UFC on FUEL TV: Struve vs Miocic: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, September 29, 2012·Nottingham, England, United Kingdom
Published April 25, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC on FUEL TV: Struve vs Miocic lands on Saturday, September 29, 2012 in Nottingham, England, United Kingdom with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Stefan Struve vs Stipe MiocicHeavyweightStefan StruveToss-up55%
Dan Hardy vs Amir SadollahWelterweightDan HardyToss-up51%
Brad Pickett vs Yves JabouinBantamweightYves JabouinConfident67%
Matt Wiman vs Paul SassLightweightMatt WimanLean63%
John Hathaway vs John MaguireWelterweightJohn HathawayConfident70%
Che Mills vs Duane LudwigWelterweightChe MillsConfident67%
Jimi Manuwa vs Kyle KingsburyLight HeavyweightKyle KingsburyLean63%
Akira Corassani vs Andy OgleFeatherweightAndy OgleLean62%
Brad Tavares vs Tom WatsonMiddleweightBrad TavaresConfident66%
Gunnar Nelson vs DaMarques JohnsonCatch WeightDaMarques JohnsonLean60%
Robert Peralta vs Jason YoungFeatherweightRobert PeraltaLean64%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

55%
Stefan Struve
Struve
13-11
RK-II1071
All-Rounder
VS
Miocic
14-5
CH-I1974
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Heavyweight matchup features Stefan Struve (13-11) taking on Stipe Miocic (14-5). Struve is the bigger frame at 6'11" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Miocic is rated at 1974 — 903 points above Struve's 1071. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Struve's submission artist game against Miocic's striker approach. Struve is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Miocic brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Miocic throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Miocic is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.2 more per 15 minutes. Miocic has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Stefan Struve over Stipe Miocic. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Struve at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Dan Hardy vs Amir Sadollah

Welterweight
51%
Dan Hardy
Hardy
6-4
CO-III1313
Wrestler
VS
Sadollah
6-5
MC-I972
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Welterweight matchup features Dan Hardy (6-4) taking on Amir Sadollah (6-5).

Hardy is rated at 1313 — 342 points above Sadollah's 972. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Hardy looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Sadollah is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Hardy the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sadollah throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Sadollah is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Sadollah has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dan Hardy over Amir Sadollah. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Hardy at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Brad Pickett vs Yves Jabouin

Bantamweight
67%
Yves Jabouin
Pickett
5-9
MC-II938
All-Rounder
VS
Jabouin
5-5
MC-III906
Striker
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Bantamweight matchup features Brad Pickett (5-9) taking on Yves Jabouin (5-5).

Pickett carries a modest Elo edge (938 to 906), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Pickett's all-rounder game against Jabouin's striker approach. Pickett is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Jabouin brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pickett throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Pickett is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.3 more per 15 minutes. Jabouin has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Yves Jabouin over Brad Pickett. We're leaning Jabouin here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Matt Wiman vs Paul Sass

Lightweight
63%
Matt Wiman
Wiman
10-8
MC-I995
All-Rounder
VS
Sass
3-2
RK-I1141
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Lightweight matchup features Matt Wiman (10-8) taking on Paul Sass (3-2). Sass is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Sass at 1141 versus Wiman at 995. That 146-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Wiman throws significantly more leather — a 3.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Wiman is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.4 more per 15 minutes. Sass has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Matt Wiman over Paul Sass. The model gives Wiman a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

70%
John Hathaway
Hathaway
7-2
CO-II1351
All-Rounder
VS
Maguire
2-3
PR-I872
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Welterweight matchup features John Hathaway (7-2) taking on John Maguire (2-3). Hathaway is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Hathaway is rated at 1351 — 479 points above Maguire's 872. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Hathaway rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hathaway throws significantly more leather — a 2.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Maguire is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.5 more per 15 minutes. Hathaway has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: John Hathaway over John Maguire. We're leaning Hathaway here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Che Mills vs Duane Ludwig

Welterweight
67%
Che Mills
Mills
2-1
CO-III1251
VS
Ludwig
4-5
PR-I894
Striker
Over/UnderOver 50%
Under 50%Over 50%

The Welterweight matchup features Che Mills (2-1) taking on Duane Ludwig (4-5). Mills is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Mills is rated at 1251 — 357 points above Ludwig's 894. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ludwig throws significantly more leather — a 4.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Ludwig is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Ludwig has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Che Mills over Duane Ludwig. We're leaning Mills here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Jimi Manuwa vs Kyle Kingsbury

Light Heavyweight
63%
Kyle Kingsbury
Manuwa
6-6
RK-I1195
Knockout Artist
VS
Kingsbury
4-5
PR-I869
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 53%
Under 53%Over 47%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Jimi Manuwa (6-6) taking on Kyle Kingsbury (4-5). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Kingsbury.

Manuwa is rated at 1195 — 326 points above Kingsbury's 869. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Manuwa is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Kingsbury brings a versatile approach. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Manuwa the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Kingsbury throws significantly more leather — a 4.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Kingsbury is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.5 more per 15 minutes. Manuwa has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kyle Kingsbury over Jimi Manuwa. The model gives Kingsbury a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

Akira Corassani vs Andy Ogle

Featherweight
62%
Andy Ogle
Corassani
3-3
PR-I875
Striker
VS
Ogle
1-5
UC-II704
Striker
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Featherweight matchup features Akira Corassani (3-3) taking on Andy Ogle (1-5).

Corassani is rated at 875 — 171 points above Ogle's 704. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ogle throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Ogle is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Ogle has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Andy Ogle over Akira Corassani. The model gives Ogle a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

Brad Tavares vs Tom Watson

Middleweight
66%
Brad Tavares
Tavares
16-12
RK-III1023
Striker
VS
Watson
2-5
PR-I880
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 57%
Under 57%Over 43%

The Middleweight matchup features Brad Tavares (16-12) taking on Tom Watson (2-5).

There's a real Elo separation here: Tavares at 1023 versus Watson at 880. That 142-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Tavares throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Tavares is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.8 more per 15 minutes. Watson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brad Tavares over Tom Watson. We're leaning Tavares here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

60%
DaMarques Johnson
Nelson
10-6
CO-II1437
Wrestler
VS
Johnson
4-6
PR-II858
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 52%
Under 52%Over 48%

The Catch Weight matchup features Gunnar Nelson (10-6) taking on DaMarques Johnson (4-6). Johnson is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Nelson is rated at 1437 — 579 points above Johnson's 858. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Nelson looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Johnson is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Nelson the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Johnson throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Johnson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.5 more per 15 minutes. Nelson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: DaMarques Johnson over Gunnar Nelson. The model gives Johnson a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Robert Peralta vs Jason Young

Featherweight
64%
Robert Peralta
Peralta
4-3
RK-II1087
Striker
VS
Young
1-3
UC-I796
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Featherweight matchup features Robert Peralta (4-3) taking on Jason Young (1-3).

Peralta is rated at 1087 — 291 points above Young's 796. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Peralta throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Young is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Peralta has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Robert Peralta over Jason Young. The model gives Peralta a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.