UFC on FOX: Henderson vs Thomson: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, January 25, 2014·Chicago, Illinois, USA
Published April 18, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC on FOX: Henderson vs Thomson lands on Saturday, January 25, 2014 in Chicago, Illinois, USA with 11 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Benson Henderson vs Josh ThomsonLightweightBenson HendersonConfident66%
Stipe Miocic vs Gabriel GonzagaHeavyweightStipe MiocicConfident69%
Donald Cerrone vs Adriano MartinsLightweightAdriano MartinsToss-up51%
Jeremy Stephens vs Darren ElkinsFeatherweightDarren ElkinsToss-up55%
Alex Caceres vs Sergio PettisBantamweightSergio PettisLean58%
Eddie Wineland vs Yves JabouinBantamweightEddie WinelandLean61%
Chico Camus vs Yaotzin MezaBantamweightYaotzin MezaToss-up54%
Hugo Viana vs Ramiro HernandezBantamweightHugo VianaConfident69%
Daron Cruickshank vs Mike RioLightweightDaron CruickshankConfident69%
George Sullivan vs Mike RhodesWelterweightMike RhodesConfident66%
Nikita Krylov vs Walt HarrisHeavyweightNikita KrylovStrong80%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Benson Henderson vs Josh Thomson

LightweightTitle Fight
66%
Benson Henderson
Henderson
11-3
CH-III1610
All-Rounder
VS
Thomson
3-4
CO-II1357
Striker
Over/UnderOver 70%
Under 30%Over 70%

The Lightweight championship matchup features Benson Henderson (11-3) taking on Josh Thomson (3-4).

Henderson is rated at 1610 — 253 points above Thomson's 1357. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Henderson's all-rounder game against Thomson's striker approach. Henderson is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Thomson brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Henderson throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Thomson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Henderson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Benson Henderson over Josh Thomson. We're leaning Henderson here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

69%
Stipe Miocic
Miocic
14-5
CH-I1974
Striker
VS
Gonzaga
12-10
RK-II1072
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 57%
Under 57%Over 43%

The Heavyweight matchup features Stipe Miocic (14-5) taking on Gabriel Gonzaga (12-10). Miocic is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Miocic is rated at 1974 — 902 points above Gonzaga's 1072. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Miocic brings a versatile approach, while Gonzaga is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Gonzaga the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Miocic throws significantly more leather — a 3.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Gonzaga is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.5 more per 15 minutes. Miocic has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Stipe Miocic over Gabriel Gonzaga. We're leaning Miocic here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

51%
Adriano Martins
Cerrone
23-14
CO-III1238
All-Rounder
VS
Martins
4-3
RK-I1163
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 50%
Under 50%Over 50%

The Lightweight matchup features Donald Cerrone (23-14) taking on Adriano Martins (4-3). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Cerrone.

Cerrone carries a modest Elo edge (1238 to 1163), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cerrone throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Cerrone is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Martins has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Adriano Martins over Donald Cerrone. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Martins at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

55%
Darren Elkins
Stephens
15-19
RK-II1112
Striker
VS
Elkins
19-11
RK-I1191
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Featherweight matchup features Jeremy Stephens (15-19) taking on Darren Elkins (19-11).

Elkins carries a modest Elo edge (1191 to 1112), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Elkins throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Stephens is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Stephens has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Darren Elkins over Jeremy Stephens. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Elkins at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

58%
Sergio Pettis
Caceres
16-13
CO-III1264
All-Rounder
VS
Pettis
9-5
CO-III1314
Striker
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Bantamweight matchup features Alex Caceres (16-13) taking on Sergio Pettis (9-5). Caceres is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Pettis carries a modest Elo edge (1314 to 1264), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Caceres's submission artist game against Pettis's striker approach. Caceres is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Pettis brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pettis throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Pettis is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.8 more per 15 minutes. Caceres has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Sergio Pettis over Alex Caceres. The model gives Pettis a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

61%
Eddie Wineland
Wineland
6-10
RK-III1019
Striker
VS
Jabouin
5-5
MC-III906
Striker
Over/UnderOver 57%
Under 43%Over 57%

The Bantamweight matchup features Eddie Wineland (6-10) taking on Yves Jabouin (5-5).

There's a real Elo separation here: Wineland at 1019 versus Jabouin at 906. That 113-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Wineland throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Jabouin is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Jabouin has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Eddie Wineland over Yves Jabouin. The model gives Wineland a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

Chico Camus vs Yaotzin Meza

Bantamweight
54%
Yaotzin Meza
Camus
3-4
MC-I977
All-Rounder
VS
Meza
2-4
MC-III902
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Bantamweight matchup features Chico Camus (3-4) taking on Yaotzin Meza (2-4). Meza is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Camus carries a modest Elo edge (977 to 902), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Camus is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Meza looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Meza the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Camus throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Meza is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Camus has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Yaotzin Meza over Chico Camus. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Meza at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

69%
Hugo Viana
Viana
3-3
PR-I880
Striker
VS
Hernandez
0-2
PR-III803
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Bantamweight matchup features Hugo Viana (3-3) taking on Ramiro Hernandez (0-2).

Viana carries a modest Elo edge (880 to 803), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Viana throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Hernandez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Viana has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Hugo Viana over Ramiro Hernandez. We're leaning Viana here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

69%
Daron Cruickshank
Cruickshank
6-6
MC-II957
Wrestler
VS
Rio
1-3
UC-I762
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Lightweight matchup features Daron Cruickshank (6-6) taking on Mike Rio (1-3).

Cruickshank is rated at 957 — 195 points above Rio's 762. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cruickshank throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Rio is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.9 more per 15 minutes. Cruickshank has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Daron Cruickshank over Mike Rio. We're leaning Cruickshank here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

66%
Mike Rhodes
Sullivan
3-4
MC-II939
Wrestler
VS
Rhodes
0-3
UC-I781
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Welterweight matchup features George Sullivan (3-4) taking on Mike Rhodes (0-3).

Sullivan is rated at 939 — 158 points above Rhodes's 781. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rhodes throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Rhodes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Rhodes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mike Rhodes over George Sullivan. We're leaning Rhodes here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

80%
Nikita Krylov
Krylov
12-9
CO-I1472
Submission Artist
VS
Harris
6-9
CO-III1273
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 61%
Under 61%Over 39%

The Heavyweight matchup features Nikita Krylov (12-9) taking on Walt Harris (6-9).

Krylov is rated at 1472 — 199 points above Harris's 1273. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Krylov's submission artist game against Harris's striker approach. Krylov is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Harris brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Krylov throws significantly more leather — a 2.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Harris is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Harris has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Nikita Krylov over Walt Harris. The model is firm on this one: Krylov at 80%.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.