UFC Fight Night: Teixeira vs Saint Preux: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, August 8, 2015·Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Published April 17, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Teixeira vs Saint Preux lands on Saturday, August 8, 2015 in Nashville, Tennessee, USA with 13 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Glover Teixeira vs Ovince Saint PreuxLight HeavyweightOvince Saint PreuxLean61%
Beneil Dariush vs Michael JohnsonLightweightMichael JohnsonToss-up52%
Derek Brunson vs Sam AlveyMiddleweightDerek BrunsonStrong85%
Jared Rosholt vs Timothy JohnsonHeavyweightJared RosholtStrong76%
Amanda Nunes vs Sara McMannWomen's BantamweightAmanda NunesToss-up54%
Ray Borg vs Geane HerreraFlyweightRay BorgStrong83%
Uriah Hall vs Oluwale BamgboseMiddleweightUriah HallStrong75%
Chris Camozzi vs Tom WatsonMiddleweightChris CamozziConfident68%
Dustin Ortiz vs Willie GatesFlyweightDustin OrtizStrong82%
Frankie Saenz vs Sirwan KakaiBantamweightFrankie SaenzLean63%
Jonathan Wilson vs Chris DempseyLight HeavyweightChris DempseyToss-up54%
Marlon Vera vs Roman SalazarBantamweightMarlon VeraLean58%
Scott Holtzman vs Anthony ChristodoulouLightweightScott HoltzmanStrong88%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

61%
Ovince Saint Preux
Teixeira
16-7
CH-III1677
Wrestler
VS
Preux
15-13
RK-III1056
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 53%
Under 53%Over 47%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Glover Teixeira (16-7) taking on Ovince Saint Preux (15-13). Preux will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Teixeira is rated at 1677 — 621 points above Preux's 1056. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Teixeira throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Preux is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Preux has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ovince Saint Preux over Glover Teixeira. The model gives Preux a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

52%
Michael Johnson
Dariush
17-7-1
CO-I1557
All-Rounder
VS
Johnson
16-16
RK-I1155
Striker
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Lightweight matchup features Beneil Dariush (17-7-1) taking on Michael Johnson (16-16).

Dariush is rated at 1557 — 402 points above Johnson's 1155. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Johnson has won 3 straight.

Stylistically this is Dariush's wrestler game against Johnson's striker approach. Dariush looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Johnson brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Johnson throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Dariush is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Johnson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Michael Johnson over Beneil Dariush. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Johnson at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Dariush at 40% implied while our model sees 48% — a 7-point disagreement that could signal value.

Derek Brunson vs Sam Alvey

Middleweight
85%
Derek Brunson
Brunson
14-7
CO-I1563
Wrestler
VS
Alvey
10-13-1
PR-II862
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 59%
Under 59%Over 41%

The Middleweight matchup features Derek Brunson (14-7) taking on Sam Alvey (10-13-1).

Brunson is rated at 1563 — 701 points above Alvey's 862. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Brunson looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Alvey is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Brunson the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Alvey throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Brunson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.7 more per 15 minutes. Alvey has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Derek Brunson over Sam Alvey. The model is firm on this one: Brunson at 85%. Notably, the betting market has Brunson at 78% implied while our model sees 85% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.

76%
Jared Rosholt
Rosholt
6-2
CO-III1256
Wrestler
VS
Johnson
4-3
RK-II1071
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 56%
Under 56%Over 44%

The Heavyweight matchup features Jared Rosholt (6-2) taking on Timothy Johnson (4-3).

Rosholt is rated at 1256 — 185 points above Johnson's 1071. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Rosholt rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Johnson throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Johnson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Johnson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jared Rosholt over Timothy Johnson. The model is firm on this one: Rosholt at 76%. Notably, the betting market has Rosholt at 70% implied while our model sees 76% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.

Amanda Nunes vs Sara McMann

Women's Bantamweight
54%
Amanda Nunes
Nunes
16-2
CH-II1707
Wrestler
VS
McMann
7-6
RK-I1189
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Amanda Nunes (16-2) taking on Sara McMann (7-6). Nunes is the bigger frame at 5'8" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Nunes is rated at 1707 — 518 points above McMann's 1189. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nunes throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. McMann is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. McMann has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Amanda Nunes over Sara McMann. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Nunes at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Nunes at 30% implied while our model sees 54% — a 24-point disagreement that could signal value.

