UFC Fight Night: Gonzaga vs Cro Cop 2: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, April 11, 2015·Krakow, Poland
Published April 16, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Gonzaga vs Cro Cop 2 lands on Saturday, April 11, 2015 in Krakow, Poland with 12 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Mirko Filipovic vs Gabriel GonzagaHeavyweightGabriel GonzagaConfident73%
Jimi Manuwa vs Jan BlachowiczLight HeavyweightJimi ManuwaToss-up54%
Pawel Pawlak vs Sheldon WestcottWelterweightPawel PawlakConfident65%
Maryna Moroz vs Joanne WoodWomen's StrawweightJoanne WoodStrong76%
Leon Edwards vs Seth BaczynskiWelterweightLeon EdwardsLean62%
Bartosz Fabinski vs Garreth McLellanMiddleweightBartosz FabinskiLean60%
Sergio Moraes vs Mickael LeboutWelterweightSergio MoraesStrong79%
Yaotzin Meza vs Damian StasiakFeatherweightDamian StasiakLean59%
Anthony Hamilton vs Daniel OmielanczukHeavyweightAnthony HamiltonLean61%
Aleksandra Albu vs Izabela BadurekWomen's StrawweightAleksandra AlbuConfident68%
Stevie Ray vs Marcin BandelLightweightStevie RayLean62%
Taylor Lapilus vs Rocky LeeFeatherweightTaylor LapilusConfident70%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

73%
Gabriel Gonzaga
Filipovic
5-6
CO-III1235
All-Rounder
VS
Gonzaga
12-10
RK-II1072
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 60%
Under 60%Over 40%

The Heavyweight matchup features Mirko Filipovic (5-6) taking on Gabriel Gonzaga (12-10). Gonzaga will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Filipovic is rated at 1235 — 163 points above Gonzaga's 1072. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Filipovic's all-rounder game against Gonzaga's knockout artist approach. Filipovic is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Gonzaga is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Gonzaga throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Gonzaga is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Gonzaga has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Gabriel Gonzaga over Mirko Filipovic. We're leaning Gonzaga here at 73%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market implies 34% for Filipovic, but our model sees only 27%. That 7-point gap favoring Gonzaga is worth watching.

Jimi Manuwa vs Jan Blachowicz

Light Heavyweight
54%
Jimi Manuwa
Manuwa
6-6
RK-I1195
Knockout Artist
VS
Blachowicz
12-8-2
CH-II1703
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Jimi Manuwa (6-6) taking on Jan Blachowicz (12-8-2).

Blachowicz is rated at 1703 — 508 points above Manuwa's 1195. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Manuwa's knockout artist game against Blachowicz's all-rounder approach. Manuwa is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Blachowicz is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Blachowicz throws significantly more leather — a 2.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Manuwa is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Blachowicz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jimi Manuwa over Jan Blachowicz. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Manuwa at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

65%
Pawel Pawlak
Pawlak
1-2
PR-I872
VS
Westcott
1-2
PR-I870
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Welterweight matchup features Pawel Pawlak (1-2) taking on Sheldon Westcott (1-2).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Pawlak at 872, Westcott at 870. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pawlak throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Westcott is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.1 more per 15 minutes. Pawlak has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Pawel Pawlak over Sheldon Westcott. We're leaning Pawlak here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Pawlak at 35% implied while our model sees 65% — a 30-point disagreement that could signal value.

Maryna Moroz vs Joanne Wood

Women's Strawweight
76%
Joanne Wood
Moroz
6-6
RK-III1018
All-Rounder
VS
Wood
9-8
RK-I1133
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 63%
Under 37%Over 63%

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Maryna Moroz (6-6) taking on Joanne Wood (9-8).

There's a real Elo separation here: Wood at 1133 versus Moroz at 1018. That 115-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Wood throws significantly more leather — a 7.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Wood is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Moroz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Joanne Wood over Maryna Moroz. The model is firm on this one: Wood at 76%. Notably, the betting market has Moroz at 14% implied while our model sees 24% — a 10-point disagreement that could signal value.

62%
Leon Edwards
Edwards
14-5
CH-II1747
All-Rounder
VS
Baczynski
5-6
PR-III822
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Welterweight matchup features Leon Edwards (14-5) taking on Seth Baczynski (5-6).

