UFC: Silva vs Irvin: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, July 19, 2008·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

UFC: Silva vs Irvin lands on Saturday, July 19, 2008 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Anderson Silva vs James IrvinLight HeavyweightAnderson SilvaStrong76%
Brandon Vera vs Reese AndyLight HeavyweightBrandon VeraStrong76%
Frankie Edgar vs Hermes FrancaLightweightFrankie EdgarConfident73%
Cain Velasquez vs Jake O'BrienHeavyweightCain VelasquezLean58%
Kevin Burns vs Anthony JohnsonWelterweightAnthony JohnsonLean59%
CB Dollaway vs Jesse TaylorMiddleweightCB DollawayToss-up54%
Tim Credeur vs Cale YarbroughMiddleweightCale YarbroughConfident69%
Rory Markham vs Brodie FarberWelterweightBrodie FarberToss-up53%
Nate Loughran vs Johnny ReesMiddleweightJohnny ReesLean59%
Brad Blackburn vs James GibooWelterweightJames GibooToss-up54%
Shannon Gugerty vs Dale HarttLightweightShannon GugertyToss-up53%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Anderson Silva vs James Irvin

Light Heavyweight
76%
Anderson Silva
Silva
17-6
Elo 1154
All-Rounder
VS
Irvin
4-5
Elo 855
Knockout Artist

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Anderson Silva (17-6) taking on James Irvin (4-5).

Silva is rated at 1154 — 299 points above Irvin's 855. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Knockout Artist" archetype — precision strikers who sit back, pick their shots, and carry fight-ending power. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Silva throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Silva is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Silva has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Anderson Silva over James Irvin.** The model is firm on this one: Silva at 76%.

Brandon Vera vs Reese Andy

Light Heavyweight
76%
Brandon Vera
Vera
8-6
Elo 945
All-Rounder
VS
Andy
0-1
Elo 901

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Brandon Vera (8-6) taking on Reese Andy (0-1).

Vera carries a modest Elo edge (945 to 901), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Vera throws significantly more leather — a 4.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Vera is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Andy has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Brandon Vera over Reese Andy.** The model is firm on this one: Vera at 76%.

73%
Frankie Edgar
Edgar
18-10-1
Elo 1185
All-Rounder
VS
Franca
6-4
Elo 1107
Wrestler

The Lightweight matchup features Frankie Edgar (18-10-1) taking on Hermes Franca (6-4). Franca will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Edgar carries a modest Elo edge (1185 to 1107), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Edgar is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Franca looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Franca the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Edgar throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Edgar is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.1 more per 15 minutes. Edgar has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Frankie Edgar over Hermes Franca.** We're leaning Edgar here at 73%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

58%
Cain Velasquez
Velasquez
12-2
Elo 1589
Submission Artist
VS
O'Brien
4-2
Elo 1002
Wrestler

The Heavyweight matchup features Cain Velasquez (12-2) taking on Jake O'Brien (4-2).

Velasquez is rated at 1589 — 587 points above O'Brien's 1002. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Velasquez is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while O'Brien looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 56% win rate against submission artists, giving O'Brien the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Velasquez throws significantly more leather — a 15.4 sig. strike per minute gap. O'Brien is far more active with takedowns, averaging 7.0 more per 15 minutes. Velasquez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Cain Velasquez over Jake O'Brien.** The model gives Velasquez a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

59%
Anthony Johnson
Burns
2-2
Elo 855
VS
Johnson
13-5
Elo 1708
Striker

The Welterweight matchup features Kevin Burns (2-2) taking on Anthony Johnson (13-5). Johnson is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Johnson is rated at 1708 — 853 points above Burns's 855. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Johnson has won 3 straight.

A few statistical edges stand out. Johnson throws significantly more leather — a 3.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Johnson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Johnson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Anthony Johnson over Kevin Burns.** The model gives Johnson a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

CB Dollaway vs Jesse Taylor

Middleweight
54%
CB Dollaway
Dollaway
11-8
Elo 965
Wrestler
VS
Taylor
0-1
Elo 949

The Middleweight matchup features CB Dollaway (11-8) taking on Jesse Taylor (0-1). Dollaway is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Dollaway at 965, Taylor at 949. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dollaway throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Dollaway is far more active with takedowns, averaging 5.0 more per 15 minutes. Taylor has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: CB Dollaway over Jesse Taylor.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Dollaway at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

69%
Cale Yarbrough
Credeur
3-1
Elo 1018
VS
Yarbrough
0-0
Elo 873

The Middleweight matchup features Tim Credeur (3-1) taking on Cale Yarbrough (0-0).

There's a real Elo separation here: Credeur at 1018 versus Yarbrough at 873. That 145-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Yarbrough throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Yarbrough is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Yarbrough has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Cale Yarbrough over Tim Credeur.** We're leaning Yarbrough here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

53%
Brodie Farber
Markham
1-1
Elo 943
VS
Farber
0-1
Elo 824

The Welterweight matchup features Rory Markham (1-1) taking on Brodie Farber (0-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Markham at 943 versus Farber at 824. That 119-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Farber throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Farber is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Farber has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Brodie Farber over Rory Markham.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Farber at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Nate Loughran vs Johnny Rees

Middleweight
59%
Johnny Rees
Loughran
1-0
Elo 989
VS
Rees
0-1
Elo 786

The Middleweight matchup features Nate Loughran (1-0) taking on Johnny Rees (0-1).

Loughran is rated at 989 — 203 points above Rees's 786. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rees throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Rees is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Rees has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Johnny Rees over Nate Loughran.** The model gives Rees a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

54%
James Giboo
Blackburn
3-1
Elo 943
VS
Giboo
0-0
Elo 873

The Welterweight matchup features Brad Blackburn (3-1) taking on James Giboo (0-0).

Blackburn carries a modest Elo edge (943 to 873), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Giboo throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Giboo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Giboo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: James Giboo over Brad Blackburn.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Giboo at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

53%
Shannon Gugerty
Gugerty
2-2
Elo 971
VS
Hartt
1-1
Elo 903

The Lightweight matchup features Shannon Gugerty (2-2) taking on Dale Hartt (1-1).

Gugerty carries a modest Elo edge (971 to 903), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hartt throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Hartt is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Hartt has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Shannon Gugerty over Dale Hartt.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Gugerty at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.