UFC Fight Night: Barnett vs Nelson: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, September 26, 2015·Saitama, Japan
Published April 18, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Barnett vs Nelson lands on Saturday, September 26, 2015 in Saitama, Japan with 10 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Josh Barnett vs Roy NelsonHeavyweightJosh BarnettConfident72%
Uriah Hall vs Gegard MousasiMiddleweightGegard MousasiConfident67%
Kyoji Horiguchi vs Chico CamusFlyweightKyoji HoriguchiStrong86%
Takeya Mizugaki vs George RoopBantamweightTakeya MizugakiConfident69%
Diego Brandao vs Katsunori KikunoFeatherweightDiego BrandaoConfident70%
Mizuto Hirota vs Teruto IshiharaFeatherweightMizuto HirotaToss-up54%
Keita Nakamura vs Li JingliangWelterweightLi JingliangConfident73%
Nick Hein vs Yusuke KasuyaLightweightNick HeinStrong86%
Kajan Johnson vs Naoyuki KotaniLightweightKajan JohnsonStrong88%
Shinsho Anzai vs Roger ZapataWelterweightRoger ZapataLean56%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Josh Barnett vs Roy Nelson

HeavyweightTitle Fight
72%
Josh Barnett
Barnett
7-3
CO-I1573
All-Rounder
VS
Nelson
9-10
CO-III1242
Striker
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Heavyweight championship matchup features Josh Barnett (7-3) taking on Roy Nelson (9-10). Barnett is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Barnett is rated at 1573 — 331 points above Nelson's 1242. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Barnett is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Nelson brings a versatile approach. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Barnett the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Barnett throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Barnett is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Nelson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Josh Barnett over Roy Nelson. We're leaning Barnett here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Uriah Hall vs Gegard Mousasi

Middleweight
67%
Gegard Mousasi
Hall
10-9
CO-I1504
Striker
VS
Mousasi
9-3
CH-I1837
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 53%
Under 53%Over 47%

The Middleweight matchup features Uriah Hall (10-9) taking on Gegard Mousasi (9-3). Hall will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Mousasi is rated at 1837 — 333 points above Hall's 1504. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Mousasi has won 4 straight.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hall throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Hall is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Mousasi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Gegard Mousasi over Uriah Hall. We're leaning Mousasi here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

86%
Kyoji Horiguchi
Horiguchi
9-1
CO-I1584
All-Rounder
VS
Camus
3-4
MC-I977
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 63%
Under 37%Over 63%

The Flyweight matchup features Kyoji Horiguchi (9-1) taking on Chico Camus (3-4). Camus is the bigger frame at 5'6" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Horiguchi is rated at 1584 — 608 points above Camus's 977. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Horiguchi rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Horiguchi's striker game against Camus's all-rounder approach. Horiguchi brings a versatile approach, while Camus is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Horiguchi throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Horiguchi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Camus has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kyoji Horiguchi over Chico Camus. The model is firm on this one: Horiguchi at 86%. Notably, the betting market has Horiguchi at 78% implied while our model sees 86% — a 8-point disagreement that could signal value.

69%
Takeya Mizugaki
Mizugaki
8-6
RK-II1108
Striker
VS
Roop
5-8
MC-II961
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Bantamweight matchup features Takeya Mizugaki (8-6) taking on George Roop (5-8). Roop is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Mizugaki at 1108 versus Roop at 961. That 147-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mizugaki throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Roop is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Roop has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Takeya Mizugaki over George Roop. We're leaning Mizugaki here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

70%
Diego Brandao
Brandao
6-4
CO-III1206
Submission Artist
VS
Kikuno
2-3
MC-I993
Over/UnderOver 63%
Under 37%Over 63%

The Featherweight matchup features Diego Brandao (6-4) taking on Katsunori Kikuno (2-3).

Brandao is rated at 1206 — 212 points above Kikuno's 993. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Kikuno throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Brandao is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.9 more per 15 minutes. Kikuno has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Diego Brandao over Katsunori Kikuno. We're leaning Brandao here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

54%
Mizuto Hirota
Hirota
1-5-1
PR-III823
Striker
VS
Ishihara
3-5-1
PR-II847
Striker
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Featherweight matchup features Mizuto Hirota (1-5-1) taking on Teruto Ishihara (3-5-1).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Hirota at 823, Ishihara at 847. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hirota throws significantly more leather — a 3.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Hirota is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Ishihara has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mizuto Hirota over Teruto Ishihara. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Hirota at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 72% for Hirota, but our model sees only 54%. That 19-point gap favoring Ishihara is worth watching.

73%
Li Jingliang
Nakamura
4-7
RK-III1039
Wrestler
VS
Jingliang
11-7
CO-II1397
Striker
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Welterweight matchup features Keita Nakamura (4-7) taking on Li Jingliang (11-7).

Jingliang is rated at 1397 — 358 points above Nakamura's 1039. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Nakamura's wrestler game against Jingliang's striker approach. Nakamura looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Jingliang brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jingliang throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Nakamura is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Nakamura has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Li Jingliang over Keita Nakamura. We're leaning Jingliang here at 73%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Nick Hein vs Yusuke Kasuya

Lightweight
86%
Nick Hein
Hein
4-4
PR-II845
Striker
VS
Kasuya
0-2
UC-I773
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Lightweight matchup features Nick Hein (4-4) taking on Yusuke Kasuya (0-2).

Hein carries a modest Elo edge (845 to 773), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hein throws significantly more leather — a 2.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Hein is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Kasuya has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Nick Hein over Yusuke Kasuya. The model is firm on this one: Hein at 86%. Notably, the betting market has Hein at 76% implied while our model sees 86% — a 9-point disagreement that could signal value.

88%
Kajan Johnson
Johnson
4-3
CO-III1280
All-Rounder
VS
Kotani
0-5
UC-III595
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Lightweight matchup features Kajan Johnson (4-3) taking on Naoyuki Kotani (0-5). Johnson is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 9-inch reach advantage.

Johnson is rated at 1280 — 685 points above Kotani's 595. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Johnson throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Johnson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.1 more per 15 minutes. Johnson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kajan Johnson over Naoyuki Kotani. The model is firm on this one: Johnson at 88%. Notably, the betting market has Johnson at 73% implied while our model sees 88% — a 14-point disagreement that could signal value.

56%
Roger Zapata
Anzai
2-2
RK-II1091
VS
Zapata
0-1
UC-II713
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Welterweight matchup features Shinsho Anzai (2-2) taking on Roger Zapata (0-1).

Anzai is rated at 1091 — 378 points above Zapata's 713. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Anzai throws significantly more leather — a 7.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Anzai is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.5 more per 15 minutes. Zapata has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Roger Zapata over Shinsho Anzai. The model gives Zapata a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 51% for Anzai, but our model sees only 44%. That 7-point gap favoring Zapata is worth watching.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.