Edwards is rated at 1747 — 925 points above Baczynski's 822. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Baczynski throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Baczynski is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Edwards has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Leon Edwards over Seth Baczynski. The model gives Edwards a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Edwards at 54% implied while our model sees 62% — a 8-point disagreement that could signal value.

60%
Bartosz Fabinski
Fabinski
3-3
MC-I970
Striker
VS
McLellan
1-4
UC-I795
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Middleweight matchup features Bartosz Fabinski (3-3) taking on Garreth McLellan (1-4). Fabinski will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Fabinski is rated at 970 — 174 points above McLellan's 795. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. McLellan throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. McLellan is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. McLellan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Bartosz Fabinski over Garreth McLellan. The model gives Fabinski a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Fabinski at 54% implied while our model sees 60% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.

79%
Sergio Moraes
Moraes
8-5-1
CO-III1267
All-Rounder
VS
Lebout
1-2
RK-III1009
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Welterweight matchup features Sergio Moraes (8-5-1) taking on Mickael Lebout (1-2).

Moraes is rated at 1267 — 259 points above Lebout's 1009. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Moraes throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Moraes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.4 more per 15 minutes. Lebout has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Sergio Moraes over Mickael Lebout. The model is firm on this one: Moraes at 79%. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

59%
Damian Stasiak
Meza
2-4
MC-III902
Wrestler
VS
Stasiak
2-4
PR-I891
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 63%
Under 37%Over 63%

The Featherweight matchup features Yaotzin Meza (2-4) taking on Damian Stasiak (2-4). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Meza.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Meza at 902, Stasiak at 891. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Meza throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Meza is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Stasiak has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Damian Stasiak over Yaotzin Meza. The model gives Stasiak a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 46% for Meza, but our model sees only 41%. That 4-point gap favoring Stasiak is worth watching.

61%
Anthony Hamilton
Hamilton
3-7
UC-II715
Striker
VS
Omielanczuk
4-5
RK-III1005
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 54%
Under 54%Over 46%

The Heavyweight matchup features Anthony Hamilton (3-7) taking on Daniel Omielanczuk (4-5). Hamilton is the bigger frame at 6'5" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Omielanczuk is rated at 1005 — 290 points above Hamilton's 715. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hamilton throws significantly more leather — a 3.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Hamilton is far more active with takedowns, averaging 5.1 more per 15 minutes. Hamilton has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Anthony Hamilton over Daniel Omielanczuk. The model gives Hamilton a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Hamilton at 42% implied while our model sees 61% — a 19-point disagreement that could signal value.

Aleksandra Albu vs Izabela Badurek

Women's Strawweight
68%
Aleksandra Albu
Albu
2-2
PR-II857
VS
Badurek
0-1
PR-II834
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Aleksandra Albu (2-2) taking on Izabela Badurek (0-1).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Albu at 857, Badurek at 834. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Badurek throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Badurek is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Badurek has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Aleksandra Albu over Izabela Badurek. We're leaning Albu here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

62%
Stevie Ray
Ray
7-4
CO-III1257
All-Rounder
VS
Bandel
0-2
UC-II702
Over/UnderUnder 50%
Under 50%Over 50%

The Lightweight matchup features Stevie Ray (7-4) taking on Marcin Bandel (0-2).

Ray is rated at 1257 — 555 points above Bandel's 702. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Bandel throws significantly more leather — a 3.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Bandel is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Ray has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Stevie Ray over Marcin Bandel. The model gives Ray a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Taylor Lapilus vs Rocky Lee

Featherweight
70%
Taylor Lapilus
Lapilus
6-2
CO-III1301
All-Rounder
VS
Lee
0-1
PR-I873
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Featherweight matchup features Taylor Lapilus (6-2) taking on Rocky Lee (0-1).

Lapilus is rated at 1301 — 428 points above Lee's 873. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lee throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Lee is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Lee has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Taylor Lapilus over Rocky Lee. We're leaning Lapilus here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Lapilus at 65% implied while our model sees 70% — a 5-point disagreement that could signal value.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.