UFC Fight Night: Evans vs Salmon: Predictions & Analysis

Thursday, January 25, 2007·Hollywood, Florida, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Evans vs Salmon lands on Thursday, January 25, 2007 in Hollywood, Florida, USA with 8 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Rashad Evans vs Sean SalmonLight HeavyweightRashad EvansStrong84%
Jake O'Brien vs Heath HerringHeavyweightJake O'BrienConfident72%
Hermes Franca vs Spencer FisherLightweightHermes FrancaLean59%
Nate Marquardt vs Dean ListerMiddleweightNate MarquardtLean62%
Joshua Burkman vs Chad ReinerWelterweightJoshua BurkmanStrong78%
Ed Herman vs Chris PriceMiddleweightEd HermanLean62%
Din Thomas vs Clay GuidaLightweightClay GuidaToss-up51%
Rich Clementi vs Ross PointonWelterweightRich ClementiToss-up52%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Rashad Evans vs Sean Salmon

Light Heavyweight
84%
Rashad Evans
Evans
14-7-1
Elo 1121
Striker
VS
Salmon
0-1
Elo 867

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Rashad Evans (14-7-1) taking on Sean Salmon (0-1).

Evans is rated at 1121 — 254 points above Salmon's 867. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Evans throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Evans is far more active with takedowns, averaging 6.9 more per 15 minutes. Salmon has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rashad Evans over Sean Salmon. The model is firm on this one: Evans at 84%.

72%
Jake O'Brien
O'Brien
4-2
Elo 1002
Wrestler
VS
Herring
2-2
Elo 932

The Heavyweight matchup features Jake O'Brien (4-2) taking on Heath Herring (2-2).

O'Brien carries a modest Elo edge (1002 to 932), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. O'Brien throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. O'Brien is far more active with takedowns, averaging 9.3 more per 15 minutes. Herring has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jake O'Brien over Heath Herring. We're leaning O'Brien here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

59%
Hermes Franca
Franca
6-4
Elo 1107
Wrestler
VS
Fisher
9-7
Elo 876
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Hermes Franca (6-4) taking on Spencer Fisher (9-7). Franca will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Franca is rated at 1107 — 232 points above Fisher's 876. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Franca's wrestler game against Fisher's knockout artist approach. Franca looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Fisher is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fisher throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Franca is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Fisher has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Hermes Franca over Spencer Fisher. The model gives Franca a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

62%
Nate Marquardt
Marquardt
13-11
Elo 1064
All-Rounder
VS
Lister
4-1
Elo 1214
Wrestler

The Middleweight matchup features Nate Marquardt (13-11) taking on Dean Lister (4-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Lister at 1214 versus Marquardt at 1064. That 150-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

The style clash matters here: Marquardt is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Lister looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Lister the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Marquardt throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Lister is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Marquardt has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Nate Marquardt over Dean Lister. The model gives Marquardt a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

78%
Joshua Burkman
Burkman
6-11
Elo 743
Wrestler
VS
Reiner
0-1
Elo 846

The Welterweight matchup features Joshua Burkman (6-11) taking on Chad Reiner (0-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Reiner at 846 versus Burkman at 743. That 103-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Burkman throws significantly more leather — a 2.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Burkman is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.4 more per 15 minutes. Reiner has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Joshua Burkman over Chad Reiner. The model is firm on this one: Burkman at 78%.

Ed Herman vs Chris Price

Middleweight
62%
Ed Herman
Herman
13-11
Elo 1045
All-Rounder
VS
Price
0-1
Elo 770

The Middleweight matchup features Ed Herman (13-11) taking on Chris Price (0-1).

Herman is rated at 1045 — 275 points above Price's 770. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Herman throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Herman is far more active with takedowns, averaging 5.1 more per 15 minutes. Price has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ed Herman over Chris Price. The model gives Herman a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

Din Thomas vs Clay Guida

Lightweight
51%
Clay Guida
Thomas
5-3
Elo 1012
Wrestler
VS
Guida
18-18
Elo 926
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Din Thomas (5-3) taking on Clay Guida (18-18).

There's a real Elo separation here: Thomas at 1012 versus Guida at 926. That 86-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

The style clash matters here: Thomas looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Guida is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Thomas the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Guida throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Guida is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Guida has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Clay Guida over Din Thomas. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Guida at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

52%
Rich Clementi
Clementi
5-4
Elo 1034
Wrestler
VS
Pointon
0-1
Elo 761

The Welterweight matchup features Rich Clementi (5-4) taking on Ross Pointon (0-1).

Clementi is rated at 1034 — 273 points above Pointon's 761. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pointon throws significantly more leather — a 3.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Clementi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Clementi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rich Clementi over Ross Pointon. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Clementi at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.