UFC 148: Silva vs Sonnen 2: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, July 7, 2012·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published April 18, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 148: Silva vs Sonnen 2 lands on Saturday, July 7, 2012 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Anderson Silva vs Chael SonnenMiddleweightAnderson SilvaToss-up50%
Forrest Griffin vs Tito OrtizLight HeavyweightForrest GriffinConfident73%
Cung Le vs Patrick CoteMiddleweightCung LeToss-up50%
Demian Maia vs Dong Hyun KimWelterweightDong Hyun KimLean57%
Chad Mendes vs Cody McKenzieFeatherweightChad MendesLean64%
Mike Easton vs Ivan MenjivarBantamweightMike EastonLean59%
Melvin Guillard vs Fabricio CamoesLightweightMelvin GuillardConfident66%
Khabib Nurmagomedov vs Gleison TibauLightweightKhabib NurmagomedovToss-up52%
Constantinos Philippou vs Riki FukudaMiddleweightConstantinos PhilippouLean59%
Shane Roller vs John AlessioLightweightJohn AlessioToss-up54%
Rafaello Oliveira vs Yoislandy IzquierdoLightweightRafaello OliveiraLean59%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

50%
Anderson Silva
Silva
17-7
CO-II1361
All-Rounder
VS
Sonnen
7-7
CO-I1528
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 60%
Under 60%Over 40%

The Middleweight matchup features Anderson Silva (17-7) taking on Chael Sonnen (7-7). Silva will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Sonnen is rated at 1528 — 166 points above Silva's 1361. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Silva's knockout artist game against Sonnen's wrestler approach. Silva is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Sonnen looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sonnen throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Sonnen is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.9 more per 15 minutes. Sonnen has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Anderson Silva over Chael Sonnen. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Silva at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Forrest Griffin vs Tito Ortiz

Light Heavyweight
73%
Forrest Griffin
Griffin
10-5
CO-II1448
All-Rounder
VS
Ortiz
15-11-1
CO-III1233
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 60%
Under 60%Over 40%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Forrest Griffin (10-5) taking on Tito Ortiz (15-11-1). Griffin will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Griffin is rated at 1448 — 215 points above Ortiz's 1233. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Griffin throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Griffin is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Ortiz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Forrest Griffin over Tito Ortiz. We're leaning Griffin here at 73%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Cung Le vs Patrick Cote

Middleweight
50%
Cung Le
Le
2-2
RK-I1200
VS
Cote
10-11
CO-III1256
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 62%
Under 62%Over 38%

The Middleweight matchup features Cung Le (2-2) taking on Patrick Cote (10-11). Cote is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Cote carries a modest Elo edge (1256 to 1200), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Le throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Cote is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Le has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Cung Le over Patrick Cote. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Le at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Demian Maia vs Dong Hyun Kim

Welterweight
57%
Dong Hyun Kim
Maia
22-11
CO-I1506
Wrestler
VS
Kim
13-4
CO-I1471
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 60%
Under 40%Over 60%

The Welterweight matchup features Demian Maia (22-11) taking on Dong Hyun Kim (13-4). Kim will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Maia carries a modest Elo edge (1506 to 1471), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm. Kim has won 3 straight.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Maia throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Kim is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Kim has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dong Hyun Kim over Demian Maia. The model gives Kim a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

Chad Mendes vs Cody McKenzie

Featherweight
64%
Chad Mendes
Mendes
9-5
CO-I1519
Striker
VS
McKenzie
3-4
MC-III923
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Featherweight matchup features Chad Mendes (9-5) taking on Cody McKenzie (3-4). McKenzie is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Mendes is rated at 1519 — 596 points above McKenzie's 923. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Mendes's striker game against McKenzie's wrestler approach. Mendes brings a versatile approach, while McKenzie looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mendes throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Mendes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Mendes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chad Mendes over Cody McKenzie. The model gives Mendes a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

Mike Easton vs Ivan Menjivar

Bantamweight
59%
Mike Easton
Easton
3-4
RK-III1018
Striker
VS
Menjivar
4-5
MC-II958
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Bantamweight matchup features Mike Easton (3-4) taking on Ivan Menjivar (4-5). Easton will look to use a 6-inch reach edge to control distance.

Easton carries a modest Elo edge (1018 to 958), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Easton's striker game against Menjivar's wrestler approach. Easton brings a versatile approach, while Menjivar looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Easton throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Easton is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Easton has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mike Easton over Ivan Menjivar. The model gives Easton a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

66%
Melvin Guillard
Guillard
12-9
CO-III1260
All-Rounder
VS
Camoes
1-4-1
PR-I870
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Lightweight matchup features Melvin Guillard (12-9) taking on Fabricio Camoes (1-4-1).

Guillard is rated at 1260 — 390 points above Camoes's 870. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Guillard's striker game against Camoes's wrestler approach. Guillard brings a versatile approach, while Camoes looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Guillard throws significantly more leather — a 4.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Camoes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.7 more per 15 minutes. Guillard has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Melvin Guillard over Fabricio Camoes. We're leaning Guillard here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

52%
Khabib Nurmagomedov
Nurmagomedov
13-0
CH-I2088
Wrestler
VS
Tibau
16-12
RK-I1163
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Lightweight matchup features Khabib Nurmagomedov (13-0) taking on Gleison Tibau (16-12).

Nurmagomedov is rated at 2088 — 925 points above Tibau's 1163. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Nurmagomedov rides a 12-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nurmagomedov throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Nurmagomedov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Tibau has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Khabib Nurmagomedov over Gleison Tibau. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Nurmagomedov at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

59%
Constantinos Philippou
Philippou
6-4
CO-III1265
Striker
VS
Fukuda
2-3
MC-I982
Over/UnderUnder 55%
Under 55%Over 45%

The Middleweight matchup features Constantinos Philippou (6-4) taking on Riki Fukuda (2-3).

Philippou is rated at 1265 — 283 points above Fukuda's 982. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fukuda throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Fukuda is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.6 more per 15 minutes. Fukuda has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Constantinos Philippou over Riki Fukuda. The model gives Philippou a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

54%
John Alessio
Roller
2-4
PR-I886
Wrestler
VS
Alessio
0-5
UC-I770
Over/UnderOver 60%
Under 40%Over 60%

The Lightweight matchup features Shane Roller (2-4) taking on John Alessio (0-5).

There's a real Elo separation here: Roller at 886 versus Alessio at 770. That 116-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Roller throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Roller is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Roller has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: John Alessio over Shane Roller. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Alessio at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

59%
Rafaello Oliveira
Oliveira
2-6
PR-II840
Wrestler
VS
Izquierdo
0-2
UC-II719
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Lightweight matchup features Rafaello Oliveira (2-6) taking on Yoislandy Izquierdo (0-2).

There's a real Elo separation here: Oliveira at 840 versus Izquierdo at 719. That 121-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Izquierdo throws significantly more leather — a 3.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Oliveira is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.5 more per 15 minutes. Oliveira has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rafaello Oliveira over Yoislandy Izquierdo. The model gives Oliveira a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.