The Ultimate Fighter: Tournament of Champions Finale: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, December 3, 2016·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

The Ultimate Fighter: Tournament of Champions Finale lands on Saturday, December 3, 2016 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 12 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Demetrious Johnson vs Tim ElliottFlyweightDemetrious JohnsonStrong92%
Joseph Benavidez vs Henry CejudoFlyweightHenry CejudoLean57%
Jorge Masvidal vs Jake EllenbergerWelterweightJorge MasvidalConfident65%
Jared Cannonier vs Ion CutelabaLight HeavyweightIon CutelabaConfident72%
Sara McMann vs Alexis DavisWomen's BantamweightSara McMannConfident69%
Brandon Moreno vs Ryan BenoitFlyweightRyan BenoitLean57%
Ryan Hall vs Gray MaynardFeatherweightRyan HallLean62%
Rob Font vs Matt SchnellBantamweightRob FontLean62%
Dong Hyun Ma vs Brendan O'ReillyLightweightDong Hyun MaToss-up54%
Jamie Moyle vs Kailin CurranWomen's StrawweightKailin CurranLean55%
Anthony Smith vs Elvis MutapcicMiddleweightAnthony SmithLean60%
Devin Clark vs Josh StansburyLight HeavyweightJosh StansburyConfident70%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Demetrious Johnson vs Tim Elliott

FlyweightTitle Fight
92%
Demetrious Johnson
Johnson
15-1-1
Elo 1603
Wrestler
VS
Elliott
9-11
Elo 1241
Wrestler

The Flyweight championship matchup features Demetrious Johnson (15-1-1) taking on Tim Elliott (9-11). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Elliott.

Johnson is rated at 1603 — 362 points above Elliott's 1241. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Johnson rides a 13-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Elliott throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Elliott is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Elliott has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Demetrious Johnson over Tim Elliott. The model is firm on this one: Johnson at 92%. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

57%
Henry Cejudo
Benavidez
15-5
Elo 1291
Wrestler
VS
Cejudo
10-5
Elo 1416
All-Rounder

The Flyweight matchup features Joseph Benavidez (15-5) taking on Henry Cejudo (10-5).

There's a real Elo separation here: Cejudo at 1416 versus Benavidez at 1291. That 124-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Benavidez throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Cejudo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Cejudo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Henry Cejudo over Joseph Benavidez. The model gives Cejudo a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 64% for Benavidez, but our model sees only 43%. That 21-point gap favoring Cejudo is worth watching.

65%
Jorge Masvidal
Masvidal
12-9
Elo 1579
Knockout Artist
VS
Ellenberger
10-10
Elo 847
All-Rounder

The Welterweight matchup features Jorge Masvidal (12-9) taking on Jake Ellenberger (10-10). Masvidal is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Masvidal is rated at 1579 — 732 points above Ellenberger's 847. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Masvidal throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Masvidal is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Ellenberger has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jorge Masvidal over Jake Ellenberger. We're leaning Masvidal here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Jared Cannonier vs Ion Cutelaba

Light Heavyweight
72%
Ion Cutelaba
Cannonier
11-8
Elo 1426
Striker
VS
Cutelaba
8-9-1
Elo 1147
Wrestler

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Jared Cannonier (11-8) taking on Ion Cutelaba (8-9-1).

Cannonier is rated at 1426 — 280 points above Cutelaba's 1147. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Cannonier's striker game against Cutelaba's wrestler approach. Cannonier brings a versatile approach, while Cutelaba looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cannonier throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Cutelaba is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Cannonier has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ion Cutelaba over Jared Cannonier. We're leaning Cutelaba here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market implies 34% for Cannonier, but our model sees only 28%. That 6-point gap favoring Cutelaba is worth watching.

Sara McMann vs Alexis Davis

Women's Bantamweight
69%
Sara McMann
McMann
6-6
Elo 1158
Wrestler
VS
Davis
7-6
Elo 1030
All-Rounder

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Sara McMann (6-6) taking on Alexis Davis (7-6).

There's a real Elo separation here: McMann at 1158 versus Davis at 1030. That 129-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Davis throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. McMann is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Davis has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Sara McMann over Alexis Davis. We're leaning McMann here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has McMann at 63% implied while our model sees 69% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.

