UFC 137: Penn vs Diaz: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, October 29, 2011·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

UFC 137: Penn vs Diaz lands on Saturday, October 29, 2011 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Nick Diaz vs BJ PennWelterweightBJ PennLean55%
Cheick Kongo vs Matt MitrioneHeavyweightCheick KongoToss-up52%
Roy Nelson vs Mirko FilipovicHeavyweightRoy NelsonToss-up51%
Scott Jorgensen vs Jeff CurranBantamweightScott JorgensenLean57%
Hatsu Hioki vs George RoopFeatherweightGeorge RoopToss-up54%
Donald Cerrone vs Dennis SiverLightweightDonald CerroneLean56%
Bart Palaszewski vs Tyson GriffinFeatherweightTyson GriffinLean56%
Brandon Vera vs Eliot MarshallLight HeavyweightEliot MarshallLean58%
Ramsey Nijem vs Danny DownesLightweightRamsey NijemConfident65%
Francis Carmont vs Chris CamozziMiddleweightChris CamozziLean60%
Clifford Starks vs Dustin JacobyMiddleweightDustin JacobyLean59%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Nick Diaz vs BJ Penn

Welterweight
55%
BJ Penn
Diaz
7-6
Elo 1185
All-Rounder
VS
Penn
12-12-2
Elo 938
All-Rounder

The Welterweight matchup features Nick Diaz (7-6) taking on BJ Penn (12-12-2). Diaz is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Diaz is rated at 1185 — 247 points above Penn's 938. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Diaz looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Penn is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Diaz the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Diaz throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Diaz is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Penn has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: BJ Penn over Nick Diaz.** The model gives Penn a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

52%
Cheick Kongo
Kongo
11-5-1
Elo 1183
Striker
VS
Mitrione
9-4
Elo 1200
Striker

The Heavyweight matchup features Cheick Kongo (11-5-1) taking on Matt Mitrione (9-4).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Kongo at 1183, Mitrione at 1200. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

The style clash matters here: Kongo brings a versatile approach, while Mitrione is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 54% win rate against strikers, giving Mitrione the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mitrione throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Kongo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.3 more per 15 minutes. Mitrione has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Cheick Kongo over Matt Mitrione.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Kongo at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

51%
Roy Nelson
Nelson
9-9
Elo 1129
Striker
VS
Filipovic
4-6
Elo 1145
Knockout Artist

The Heavyweight matchup features Roy Nelson (9-9) taking on Mirko Filipovic (4-6).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Nelson at 1129, Filipovic at 1145. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

The style clash matters here: Nelson brings a versatile approach, while Filipovic is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 54% win rate against strikers, giving Filipovic the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nelson throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Nelson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Filipovic has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Roy Nelson over Mirko Filipovic.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Nelson at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

57%
Scott Jorgensen
Jorgensen
4-7
Elo 735
Wrestler
VS
Curran
0-2
Elo 792

The Bantamweight matchup features Scott Jorgensen (4-7) taking on Jeff Curran (0-2). Curran will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Curran carries a modest Elo edge (792 to 735), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jorgensen throws significantly more leather — a 3.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Jorgensen is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.7 more per 15 minutes. Jorgensen has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Scott Jorgensen over Jeff Curran.** The model gives Jorgensen a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

Hatsu Hioki vs George Roop

Featherweight
54%
George Roop
Hioki
3-4
Elo 875
All-Rounder
VS
Roop
5-7
Elo 881
All-Rounder

The Featherweight matchup features Hatsu Hioki (3-4) taking on George Roop (5-7).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Hioki at 875, Roop at 881. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Stylistically this is Hioki's all-rounder game against Roop's striker approach. Hioki is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Roop brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Roop throws significantly more leather — a 3.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Roop is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Hioki has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: George Roop over Hatsu Hioki.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Roop at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

56%
Donald Cerrone
Cerrone
23-13
Elo 1054
All-Rounder
VS
Siver
11-8
Elo 1214
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Donald Cerrone (23-13) taking on Dennis Siver (11-8). Cerrone is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Siver is rated at 1214 — 160 points above Cerrone's 1054. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cerrone throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Cerrone is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Siver has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Donald Cerrone over Dennis Siver.** The model gives Cerrone a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

56%
Tyson Griffin
Palaszewski
1-2
Elo 863
VS
Griffin
8-5
Elo 925
All-Rounder

The Featherweight matchup features Bart Palaszewski (1-2) taking on Tyson Griffin (8-5). Palaszewski is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Griffin carries a modest Elo edge (925 to 863), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Griffin throws significantly more leather — a 3.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Griffin is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.2 more per 15 minutes. Palaszewski has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Tyson Griffin over Bart Palaszewski.** The model gives Griffin a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

Brandon Vera vs Eliot Marshall

Light Heavyweight
58%
Eliot Marshall
Vera
8-6
Elo 945
All-Rounder
VS
Marshall
3-2
Elo 889
All-Rounder

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Brandon Vera (8-6) taking on Eliot Marshall (3-2).

Vera carries a modest Elo edge (945 to 889), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Vera's knockout artist game against Marshall's all-rounder approach. Vera is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Marshall is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Vera throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Vera is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Marshall has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Eliot Marshall over Brandon Vera.** The model gives Marshall a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

65%
Ramsey Nijem
Nijem
5-4
Elo 944
Wrestler
VS
Downes
0-1
Elo 864

The Lightweight matchup features Ramsey Nijem (5-4) taking on Danny Downes (0-1). Nijem will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Nijem carries a modest Elo edge (944 to 864), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nijem throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Downes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Nijem has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Ramsey Nijem over Danny Downes.** We're leaning Nijem here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

60%
Chris Camozzi
Carmont
6-2
Elo 1167
All-Rounder
VS
Camozzi
9-9
Elo 986
All-Rounder

The Middleweight matchup features Francis Carmont (6-2) taking on Chris Camozzi (9-9). Carmont will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Carmont is rated at 1167 — 181 points above Camozzi's 986. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Camozzi throws significantly more leather — a 4.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Camozzi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Carmont has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Chris Camozzi over Francis Carmont.** The model gives Camozzi a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

59%
Dustin Jacoby
Starks
1-1
Elo 898
VS
Jacoby
9-6-1
Elo 1374
Striker

The Middleweight matchup features Clifford Starks (1-1) taking on Dustin Jacoby (9-6-1). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Jacoby.

Jacoby is rated at 1374 — 476 points above Starks's 898. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jacoby throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Jacoby is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Jacoby has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Dustin Jacoby over Clifford Starks.** The model gives Jacoby a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.