83%
Ray Borg
Borg
7-5
CO-III1255
Wrestler
VS
Herrera
1-3
MC-I992
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Flyweight matchup features Ray Borg (7-5) taking on Geane Herrera (1-3). Herrera will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Borg is rated at 1255 — 263 points above Herrera's 992. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Borg throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Borg is far more active with takedowns, averaging 5.5 more per 15 minutes. Herrera has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ray Borg over Geane Herrera. The model is firm on this one: Borg at 83%. Notably, the betting market has Borg at 80% implied while our model sees 83% — a 3-point disagreement that could signal value.

75%
Uriah Hall
Hall
10-9
CO-I1504
Striker
VS
Bamgbose
1-4
UC-I766
Over/UnderUnder 64%
Under 64%Over 36%

The Middleweight matchup features Uriah Hall (10-9) taking on Oluwale Bamgbose (1-4).

Hall is rated at 1504 — 738 points above Bamgbose's 766. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hall throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Hall is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Bamgbose has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Uriah Hall over Oluwale Bamgbose. The model is firm on this one: Hall at 75%. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Chris Camozzi vs Tom Watson

Middleweight
68%
Chris Camozzi
Camozzi
9-10
RK-III1038
All-Rounder
VS
Watson
2-5
PR-I880
Striker
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Middleweight matchup features Chris Camozzi (9-10) taking on Tom Watson (2-5).

Camozzi is rated at 1038 — 157 points above Watson's 880. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Camozzi's all-rounder game against Watson's striker approach. Camozzi is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Watson brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Watson throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Watson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Camozzi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chris Camozzi over Tom Watson. We're leaning Camozzi here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Camozzi at 57% implied while our model sees 68% — a 10-point disagreement that could signal value.

82%
Dustin Ortiz
Ortiz
8-6
CO-II1384
Striker
VS
Gates
1-3
UC-II730
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Flyweight matchup features Dustin Ortiz (8-6) taking on Willie Gates (1-3). Gates is the bigger frame at 5'8" with a 7-inch reach advantage.

Ortiz is rated at 1384 — 654 points above Gates's 730. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Ortiz rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ortiz throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Ortiz is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.5 more per 15 minutes. Ortiz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dustin Ortiz over Willie Gates. The model is firm on this one: Ortiz at 82%. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

63%
Frankie Saenz
Saenz
5-5
MC-III925
Striker
VS
Kakai
1-1
RK-III1010
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Bantamweight matchup features Frankie Saenz (5-5) taking on Sirwan Kakai (1-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Kakai at 1010 versus Saenz at 925. That 85-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Saenz throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Kakai is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Kakai has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Frankie Saenz over Sirwan Kakai. The model gives Saenz a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Saenz at 49% implied while our model sees 63% — a 14-point disagreement that could signal value.

Jonathan Wilson vs Chris Dempsey

Light Heavyweight
54%
Chris Dempsey
Wilson
1-3
UC-II733
VS
Dempsey
1-3
UC-II686
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Jonathan Wilson (1-3) taking on Chris Dempsey (1-3). Wilson is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Wilson carries a modest Elo edge (733 to 686), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dempsey throws significantly more leather — a 2.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Dempsey is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Wilson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chris Dempsey over Jonathan Wilson. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Dempsey at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 59% for Wilson, but our model sees only 46%. That 12-point gap favoring Dempsey is worth watching.

Marlon Vera vs Roman Salazar

Bantamweight
58%
Marlon Vera
Vera
15-11
CO-I1489
All-Rounder
VS
Salazar
0-2
UC-I751
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Bantamweight matchup features Marlon Vera (15-11) taking on Roman Salazar (0-2).

Vera is rated at 1489 — 738 points above Salazar's 751. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Salazar throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Salazar is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Salazar has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Marlon Vera over Roman Salazar. The model gives Vera a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Vera at 54% implied while our model sees 58% — a 4-point disagreement that could signal value.

88%
Scott Holtzman
Holtzman
7-6
RK-II1099
All-Rounder
VS
Christodoulou
0-2
UC-I780
Over/UnderUnder 55%
Under 55%Over 45%

The Lightweight matchup features Scott Holtzman (7-6) taking on Anthony Christodoulou (0-2).

Holtzman is rated at 1099 — 320 points above Christodoulou's 780. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Christodoulou throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Christodoulou is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Holtzman has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Scott Holtzman over Anthony Christodoulou. The model is firm on this one: Holtzman at 88%. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.