57%
Ryan Benoit
Moreno
11-5-2
Elo 1410
All-Rounder
VS
Benoit
3-5
Elo 810
All-Rounder

The Flyweight matchup features Brandon Moreno (11-5-2) taking on Ryan Benoit (3-5). Moreno is the bigger frame at 5'7" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Moreno is rated at 1410 — 599 points above Benoit's 810. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Moreno throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Moreno is far more active with takedowns, averaging 5.8 more per 15 minutes. Benoit has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ryan Benoit over Brandon Moreno. The model gives Benoit a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 52% for Moreno, but our model sees only 43%. That 9-point gap favoring Benoit is worth watching.

Ryan Hall vs Gray Maynard

Featherweight
62%
Ryan Hall
Hall
4-1
Elo 1214
All-Rounder
VS
Maynard
11-6-1
Elo 975
Wrestler

The Featherweight matchup features Ryan Hall (4-1) taking on Gray Maynard (11-6-1).

Hall is rated at 1214 — 240 points above Maynard's 975. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Hall is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Maynard looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Maynard the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Maynard throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Maynard is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Hall has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ryan Hall over Gray Maynard. The model gives Hall a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Hall at 47% implied while our model sees 62% — a 14-point disagreement that could signal value.

Rob Font vs Matt Schnell

Bantamweight
62%
Rob Font
Font
12-7
Elo 1361
All-Rounder
VS
Schnell
7-7
Elo 899
Wrestler

The Bantamweight matchup features Rob Font (12-7) taking on Matt Schnell (7-7).

Font is rated at 1361 — 462 points above Schnell's 899. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Font is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Schnell looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Schnell the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Font throws significantly more leather — a 3.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Font is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Schnell has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rob Font over Matt Schnell. The model gives Font a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 68% for Font, but our model sees only 62%. That 6-point gap favoring Schnell is worth watching.

54%
Dong Hyun Ma
Ma
3-4
Elo 838
Striker
VS
O'Reilly
1-2
Elo 802

The Lightweight matchup features Dong Hyun Ma (3-4) taking on Brendan O'Reilly (1-2). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Ma.

Ma carries a modest Elo edge (838 to 802), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ma throws significantly more leather — a 2.5 sig. strike per minute gap. O'Reilly is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Ma has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dong Hyun Ma over Brendan O'Reilly. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Ma at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Jamie Moyle vs Kailin Curran

Women's Strawweight
55%
Kailin Curran
Moyle
1-1
Elo 864
VS
Curran
1-5
Elo 736
Wrestler

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Jamie Moyle (1-1) taking on Kailin Curran (1-5). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Curran.

There's a real Elo separation here: Moyle at 864 versus Curran at 736. That 129-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Curran throws significantly more leather — a 3.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Curran is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.2 more per 15 minutes. Moyle has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kailin Curran over Jamie Moyle. The model gives Curran a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Moyle at 42% implied while our model sees 45% — a 3-point disagreement that could signal value.

60%
Anthony Smith
Smith
13-11
Elo 1070
All-Rounder
VS
Mutapcic
0-1-1
Elo 808

The Middleweight matchup features Anthony Smith (13-11) taking on Elvis Mutapcic (0-1-1). Smith is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Smith is rated at 1070 — 262 points above Mutapcic's 808. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mutapcic throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Smith is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Smith has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Anthony Smith over Elvis Mutapcic. The model gives Smith a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Smith at 52% implied while our model sees 60% — a 9-point disagreement that could signal value.

Devin Clark vs Josh Stansbury

Light Heavyweight
70%
Josh Stansbury
Clark
8-8
Elo 944
Striker
VS
Stansbury
1-1
Elo 792

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Devin Clark (8-8) taking on Josh Stansbury (1-1).

Clark is rated at 944 — 152 points above Stansbury's 792. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Stansbury throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Clark is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.0 more per 15 minutes. Stansbury has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Josh Stansbury over Devin Clark. We're leaning Stansbury here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market implies 48% for Clark, but our model sees only 30%. That 18-point gap favoring Stansbury is worth watching.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.

The Ultimate Fighter: Tournament of Champions Finale Predictions & Analysis | Haymaker