UFC Fight Night: McGregor vs Brandao: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, July 19, 2014·Dublin, Leinster, Ireland
Published April 22, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: McGregor vs Brandao lands on Saturday, July 19, 2014 in Dublin, Leinster, Ireland with 10 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Conor McGregor vs Diego BrandaoFeatherweightConor McGregorStrong76%
Gunnar Nelson vs Zak CummingsWelterweightGunnar NelsonConfident65%
Ian McCall vs Brad PickettFlyweightIan McCallToss-up51%
Norman Parke vs Naoyuki KotaniLightweightNorman ParkeConfident73%
Ilir Latifi vs Chris DempseyLight HeavyweightIlir LatifiToss-up54%
Neil Seery vs Phil HarrisFlyweightPhil HarrisToss-up54%
Cathal Pendred vs Mike KingMiddleweightCathal PendredLean62%
Trevor Smith vs Tor TroengMiddleweightTrevor SmithConfident66%
Nikita Krylov vs Cody DonovanLight HeavyweightNikita KrylovStrong75%
Paddy Holohan vs Josh SampoFlyweightPaddy HolohanToss-up55%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

76%
Conor McGregor
McGregor
10-4
CH-III1685
Striker
VS
Brandao
6-4
CO-III1206
Submission Artist
Over/UnderOver 57%
Under 43%Over 57%

The Featherweight matchup features Conor McGregor (10-4) taking on Diego Brandao (6-4). McGregor is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 10-inch reach advantage.

McGregor is rated at 1685 — 480 points above Brandao's 1206. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is McGregor's striker game against Brandao's wrestler approach. McGregor brings a versatile approach, while Brandao looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. McGregor throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. McGregor is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. McGregor has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Conor McGregor over Diego Brandao. The model is firm on this one: McGregor at 76%.

65%
Gunnar Nelson
Nelson
10-6
CO-II1437
Wrestler
VS
Cummings
10-4
CO-II1433
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Welterweight matchup features Gunnar Nelson (10-6) taking on Zak Cummings (10-4). Cummings will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Nelson at 1437, Cummings at 1433. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

The style clash matters here: Nelson looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Cummings is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Nelson the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nelson throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Cummings is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Nelson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Gunnar Nelson over Zak Cummings. We're leaning Nelson here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

51%
Ian McCall
McCall
2-3-1
RK-III1055
Striker
VS
Pickett
5-9
MC-II938
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 63%
Under 37%Over 63%

The Flyweight matchup features Ian McCall (2-3-1) taking on Brad Pickett (5-9). Pickett will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: McCall at 1055 versus Pickett at 938. That 117-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is McCall's striker game against Pickett's all-rounder approach. McCall brings a versatile approach, while Pickett is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. McCall throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Pickett is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Pickett has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ian McCall over Brad Pickett. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward McCall at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

73%
Norman Parke
Parke
5-3-1
RK-I1182
Striker
VS
Kotani
0-5
UC-III595
Over/UnderUnder 52%
Under 52%Over 48%

The Lightweight matchup features Norman Parke (5-3-1) taking on Naoyuki Kotani (0-5). Parke is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Parke is rated at 1182 — 587 points above Kotani's 595. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Parke throws significantly more leather — a 2.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Parke is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Parke has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Norman Parke over Naoyuki Kotani. We're leaning Parke here at 73%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Ilir Latifi vs Chris Dempsey

Light Heavyweight
54%
Ilir Latifi
Latifi
9-7
CO-III1309
Wrestler
VS
Dempsey
1-3
UC-II686
Over/UnderUnder 54%
Under 54%Over 46%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Ilir Latifi (9-7) taking on Chris Dempsey (1-3).

Latifi is rated at 1309 — 622 points above Dempsey's 686. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Latifi throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Latifi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Dempsey has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ilir Latifi over Chris Dempsey. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Latifi at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

54%
Phil Harris
Seery
3-4
MC-I996
Wrestler
VS
Harris
1-3
UC-I792
Over/UnderOver 64%
Under 36%Over 64%

The Flyweight matchup features Neil Seery (3-4) taking on Phil Harris (1-3).

Seery is rated at 996 — 204 points above Harris's 792. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Seery throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Harris is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Harris has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Phil Harris over Neil Seery. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Harris at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Cathal Pendred vs Mike King

Middleweight
62%
Cathal Pendred
Pendred
4-2
RK-II1108
Wrestler
VS
King
0-1
PR-II834
Over/UnderUnder 62%
Under 62%Over 38%

The Middleweight matchup features Cathal Pendred (4-2) taking on Mike King (0-1).

Pendred is rated at 1108 — 274 points above King's 834. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. King throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. King is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. King has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Cathal Pendred over Mike King. The model gives Pendred a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

Trevor Smith vs Tor Troeng

Middleweight
66%
Trevor Smith
Smith
5-7
RK-III1023
Wrestler
VS
Troeng
1-3
UC-I791
Over/UnderOver 50%
Under 50%Over 50%

The Middleweight matchup features Trevor Smith (5-7) taking on Tor Troeng (1-3).

Smith is rated at 1023 — 232 points above Troeng's 791. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Smith throws significantly more leather — a 4.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Smith is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Smith has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Trevor Smith over Tor Troeng. We're leaning Smith here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Nikita Krylov vs Cody Donovan

Light Heavyweight
75%
Nikita Krylov
Krylov
12-9
CO-I1472
Submission Artist
VS
Donovan
1-3
UC-III637
Over/UnderUnder 63%
Under 63%Over 37%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Nikita Krylov (12-9) taking on Cody Donovan (1-3). Krylov will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Krylov is rated at 1472 — 835 points above Donovan's 637. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Donovan throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Donovan is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Donovan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Nikita Krylov over Cody Donovan. The model is firm on this one: Krylov at 75%.

55%
Paddy Holohan
Holohan
3-2
RK-II1097
VS
Sampo
1-3
UC-I750
Over/UnderOver 60%
Under 40%Over 60%

The Flyweight matchup features Paddy Holohan (3-2) taking on Josh Sampo (1-3). Holohan is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Holohan is rated at 1097 — 347 points above Sampo's 750. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sampo throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Sampo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Holohan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Paddy Holohan over Josh Sampo. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Holohan at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.