UFC Fight Night: Waterson vs. Hill: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, September 12, 2020·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

UFC Fight Night: Waterson vs. Hill lands on Saturday, September 12, 2020 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 12 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Michelle Waterson-Gomez vs Angela HillWomen's StrawweightAngela HillToss-up53%
Ottman Azaitar vs Khama WorthyLightweightOttman AzaitarLean58%
Roxanne Modafferi vs Andrea LeeWomen's FlyweightAndrea LeeConfident75%
Ed Herman vs Mike RodriguezLight HeavyweightMike RodriguezConfident67%
King Green vs Alan PatrickLightweightKing GreenConfident70%
Billy Quarantillo vs Kyle NelsonFeatherweightBilly QuarantilloConfident67%
Sijara Eubanks vs Julia AvilaWomen's BantamweightJulia AvilaConfident74%
Roosevelt Roberts vs Kevin CroomLightweightRoosevelt RobertsStrong89%
Alexandr Romanov vs Roque MartinezHeavyweightAlexandr RomanovLean64%
Jalin Turner vs Brok WeaverCatch WeightJalin TurnerStrong86%
Bryan Barberena vs Anthony IvyWelterweightBryan BarberenaConfident68%
Sabina Mazo vs Justine KishWomen's FlyweightSabina MazoStrong78%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Michelle Waterson-Gomez vs Angela Hill

Women's StrawweightTitle Fight
53%
Angela Hill
Waterson-Gomez
6-8
Elo 908
All-Rounder
VS
Hill
13-15
Elo 1074
All-Rounder

The Women's Strawweight championship matchup features Michelle Waterson-Gomez (6-8) taking on Angela Hill (13-15).

Hill is rated at 1074 — 166 points above Waterson-Gomez's 908. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hill throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Waterson-Gomez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Hill has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Angela Hill over Michelle Waterson-Gomez.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Hill at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

58%
Ottman Azaitar
Azaitar
2-2
Elo 852
VS
Worthy
2-2
Elo 782

The Lightweight matchup features Ottman Azaitar (2-2) taking on Khama Worthy (2-2). Worthy is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Azaitar carries a modest Elo edge (852 to 782), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Azaitar throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Worthy is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Azaitar has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Ottman Azaitar over Khama Worthy.** The model gives Azaitar a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Azaitar at 46% implied while our model sees 58% — a 13-point disagreement that could signal value.

Roxanne Modafferi vs Andrea Lee

Women's Flyweight
75%
Andrea Lee
Modafferi
4-7
Elo 979
Striker
VS
Lee
5-8
Elo 864
All-Rounder

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Roxanne Modafferi (4-7) taking on Andrea Lee (5-8).

There's a real Elo separation here: Modafferi at 979 versus Lee at 864. That 115-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Modafferi's striker game against Lee's all-rounder approach. Modafferi brings a versatile approach, while Lee is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lee throws significantly more leather — a 3.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Lee is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Lee has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Andrea Lee over Roxanne Modafferi.** We're leaning Lee here at 75%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Ed Herman vs Mike Rodriguez

Light Heavyweight
67%
Mike Rodriguez
Herman
13-11
Elo 1045
All-Rounder
VS
Rodriguez
2-4
Elo 810
Striker

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Ed Herman (13-11) taking on Mike Rodriguez (2-4). Rodriguez is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Herman is rated at 1045 — 235 points above Rodriguez's 810. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Herman's all-rounder game against Rodriguez's striker approach. Herman is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Rodriguez brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rodriguez throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Herman is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Herman has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Mike Rodriguez over Ed Herman.** We're leaning Rodriguez here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

King Green vs Alan Patrick

Lightweight
70%
King Green
Green
13-12-1
Elo 1176
Knockout Artist
VS
Patrick
5-3
Elo 863
Wrestler

The Lightweight matchup features King Green (13-12-1) taking on Alan Patrick (5-3). Patrick will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Green is rated at 1176 — 313 points above Patrick's 863. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Green is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Patrick looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Patrick the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Green throws significantly more leather — a 4.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Patrick is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Green has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: King Green over Alan Patrick.** We're leaning Green here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

67%
Billy Quarantillo
Quarantillo
6-4
Elo 965
All-Rounder
VS
Nelson
4-5-1
Elo 1271
Striker

The Featherweight matchup features Billy Quarantillo (6-4) taking on Kyle Nelson (4-5-1).

