UFC 207: Nunes vs. Rousey: Predictions & Analysis

Friday, December 30, 2016·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published April 18, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 207: Nunes vs. Rousey lands on Friday, December 30, 2016 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 10 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Amanda Nunes vs Ronda RouseyWomen's BantamweightAmanda NunesStrong79%
Cody Garbrandt vs Dominick CruzBantamweightCody GarbrandtLean55%
TJ Dillashaw vs John LinekerBantamweightTJ DillashawToss-up53%
Dong Hyun Kim vs Tarec SaffiedineWelterweightDong Hyun KimLean63%
Ray Borg vs Louis SmolkaFlyweightLouis SmolkaToss-up52%
Neil Magny vs Johny HendricksWelterweightNeil MagnyConfident74%
Antonio Carlos Junior vs Marvin VettoriMiddleweightMarvin VettoriLean56%
Alex Garcia vs Mike PyleWelterweightAlex GarciaLean62%
Niko Price vs Brandon ThatchWelterweightBrandon ThatchToss-up51%
Alex Oliveira vs Tim MeansWelterweightAlex OliveiraLean64%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Amanda Nunes vs Ronda Rousey

Women's Bantamweight
79%
Amanda Nunes
Nunes
16-2
CH-II1707
Wrestler
VS
Rousey
6-2
CO-III1307
Submission Artist
Over/UnderOver 63%
Under 37%Over 63%

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Amanda Nunes (16-2) taking on Ronda Rousey (6-2). Nunes will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Nunes is rated at 1707 — 401 points above Rousey's 1307. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Nunes's knockout artist game against Rousey's submission artist approach. Nunes is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Rousey is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rousey throws significantly more leather — a 3.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Rousey is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Nunes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Amanda Nunes over Ronda Rousey. The model is firm on this one: Nunes at 79%.

Cody Garbrandt vs Dominick Cruz

BantamweightTitle Fight
55%
Cody Garbrandt
Garbrandt
10-7
CO-III1313
Striker
VS
Cruz
7-3
CO-I1552
Striker
Over/UnderOver 69%
Under 31%Over 69%

The Bantamweight championship matchup features Cody Garbrandt (10-7) taking on Dominick Cruz (7-3). Cruz will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Cruz is rated at 1552 — 239 points above Garbrandt's 1313. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Garbrandt's striker game against Cruz's wrestler approach. Garbrandt brings a versatile approach, while Cruz looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Garbrandt throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Cruz is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.8 more per 15 minutes. Cruz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Cody Garbrandt over Dominick Cruz. The model gives Garbrandt a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

TJ Dillashaw vs John Lineker

Bantamweight
53%
TJ Dillashaw
Dillashaw
13-5
CH-III1691
All-Rounder
VS
Lineker
12-4
CO-I1549
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 60%
Under 40%Over 60%

The Bantamweight matchup features TJ Dillashaw (13-5) taking on John Lineker (12-4). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Dillashaw.

There's a real Elo separation here: Dillashaw at 1691 versus Lineker at 1549. That 142-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Dillashaw's all-rounder game against Lineker's knockout artist approach. Dillashaw is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Lineker is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dillashaw throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Dillashaw is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Dillashaw has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: TJ Dillashaw over John Lineker. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Dillashaw at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

63%
Dong Hyun Kim
Kim
13-4
CO-I1471
All-Rounder
VS
Saffiedine
2-4
CO-III1218
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 62%
Under 38%Over 62%

The Welterweight matchup features Dong Hyun Kim (13-4) taking on Tarec Saffiedine (2-4). Kim is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Kim is rated at 1471 — 253 points above Saffiedine's 1218. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Kim rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Kim's knockout artist game against Saffiedine's all-rounder approach. Kim is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Saffiedine is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Saffiedine throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Kim is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Kim has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dong Hyun Kim over Tarec Saffiedine. The model gives Kim a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

52%
Louis Smolka
Borg
7-5
CO-III1255
Wrestler
VS
Smolka
8-9
MC-II951
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Flyweight matchup features Ray Borg (7-5) taking on Louis Smolka (8-9). Smolka is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Borg is rated at 1255 — 303 points above Smolka's 951. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Borg looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Smolka is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, wrestlers own a 55% win rate against submission artists, giving Borg the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Smolka throws significantly more leather — a 3.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Borg is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Borg has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Louis Smolka over Ray Borg. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Smolka at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

74%
Neil Magny
Magny
24-13
CO-II1418
Wrestler
VS
Hendricks
13-8
CO-III1254
Striker
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Welterweight matchup features Neil Magny (24-13) taking on Johny Hendricks (13-8). Magny is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 11-inch reach advantage.

Magny is rated at 1418 — 164 points above Hendricks's 1254. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Magny looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Hendricks is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Magny the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hendricks throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Hendricks is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Hendricks has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Neil Magny over Johny Hendricks. We're leaning Magny here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

56%
Marvin Vettori
Junior
7-5
CO-III1225
Wrestler
VS
Vettori
9-8-1
CO-II1429
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 61%
Under 61%Over 39%

The Middleweight matchup features Antonio Carlos Junior (7-5) taking on Marvin Vettori (9-8-1). Junior is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Vettori is rated at 1429 — 204 points above Junior's 1225. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Junior looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Vettori is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Junior the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Vettori throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Junior is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Vettori has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Marvin Vettori over Antonio Carlos Junior. The model gives Vettori a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

Alex Garcia vs Mike Pyle

Welterweight
62%
Alex Garcia
Garcia
5-5
RK-II1080
Wrestler
VS
Pyle
10-9
MC-II967
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Welterweight matchup features Alex Garcia (5-5) taking on Mike Pyle (10-9). Pyle is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Garcia at 1080 versus Pyle at 967. That 114-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Garcia's striker game against Pyle's wrestler approach. Garcia brings a versatile approach, while Pyle looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pyle throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Garcia is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.3 more per 15 minutes. Pyle has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alex Garcia over Mike Pyle. The model gives Garcia a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

Niko Price vs Brandon Thatch

Welterweight
51%
Brandon Thatch
Price
8-11
MC-I975
All-Rounder
VS
Thatch
2-4
MC-III908
Striker
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Welterweight matchup features Niko Price (8-11) taking on Brandon Thatch (2-4).

Price carries a modest Elo edge (975 to 908), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Price's all-rounder game against Thatch's striker approach. Price is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Thatch brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Thatch throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Thatch is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Price has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brandon Thatch over Niko Price. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Thatch at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Alex Oliveira vs Tim Means

Welterweight
64%
Alex Oliveira
Oliveira
11-10
RK-II1099
All-Rounder
VS
Means
15-14
RK-III1042
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Welterweight matchup features Alex Oliveira (11-10) taking on Tim Means (15-14). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Means.

Oliveira carries a modest Elo edge (1099 to 1042), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Oliveira's wrestler game against Means's knockout artist approach. Oliveira looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Means is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Means throws significantly more leather — a 2.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Oliveira is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Means has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alex Oliveira over Tim Means. The model gives Oliveira a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.