UFC 179: Aldo vs Mendes 2: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, October 25, 2014·Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

UFC 179: Aldo vs Mendes 2 lands on Saturday, October 25, 2014 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil with 11 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Jose Aldo vs Chad MendesFeatherweightJose AldoLean63%
Phil Davis vs Glover TeixeiraLight HeavyweightPhil DavisLean60%
Fabio Maldonado vs Hans StringerLight HeavyweightFabio MaldonadoLean57%
Darren Elkins vs Lucas MartinsFeatherweightDarren ElkinsToss-up50%
Beneil Dariush vs Diego FerreiraLightweightDiego FerreiraConfident67%
Neil Magny vs William MacarioWelterweightWilliam MacarioToss-up53%
Yan Cabral vs Naoyuki KotaniLightweightYan CabralStrong81%
Wilson Reis vs Scott JorgensenFlyweightWilson ReisLean63%
Andre Fili vs Felipe ArantesFeatherweightFelipe ArantesLean55%
Gilbert Burns vs Christos GiagosLightweightGilbert BurnsLean63%
Anthony Rocco Martin vs Fabricio CamoesLightweightAnthony Rocco MartinLean62%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Jose Aldo vs Chad Mendes

FeatherweightTitle Fight
63%
Jose Aldo
Aldo
14-8
Elo 1420
All-Rounder
VS
Mendes
9-4
Elo 1377
Striker

The Featherweight championship matchup features Jose Aldo (14-8) taking on Chad Mendes (9-4). Aldo will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Aldo carries a modest Elo edge (1420 to 1377), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Aldo is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Mendes is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, knockout artists own a 54% win rate against submission artists, giving Aldo the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mendes throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Mendes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.1 more per 15 minutes. Mendes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Jose Aldo over Chad Mendes.** The model gives Aldo a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

Phil Davis vs Glover Teixeira

Light Heavyweight
60%
Phil Davis
Davis
9-2
Elo 1427
Wrestler
VS
Teixeira
16-6
Elo 1596
Wrestler

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Phil Davis (9-2) taking on Glover Teixeira (16-6). Davis will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Teixeira is rated at 1596 — 169 points above Davis's 1427. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Davis looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Teixeira is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Davis the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Teixeira throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Teixeira is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Davis has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Phil Davis over Glover Teixeira.** The model gives Davis a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Fabio Maldonado vs Hans Stringer

Light Heavyweight
57%
Fabio Maldonado
Maldonado
5-5
Elo 1043
Knockout Artist
VS
Stringer
1-1
Elo 839

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Fabio Maldonado (5-5) taking on Hans Stringer (1-1).

Maldonado is rated at 1043 — 204 points above Stringer's 839. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Maldonado throws significantly more leather — a 3.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Stringer is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Maldonado has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Fabio Maldonado over Hans Stringer.** The model gives Maldonado a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

50%
Darren Elkins
Elkins
19-10
Elo 1113
Wrestler
VS
Martins
3-3
Elo 1095
All-Rounder

The Featherweight matchup features Darren Elkins (19-10) taking on Lucas Martins (3-3).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Elkins at 1113, Martins at 1095. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

The style clash matters here: Elkins looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Martins is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Elkins the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Martins throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Elkins is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.4 more per 15 minutes. Elkins has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Darren Elkins over Lucas Martins.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Elkins at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

67%
Diego Ferreira
Dariush
17-6-1
Elo 1437
All-Rounder
VS
Ferreira
10-6
Elo 1213
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Beneil Dariush (17-6-1) taking on Diego Ferreira (10-6).

Dariush is rated at 1437 — 224 points above Ferreira's 1213. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ferreira throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Dariush is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Ferreira has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Diego Ferreira over Beneil Dariush.** We're leaning Ferreira here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

53%
William Macario
Magny
24-12
Elo 1270
Wrestler
VS
Macario
1-2
Elo 789

The Welterweight matchup features Neil Magny (24-12) taking on William Macario (1-2). Magny is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Magny is rated at 1270 — 482 points above Macario's 789. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Macario throws significantly more leather — a 3.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Macario is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Macario has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: William Macario over Neil Magny.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Macario at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

81%
Yan Cabral
Cabral
2-2
Elo 900
VS
Kotani
0-4
Elo 684

The Lightweight matchup features Yan Cabral (2-2) taking on Naoyuki Kotani (0-4). Cabral is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 7-inch reach advantage.

Cabral is rated at 900 — 216 points above Kotani's 684. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cabral throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Cabral is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Cabral has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Yan Cabral over Naoyuki Kotani.** The model is firm on this one: Cabral at 81%.

63%
Wilson Reis
Reis
7-5
Elo 1083
Wrestler
VS
Jorgensen
4-7
Elo 735
Wrestler

The Flyweight matchup features Wilson Reis (7-5) taking on Scott Jorgensen (4-7).

Reis is rated at 1083 — 347 points above Jorgensen's 735. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jorgensen throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Reis is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Reis has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Wilson Reis over Scott Jorgensen.** The model gives Reis a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

Andre Fili vs Felipe Arantes

Featherweight
55%
Felipe Arantes
Fili
12-11
Elo 1140
Striker
VS
Arantes
5-5-1
Elo 925
Wrestler

The Featherweight matchup features Andre Fili (12-11) taking on Felipe Arantes (5-5-1). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Fili.

Fili is rated at 1140 — 214 points above Arantes's 925. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Fili's striker game against Arantes's all-rounder approach. Fili brings a versatile approach, while Arantes is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fili throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Fili is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Arantes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Felipe Arantes over Andre Fili.** The model gives Arantes a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

63%
Gilbert Burns
Burns
15-8
Elo 1379
All-Rounder
VS
Giagos
6-7
Elo 940
Wrestler

The Lightweight matchup features Gilbert Burns (15-8) taking on Christos Giagos (6-7).

Burns is rated at 1379 — 439 points above Giagos's 940. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Burns is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Giagos looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Giagos the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Burns throws significantly more leather — a 2.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Burns is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Giagos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Gilbert Burns over Christos Giagos.** The model gives Burns a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

62%
Anthony Rocco Martin
Martin
9-5
Elo 1419
All-Rounder
VS
Camoes
1-3-1
Elo 846
Wrestler

The Lightweight matchup features Anthony Rocco Martin (9-5) taking on Fabricio Camoes (1-3-1). Martin is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Martin is rated at 1419 — 574 points above Camoes's 846. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Martin is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Camoes looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Camoes the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Martin throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Camoes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Camoes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Anthony Rocco Martin over Fabricio Camoes.** The model gives Martin a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.