Nelson is rated at 1271 — 305 points above Quarantillo's 965. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Quarantillo's all-rounder game against Nelson's striker approach. Quarantillo is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Nelson brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Quarantillo throws significantly more leather — a 2.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Quarantillo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Nelson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Billy Quarantillo over Kyle Nelson.** We're leaning Quarantillo here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market implies 72% for Quarantillo, but our model sees only 67%. That 4-point gap favoring Nelson is worth watching.

Sijara Eubanks vs Julia Avila

Women's Bantamweight
74%
Julia Avila
Eubanks
5-4
Elo 974
Wrestler
VS
Avila
3-2
Elo 933
All-Rounder

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Sijara Eubanks (5-4) taking on Julia Avila (3-2). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Avila.

Eubanks carries a modest Elo edge (974 to 933), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Eubanks's striker game against Avila's all-rounder approach. Eubanks brings a versatile approach, while Avila is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Eubanks throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Eubanks is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Eubanks has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Julia Avila over Sijara Eubanks.** We're leaning Avila here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

89%
Roosevelt Roberts
Roberts
4-4
Elo 885
Wrestler
VS
Croom
0-2
Elo 848

The Lightweight matchup features Roosevelt Roberts (4-4) taking on Kevin Croom (0-2). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Roberts.

Roberts carries a modest Elo edge (885 to 848), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Roberts throws significantly more leather — a 2.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Roberts is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Croom has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Roosevelt Roberts over Kevin Croom.** The model is firm on this one: Roberts at 89%. Notably, the betting market has Roberts at 80% implied while our model sees 89% — a 10-point disagreement that could signal value.

64%
Alexandr Romanov
Romanov
6-3
Elo 1307
Wrestler
VS
Martinez
0-2
Elo 742

The Heavyweight matchup features Alexandr Romanov (6-3) taking on Roque Martinez (0-2). Romanov is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Romanov is rated at 1307 — 566 points above Martinez's 742. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Martinez throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Martinez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Martinez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Alexandr Romanov over Roque Martinez.** The model gives Romanov a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

Jalin Turner vs Brok Weaver

Catch Weight
86%
Jalin Turner
Turner
7-6
Elo 1393
All-Rounder
VS
Weaver
1-1
Elo 884

The Catch Weight matchup features Jalin Turner (7-6) taking on Brok Weaver (1-1). Turner is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Turner is rated at 1393 — 508 points above Weaver's 884. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Turner throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Weaver is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Turner has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Jalin Turner over Brok Weaver.** The model is firm on this one: Turner at 86%. Notably, the betting market has Turner at 78% implied while our model sees 86% — a 7-point disagreement that could signal value.

68%
Bryan Barberena
Barberena
9-9
Elo 960
All-Rounder
VS
Ivy
0-1
Elo 823

The Welterweight matchup features Bryan Barberena (9-9) taking on Anthony Ivy (0-1). Ivy is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Barberena at 960 versus Ivy at 823. That 137-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Barberena throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Ivy is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Ivy has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Bryan Barberena over Anthony Ivy.** We're leaning Barberena here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Sabina Mazo vs Justine Kish

Women's Flyweight
78%
Sabina Mazo
Mazo
3-3
Elo 804
All-Rounder
VS
Kish
3-3
Elo 900
All-Rounder

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Sabina Mazo (3-3) taking on Justine Kish (3-3). Mazo is the bigger frame at 5'7" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Kish at 900 versus Mazo at 804. That 96-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mazo throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Mazo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Mazo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Sabina Mazo over Justine Kish.** The model is firm on this one: Mazo at 78%. Notably, the betting market has Mazo at 68% implied while our model sees 78% — a 10-point disagreement that could signal value.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.