UFC Fight Night: Whittaker vs. Brunson: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, November 26, 2016·Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Published April 16, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Whittaker vs. Brunson lands on Saturday, November 26, 2016 in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia with 13 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Robert Whittaker vs Derek BrunsonMiddleweightDerek BrunsonToss-up54%
Andrew Holbrook vs Jake MatthewsLightweightJake MatthewsConfident75%
Omari Akhmedov vs Kyle NokeWelterweightOmari AkhmedovLean61%
Alexander Volkanovski vs Yusuke KasuyaLightweightYusuke KasuyaLean58%
Tyson Pedro vs Khalil Rountree Jr.Light HeavyweightTyson PedroLean57%
Danielle Taylor vs Seo Hee HamWomen's StrawweightDanielle TaylorToss-up52%
Daniel Kelly vs Chris CamozziMiddleweightChris CamozziLean64%
Damien Brown vs Jon TuckLightweightDamien BrownToss-up52%
Jonathan Meunier vs Richard WalshWelterweightRichard WalshLean56%
Ben Nguyen vs Geane HerreraFlyweightBen NguyenLean63%
Jason Knight vs Dan HookerFeatherweightJason KnightLean57%
Marlon Vera vs Guangyou NingFeatherweightMarlon VeraLean55%
Jenel Lausa vs Yao ZhikuiFlyweightYao ZhikuiToss-up53%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

54%
Derek Brunson
Whittaker
17-7
CH-II1722
Striker
VS
Brunson
14-7
CO-I1563
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 59%
Under 59%Over 41%

The Middleweight matchup features Robert Whittaker (17-7) taking on Derek Brunson (14-7). Brunson will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Whittaker is rated at 1722 — 159 points above Brunson's 1563. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Whittaker brings a versatile approach, while Brunson is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Brunson the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Whittaker throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Brunson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Brunson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Derek Brunson over Robert Whittaker. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Brunson at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

75%
Jake Matthews
Holbrook
2-3
UC-I738
VS
Matthews
15-8
CO-II1398
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Lightweight matchup features Andrew Holbrook (2-3) taking on Jake Matthews (15-8). Matthews will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Matthews is rated at 1398 — 660 points above Holbrook's 738. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Matthews has won 3 straight.

A few statistical edges stand out. Matthews throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Matthews is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Matthews has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jake Matthews over Andrew Holbrook. We're leaning Matthews here at 75%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Holbrook at 20% implied while our model sees 25% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.

Omari Akhmedov vs Kyle Noke

Welterweight
61%
Omari Akhmedov
Akhmedov
9-5-1
CO-II1411
All-Rounder
VS
Noke
6-6
MC-II942
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 63%
Under 37%Over 63%

The Welterweight matchup features Omari Akhmedov (9-5-1) taking on Kyle Noke (6-6). Noke will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Akhmedov is rated at 1411 — 469 points above Noke's 942. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Akhmedov looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Noke is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Akhmedov the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Noke throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Akhmedov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Noke has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Omari Akhmedov over Kyle Noke. The model gives Akhmedov a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

58%
Yusuke Kasuya
Volkanovski
15-3
CH-I1939
Striker
VS
Kasuya
0-2
UC-I773
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Lightweight matchup features Alexander Volkanovski (15-3) taking on Yusuke Kasuya (0-2).

Volkanovski is rated at 1939 — 1166 points above Kasuya's 773. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Kasuya throws significantly more leather — a 2.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Kasuya is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Volkanovski has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Yusuke Kasuya over Alexander Volkanovski. The model gives Kasuya a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Tyson Pedro vs Khalil Rountree Jr.

Light Heavyweight
57%
Tyson Pedro
Pedro
6-5
RK-III1033
Knockout Artist
VS
Jr.
10-7
CO-I1559
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 55%
Under 55%Over 45%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Tyson Pedro (6-5) taking on Khalil Rountree Jr. (10-7). Pedro is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Jr. is rated at 1559 — 526 points above Pedro's 1033. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Pedro is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Jr. brings a versatile approach. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Pedro the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jr. throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Jr. is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Pedro has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tyson Pedro over Khalil Rountree Jr.. The model gives Pedro a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

Danielle Taylor vs Seo Hee Ham

Women's Strawweight
52%
Danielle Taylor
Taylor
2-3
PR-I871
VS
Ham
1-3
UC-I791
Over/UnderOver 65%
Under 35%Over 65%

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Danielle Taylor (2-3) taking on Seo Hee Ham (1-3). Ham is the bigger frame at 5'2" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Taylor at 871 versus Ham at 791. That 80-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ham throws significantly more leather — a 3.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Taylor is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Taylor has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Danielle Taylor over Seo Hee Ham. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Taylor at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Taylor at 47% implied while our model sees 52% — a 5-point disagreement that could signal value.

