UFC 125: Resolution: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, January 1, 2011·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 125: Resolution lands on Saturday, January 1, 2011 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 11 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Frankie Edgar vs Gray MaynardLightweightFrankie EdgarLean59%
Brian Stann vs Chris LebenMiddleweightChris LebenToss-up53%
Brandon Vera vs Thiago SilvaLight HeavyweightThiago SilvaConfident67%
Dong Hyun Kim vs Nate DiazWelterweightNate DiazLean63%
Clay Guida vs Takanori GomiLightweightClay GuidaConfident72%
Jeremy Stephens vs Marcus DavisLightweightJeremy StephensConfident70%
Dustin Poirier vs Josh GrispiFeatherweightDustin PoirierToss-up50%
Brad Tavares vs Phil BaroniMiddleweightBrad TavaresStrong84%
Diego Nunes vs Mike BrownFeatherweightDiego NunesToss-up51%
Daniel Roberts vs Greg SotoWelterweightDaniel RobertsLean58%
Jacob Volkmann vs Antonio McKeeLightweightJacob VolkmannStrong87%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Frankie Edgar vs Gray Maynard

LightweightTitle Fight
59%
Frankie Edgar
Edgar
18-10-1
Elo 1185
All-Rounder
VS
Maynard
11-6-1
Elo 975
Wrestler

The Lightweight championship matchup features Frankie Edgar (18-10-1) taking on Gray Maynard (11-6-1). Maynard is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Edgar is rated at 1185 — 211 points above Maynard's 975. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Edgar throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Maynard is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Edgar has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Frankie Edgar over Gray Maynard. The model gives Edgar a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

Brian Stann vs Chris Leben

Middleweight
53%
Chris Leben
Stann
6-4
Elo 1077
Knockout Artist
VS
Leben
12-9
Elo 855
All-Rounder

The Middleweight matchup features Brian Stann (6-4) taking on Chris Leben (12-9).

Stann is rated at 1077 — 222 points above Leben's 855. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Stann's all-rounder game against Leben's knockout artist approach. Stann is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Leben is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Leben throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Leben is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Stann has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chris Leben over Brian Stann. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Leben at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Brandon Vera vs Thiago Silva

Light Heavyweight
67%
Thiago Silva
Vera
8-6
Elo 945
All-Rounder
VS
Silva
6-3
Elo 1362
Knockout Artist

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Brandon Vera (8-6) taking on Thiago Silva (6-3). Vera will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Silva is rated at 1362 — 417 points above Vera's 945. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Knockout Artist" archetype — precision strikers who sit back, pick their shots, and carry fight-ending power. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Vera throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Vera is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Silva has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Thiago Silva over Brandon Vera. We're leaning Silva here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Dong Hyun Kim vs Nate Diaz

Welterweight
63%
Nate Diaz
Kim
13-3
Elo 1318
All-Rounder
VS
Diaz
15-11
Elo 1557
All-Rounder

The Welterweight matchup features Dong Hyun Kim (13-3) taking on Nate Diaz (15-11).

Diaz is rated at 1557 — 239 points above Kim's 1318. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Kim rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Kim is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Diaz looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Diaz the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Diaz throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Kim is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.7 more per 15 minutes. Diaz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Nate Diaz over Dong Hyun Kim. The model gives Diaz a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

72%
Clay Guida
Guida
18-18
Elo 926
All-Rounder
VS
Gomi
4-8
Elo 732
Striker

The Lightweight matchup features Clay Guida (18-18) taking on Takanori Gomi (4-8).

Guida is rated at 926 — 194 points above Gomi's 732. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Guida's wrestler game against Gomi's striker approach. Guida looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Gomi brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Guida throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Guida is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Gomi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Clay Guida over Takanori Gomi. We're leaning Guida here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

70%
Jeremy Stephens
Stephens
15-18
Elo 941
Striker
VS
Davis
9-5
Elo 1032
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Jeremy Stephens (15-18) taking on Marcus Davis (9-5).

There's a real Elo separation here: Davis at 1032 versus Stephens at 941. That 91-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Stephens's striker game against Davis's all-rounder approach. Stephens brings a versatile approach, while Davis is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Stephens throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Stephens is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Davis has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jeremy Stephens over Marcus Davis. We're leaning Stephens here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Dustin Poirier vs Josh Grispi

Featherweight
50%
Dustin Poirier
Poirier
22-8
Elo 1681
Knockout Artist
VS
Grispi
0-3
Elo 687

The Featherweight matchup features Dustin Poirier (22-8) taking on Josh Grispi (0-3). Grispi is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Poirier is rated at 1681 — 994 points above Grispi's 687. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Grispi throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Grispi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Grispi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dustin Poirier over Josh Grispi. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Poirier at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Brad Tavares vs Phil Baroni

Middleweight
84%
Brad Tavares
Tavares
16-10
Elo 925
Striker
VS
Baroni
3-6
Elo 762
Striker

The Middleweight matchup features Brad Tavares (16-10) taking on Phil Baroni (3-6). Tavares is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Tavares is rated at 925 — 163 points above Baroni's 762. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Baroni throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Tavares is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Tavares has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brad Tavares over Phil Baroni. The model is firm on this one: Tavares at 84%.

Diego Nunes vs Mike Brown

Featherweight
51%
Diego Nunes
Nunes
3-2
Elo 1047
Striker
VS
Brown
2-3
Elo 982
Striker

The Featherweight matchup features Diego Nunes (3-2) taking on Mike Brown (2-3). Brown will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Nunes carries a modest Elo edge (1047 to 982), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Brown throws significantly more leather — a 3.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Brown is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.3 more per 15 minutes. Nunes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Diego Nunes over Mike Brown. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Nunes at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Daniel Roberts vs Greg Soto

Welterweight
58%
Daniel Roberts
Roberts
3-3
Elo 974
Wrestler
VS
Soto
1-1
Elo 1013

The Welterweight matchup features Daniel Roberts (3-3) taking on Greg Soto (1-1).

Soto carries a modest Elo edge (1013 to 974), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Soto throws significantly more leather — a 2.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Roberts is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.9 more per 15 minutes. Roberts has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Daniel Roberts over Greg Soto. The model gives Roberts a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

87%
Jacob Volkmann
Volkmann
6-3
Elo 1028
Wrestler
VS
McKee
0-0
Elo 949

The Lightweight matchup features Jacob Volkmann (6-3) taking on Antonio McKee (0-0).

Volkmann carries a modest Elo edge (1028 to 949), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Volkmann throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Volkmann is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.7 more per 15 minutes. McKee has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jacob Volkmann over Antonio McKee. The model is firm on this one: Volkmann at 87%.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.