UFC 80: Rapid Fire: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, January 19, 2008·Newcastle, England, United Kingdom
Published April 18, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 80: Rapid Fire lands on Saturday, January 19, 2008 in Newcastle, England, United Kingdom with 9 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
BJ Penn vs Joe StevensonLightweightJoe StevensonLean60%
Fabricio Werdum vs Gabriel GonzagaHeavyweightGabriel GonzagaToss-up52%
Marcus Davis vs Jess LiaudinWelterweightMarcus DavisConfident69%
Wilson Gouveia vs Jason LambertLight HeavyweightWilson GouveiaConfident67%
Jorge Rivera vs Kendall GroveMiddleweightKendall GroveConfident65%
Antoni Hardonk vs Colin RobinsonHeavyweightAntoni HardonkStrong81%
Paul Kelly vs Paul TaylorWelterweightPaul TaylorLean61%
Alessio Sakara vs James LeeLight HeavyweightAlessio SakaraStrong80%
Sam Stout vs Per EklundLightweightSam StoutLean58%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

BJ Penn vs Joe Stevenson

Lightweight
60%
Joe Stevenson
Penn
12-13-2
RK-I1142
All-Rounder
VS
Stevenson
8-8
RK-II1067
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 50%
Under 50%Over 50%

The Lightweight matchup features BJ Penn (12-13-2) taking on Joe Stevenson (8-8).

Penn carries a modest Elo edge (1142 to 1067), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Penn's knockout artist game against Stevenson's submission artist approach. Penn is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Stevenson is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Stevenson throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Stevenson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Stevenson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Joe Stevenson over BJ Penn. The model gives Stevenson a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

52%
Gabriel Gonzaga
Werdum
12-6
CH-III1625
Wrestler
VS
Gonzaga
12-10
RK-II1072
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 64%
Under 64%Over 36%

The Heavyweight matchup features Fabricio Werdum (12-6) taking on Gabriel Gonzaga (12-10).

Werdum is rated at 1625 — 553 points above Gonzaga's 1072. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Werdum's wrestler game against Gonzaga's knockout artist approach. Werdum looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Gonzaga is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Gonzaga throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Gonzaga is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Werdum has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Gabriel Gonzaga over Fabricio Werdum. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Gonzaga at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Marcus Davis vs Jess Liaudin

Welterweight
69%
Marcus Davis
Davis
9-6
RK-I1150
All-Rounder
VS
Liaudin
2-3
MC-III925
Over/UnderUnder 54%
Under 54%Over 46%

The Welterweight matchup features Marcus Davis (9-6) taking on Jess Liaudin (2-3).

Davis is rated at 1150 — 225 points above Liaudin's 925. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Liaudin throws significantly more leather — a 3.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Davis is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.3 more per 15 minutes. Davis has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Marcus Davis over Jess Liaudin. We're leaning Davis here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Wilson Gouveia vs Jason Lambert

Light Heavyweight
67%
Wilson Gouveia
Gouveia
6-4
RK-II1088
Submission Artist
VS
Lambert
4-4
MC-II942
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderUnder 64%
Under 64%Over 36%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Wilson Gouveia (6-4) taking on Jason Lambert (4-4).

There's a real Elo separation here: Gouveia at 1088 versus Lambert at 942. That 146-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Gouveia's submission artist game against Lambert's knockout artist approach. Gouveia is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Lambert is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lambert throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Gouveia is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Gouveia has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Wilson Gouveia over Jason Lambert. We're leaning Gouveia here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

65%
Kendall Grove
Rivera
8-7
CO-III1203
Striker
VS
Grove
7-6
RK-II1085
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderUnder 54%
Under 54%Over 46%

The Middleweight matchup features Jorge Rivera (8-7) taking on Kendall Grove (7-6). Grove is the bigger frame at 6'6" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Rivera at 1203 versus Grove at 1085. That 118-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

The style clash matters here: Rivera brings a versatile approach, while Grove is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Grove the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rivera throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Grove is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Rivera has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kendall Grove over Jorge Rivera. We're leaning Grove here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

81%
Antoni Hardonk
Hardonk
4-4
MC-II943
Knockout Artist
VS
Robinson
0-2
UC-III648
Over/UnderUnder 69%
Under 69%Over 31%

The Heavyweight matchup features Antoni Hardonk (4-4) taking on Colin Robinson (0-2).

Hardonk is rated at 943 — 295 points above Robinson's 648. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Robinson throws significantly more leather — a 4.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Robinson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.7 more per 15 minutes. Hardonk has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Antoni Hardonk over Colin Robinson. The model is firm on this one: Hardonk at 81%.

Paul Kelly vs Paul Taylor

Welterweight
61%
Paul Taylor
Kelly
5-4
RK-III1027
Wrestler
VS
Taylor
4-5
RK-II1070
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Welterweight matchup features Paul Kelly (5-4) taking on Paul Taylor (4-5). Taylor is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Taylor carries a modest Elo edge (1070 to 1027), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Kelly looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Taylor is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Kelly the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Taylor throws significantly more leather — a 6.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Taylor is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Kelly has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Paul Taylor over Paul Kelly. The model gives Taylor a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

Alessio Sakara vs James Lee

Light Heavyweight
80%
Alessio Sakara
Sakara
6-8
RK-III1016
Striker
VS
Lee
0-1
PR-III811
Over/UnderUnder 61%
Under 61%Over 39%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Alessio Sakara (6-8) taking on James Lee (0-1).

Sakara is rated at 1016 — 206 points above Lee's 811. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sakara throws significantly more leather — a 4.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Sakara is far more active with takedowns, averaging 6.2 more per 15 minutes. Lee has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alessio Sakara over James Lee. The model is firm on this one: Sakara at 80%.

Sam Stout vs Per Eklund

Lightweight
58%
Sam Stout
Stout
9-11
PR-I875
All-Rounder
VS
Eklund
1-2
PR-III810
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Lightweight matchup features Sam Stout (9-11) taking on Per Eklund (1-2).

Stout carries a modest Elo edge (875 to 810), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Stout throws significantly more leather — a 4.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Eklund is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Eklund has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Sam Stout over Per Eklund. The model gives Stout a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.