UFC 309: Jones vs. Miocic: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, November 16, 2024·New York City, New York, USA

UFC 309: Jones vs. Miocic lands on Saturday, November 16, 2024 in New York City, New York, USA with 12 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Jon Jones vs Stipe MiocicHeavyweightJon JonesConfident71%
Charles Oliveira vs Michael ChandlerLightweightCharles OliveiraLean57%
Bo Nickal vs Paul CraigMiddleweightBo NickalConfident68%
Viviane Araujo vs Karine SilvaWomen's FlyweightKarine SilvaLean60%
Mauricio Ruffy vs James LlontopCatch WeightMauricio RuffyLean58%
Marcus McGhee vs Jonathan MartinezBantamweightJonathan MartinezConfident69%
Jim Miller vs Damon JacksonLightweightJim MillerToss-up53%
David Onama vs Roberto RomeroLightweightDavid OnamaLean56%
Marcin Tybura vs Jhonata DinizHeavyweightMarcin TyburaLean58%
Ramiz Brahimaj vs Mickey GallWelterweightRamiz BrahimajConfident66%
Oban Elliott vs Bassil HafezWelterweightOban ElliottConfident71%
Eduarda Moura vs Veronica HardyWomen's FlyweightVeronica HardyToss-up51%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Jon Jones vs Stipe Miocic

Heavyweight
71%
Jon Jones
Jones
21-1
Elo 2161
All-Rounder
VS
Miocic
14-4
Elo 1847
Striker

The Heavyweight matchup features Jon Jones (21-1) taking on Stipe Miocic (14-4). Jones will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Jones is rated at 2161 — 315 points above Miocic's 1847. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Jones rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Jones's all-rounder game against Miocic's striker approach. Jones is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Miocic brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Miocic throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Miocic is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Jones has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Jon Jones over Stipe Miocic.** We're leaning Jones here at 71%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Charles Oliveira vs Michael Chandler

LightweightTitle Fight
57%
Charles Oliveira
Oliveira
23-11
Elo 1846
Wrestler
VS
Chandler
2-4
Elo 1319
All-Rounder

The Lightweight championship matchup features Charles Oliveira (23-11) taking on Michael Chandler (2-4). Oliveira is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Oliveira is rated at 1846 — 527 points above Chandler's 1319. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Oliveira is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Chandler is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, submission artists own a 56% win rate against all-rounders, giving Oliveira the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Chandler throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Chandler is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Chandler has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Charles Oliveira over Michael Chandler.** The model gives Oliveira a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

Bo Nickal vs Paul Craig

Middleweight
68%
Bo Nickal
Nickal
4-1
Elo 1320
Wrestler
VS
Craig
9-9-1
Elo 1045
Wrestler

The Middleweight matchup features Bo Nickal (4-1) taking on Paul Craig (9-9-1).

Nickal is rated at 1320 — 275 points above Craig's 1045. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Craig throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Nickal is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.3 more per 15 minutes. Nickal has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Bo Nickal over Paul Craig.** We're leaning Nickal here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Viviane Araujo vs Karine Silva

Women's Flyweight
60%
Karine Silva
Araujo
7-5
Elo 1207
All-Rounder
VS
Silva
5-1
Elo 1237
Wrestler

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Viviane Araujo (7-5) taking on Karine Silva (5-1).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Araujo at 1207, Silva at 1237. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

The style clash matters here: Araujo is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Silva looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Silva the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Araujo throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Silva is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.1 more per 15 minutes. Araujo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Karine Silva over Viviane Araujo.** The model gives Silva a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

58%
Mauricio Ruffy
Ruffy
3-1
Elo 1462
VS
Llontop
0-2
Elo 818

The Catch Weight matchup features Mauricio Ruffy (3-1) taking on James Llontop (0-2).

Ruffy is rated at 1462 — 644 points above Llontop's 818. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Llontop throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Llontop is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Ruffy has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Mauricio Ruffy over James Llontop.** The model gives Ruffy a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

69%
Jonathan Martinez
McGhee
4-0
Elo 1329
VS
Martinez
10-4
Elo 1343
All-Rounder

The Bantamweight matchup features Marcus McGhee (4-0) taking on Jonathan Martinez (10-4).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — McGhee at 1329, Martinez at 1343. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets. McGhee rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. McGhee throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. McGhee is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. McGhee has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Jonathan Martinez over Marcus McGhee.** We're leaning Martinez here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

53%
Jim Miller
Miller
27-17
Elo 1213
Knockout Artist
VS
Jackson
6-5-1
Elo 1039
Wrestler

The Lightweight matchup features Jim Miller (27-17) taking on Damon Jackson (6-5-1). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Jackson.

Miller is rated at 1213 — 174 points above Jackson's 1039. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Miller's knockout artist game against Jackson's wrestler approach. Miller is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Jackson looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Miller throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Jackson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Miller has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Jim Miller over Damon Jackson.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Miller at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

56%
David Onama
Onama
6-2
Elo 1311
All-Rounder
VS
Romero
0-1
Elo 795

The Lightweight matchup features David Onama (6-2) taking on Roberto Romero (0-1). Onama is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Onama is rated at 1311 — 515 points above Romero's 795. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Onama rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Onama throws significantly more leather — a 4.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Onama is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Romero has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: David Onama over Roberto Romero.** The model gives Onama a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

58%
Marcin Tybura
Tybura
14-8
Elo 1242
Wrestler
VS
Diniz
3-1
Elo 1031

The Heavyweight matchup features Marcin Tybura (14-8) taking on Jhonata Diniz (3-1).

Tybura is rated at 1242 — 211 points above Diniz's 1031. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Diniz throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Tybura is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Diniz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Marcin Tybura over Jhonata Diniz.** The model gives Tybura a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

66%
Ramiz Brahimaj
Brahimaj
5-3
Elo 1144
Submission Artist
VS
Gall
6-6
Elo 760
Wrestler

The Welterweight matchup features Ramiz Brahimaj (5-3) taking on Mickey Gall (6-6). Gall is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Brahimaj is rated at 1144 — 384 points above Gall's 760. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Brahimaj rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Gall throws significantly more leather — a 2.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Brahimaj is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Gall has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Ramiz Brahimaj over Mickey Gall.** We're leaning Brahimaj here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Oban Elliott vs Bassil Hafez

Welterweight
71%
Oban Elliott
Elliott
3-1
Elo 997
VS
Hafez
1-1
Elo 965

The Welterweight matchup features Oban Elliott (3-1) taking on Bassil Hafez (1-1).

Elliott carries a modest Elo edge (997 to 965), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hafez throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Hafez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Elliott has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Oban Elliott over Bassil Hafez.** We're leaning Elliott here at 71%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Eduarda Moura vs Veronica Hardy

Women's Flyweight
51%
Veronica Hardy
Moura
3-1
Elo 1142
VS
Hardy
4-5
Elo 1091
All-Rounder

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Eduarda Moura (3-1) taking on Veronica Hardy (4-5). Moura is the bigger frame at 5'6" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Moura carries a modest Elo edge (1142 to 1091), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hardy throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Moura is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.2 more per 15 minutes. Hardy has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Veronica Hardy over Eduarda Moura.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Hardy at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.