5-6). Semelsberger is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Morono at 1029 versus Semelsberger at 903. That 125-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Morono's all-rounder game against Semelsberger's knockout artist approach. Morono is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Semelsberger is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Morono throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Semelsberger is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Semelsberger has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Matthew Semelsberger over Alex Morono. The model gives Semelsberger a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Morono at 39% implied while our model sees 42% — a 4-point disagreement that could signal value.

Drew Dober vs Rafael Alves

Lightweight
53%
Drew Dober
Dober
15-11
CO-III1301
All-Rounder
VS
Alves
1-3
MC-II950
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Lightweight matchup features Drew Dober (15-11) taking on Rafael Alves (1-3).

Dober is rated at 1301 — 351 points above Alves's 950. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dober throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Dober is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Alves has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Drew Dober over Rafael Alves. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Dober at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 64% for Dober, but our model sees only 53%. That 12-point gap favoring Alves is worth watching.

61%
Don'Tale Mayes
Mayes
4-7
MC-III907
Striker
VS
Abdelwahab
2-1
RK-II1112
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Heavyweight matchup features Don'Tale Mayes (4-7) taking on Hamdy Abdelwahab (2-1). Mayes is the bigger frame at 6'6" with a 9-inch reach advantage.

Abdelwahab is rated at 1112 — 205 points above Mayes's 907. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mayes throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Mayes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Abdelwahab has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Don'Tale Mayes over Hamdy Abdelwahab. The model gives Mayes a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

55%
Drakkar Klose
Klose
10-3
CO-I1473
Striker
VS
Garcia
6-4
CO-I1478
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Lightweight matchup features Drakkar Klose (10-3) taking on Rafa Garcia (6-4).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Klose at 1473, Garcia at 1478. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Stylistically this is Klose's striker game against Garcia's wrestler approach. Klose brings a versatile approach, while Garcia looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Klose throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Garcia is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.8 more per 15 minutes. Garcia has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Drakkar Klose over Rafa Garcia. The model gives Klose a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 66% for Klose, but our model sees only 55%. That 10-point gap favoring Garcia is worth watching.

92%
Michael Morales
Morales
7-0
CH-I1971
Striker
VS
Fugitt
2-4
PR-III830
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Welterweight matchup features Michael Morales (7-0) taking on Adam Fugitt (2-4).

Morales is rated at 1971 — 1141 points above Fugitt's 830. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Morales rides a 6-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Morales throws significantly more leather — a 6.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Fugitt is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Fugitt has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Michael Morales over Adam Fugitt. The model is firm on this one: Morales at 92%. Notably, the betting market has Morales at 84% implied while our model sees 92% — a 9-point disagreement that could signal value.

Joselyne Edwards vs Ji Yeon Kim

Women's Bantamweight
56%
Joselyne Edwards
Edwards
8-4
CO-III1320
Wrestler
VS
Kim
3-7
UC-II711
Striker
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Joselyne Edwards (8-4) taking on Ji Yeon Kim (3-7).

Edwards is rated at 1320 — 608 points above Kim's 711. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Edwards rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Edwards's wrestler game against Kim's striker approach. Edwards looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Kim brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Kim throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Edwards is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Kim has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Joselyne Edwards over Ji Yeon Kim. The model gives Edwards a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

59%
Nicolae Negumereanu
Negumereanu
4-2
RK-III1056
Striker
VS
Potieria
2-6
PR-III820
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 56%
Under 56%Over 44%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Nicolae Negumereanu (4-2) taking on Ihor Potieria (2-6). Negumereanu will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Negumereanu is rated at 1056 — 237 points above Potieria's 820. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Negumereanu rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Negumereanu throws significantly more leather — a 3.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Negumereanu is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Potieria has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Nicolae Negumereanu over Ihor Potieria. The model gives Negumereanu a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Negumereanu at 53% implied while our model sees 59% — a 5-point disagreement that could signal value.

Orion Cosce vs Blood Diamond

Welterweight
74%
Orion Cosce
Cosce
1-2
UC-II689
VS
Diamond
0-3
UC-II708
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Welterweight matchup features Orion Cosce (1-2) taking on Blood Diamond (0-3). Diamond will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Cosce at 689, Diamond at 708. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cosce throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Cosce is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.2 more per 15 minutes. Cosce has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Orion Cosce over Blood Diamond. We're leaning Cosce here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Cosce at 64% implied while our model sees 74% — a 10-point disagreement that could signal value.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.