64%
Chris Camozzi
Kelly
6-4
RK-II1127
All-Rounder
VS
Camozzi
9-10
RK-III1038
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 56%
Under 56%Over 44%

The Middleweight matchup features Daniel Kelly (6-4) taking on Chris Camozzi (9-10). Camozzi is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Kelly at 1127 versus Camozzi at 1038. That 89-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Kelly throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Kelly is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Kelly has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chris Camozzi over Daniel Kelly. The model gives Camozzi a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Kelly at 33% implied while our model sees 36% — a 3-point disagreement that could signal value.

Damien Brown vs Jon Tuck

Lightweight
52%
Damien Brown
Brown
2-4
PR-II853
All-Rounder
VS
Tuck
4-5
RK-III1041
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Lightweight matchup features Damien Brown (2-4) taking on Jon Tuck (4-5). Tuck will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

Tuck is rated at 1041 — 188 points above Brown's 853. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Tuck throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Brown is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Tuck has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Damien Brown over Jon Tuck. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Brown at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Brown at 45% implied while our model sees 52% — a 7-point disagreement that could signal value.

56%
Richard Walsh
Meunier
1-1
RK-II1071
VS
Walsh
2-4
PR-II853
Striker
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Welterweight matchup features Jonathan Meunier (1-1) taking on Richard Walsh (2-4).

Meunier is rated at 1071 — 218 points above Walsh's 853. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Walsh throws significantly more leather — a 3.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Walsh is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Walsh has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Richard Walsh over Jonathan Meunier. The model gives Walsh a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 48% for Meunier, but our model sees only 44%. That 5-point gap favoring Walsh is worth watching.

63%
Ben Nguyen
Nguyen
4-3
RK-II1099
Wrestler
VS
Herrera
1-3
MC-I992
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Flyweight matchup features Ben Nguyen (4-3) taking on Geane Herrera (1-3).

There's a real Elo separation here: Nguyen at 1099 versus Herrera at 992. That 107-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nguyen throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Herrera is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Herrera has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ben Nguyen over Geane Herrera. The model gives Nguyen a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Nguyen at 52% implied while our model sees 63% — a 11-point disagreement that could signal value.

Jason Knight vs Dan Hooker

Featherweight
57%
Jason Knight
Knight
4-5
RK-III1056
Knockout Artist
VS
Hooker
14-10
CO-I1533
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Featherweight matchup features Jason Knight (4-5) taking on Dan Hooker (14-10). Hooker is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Hooker is rated at 1533 — 477 points above Knight's 1056. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Knight's knockout artist game against Hooker's all-rounder approach. Knight is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Hooker is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hooker throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Knight is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Hooker has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jason Knight over Dan Hooker. The model gives Knight a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

Marlon Vera vs Guangyou Ning

Featherweight
55%
Marlon Vera
Vera
15-11
CO-I1489
All-Rounder
VS
Ning
2-2
MC-I974
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Featherweight matchup features Marlon Vera (15-11) taking on Guangyou Ning (2-2). Vera is the bigger frame at 5'8" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Vera is rated at 1489 — 515 points above Ning's 974. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ning throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Ning is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Ning has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Marlon Vera over Guangyou Ning. The model gives Vera a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

53%
Yao Zhikui
Lausa
1-3
UC-II715
VS
Zhikui
1-3
PR-III818
Over/UnderOver 64%
Under 36%Over 64%

The Flyweight matchup features Jenel Lausa (1-3) taking on Yao Zhikui (1-3). Lausa will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Zhikui at 818 versus Lausa at 715. That 103-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Zhikui throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Zhikui is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Lausa has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Yao Zhikui over Jenel Lausa. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Zhikui at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.