The Ultimate Fighter: Team Ortiz vs. Team Shamrock Finale: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, June 24, 2006·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

The Ultimate Fighter: Team Ortiz vs. Team Shamrock Finale lands on Saturday, June 24, 2006 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 9 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Kenny Florian vs Sam StoutLightweightKenny FlorianToss-up53%
Michael Bisping vs Josh HaynesLight HeavyweightJosh HaynesToss-up51%
Kendall Grove vs Ed HermanMiddleweightEd HermanToss-up53%
Keith Jardine vs Wilson GouveiaLight HeavyweightKeith JardineLean57%
Rory Singer vs Ross PointonMiddleweightRoss PointonToss-up54%
Kalib Starnes vs Danny AbbadiMiddleweightDanny AbbadiLean63%
Luigi Fioravanti vs Solomon HutchersonMiddleweightLuigi FioravantiStrong79%
Matt Hamill vs Jesse ForbesLight HeavyweightJesse ForbesLean60%
Mike Nickels vs Wes CombsLight HeavyweightWes CombsLean58%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Kenny Florian vs Sam Stout

Lightweight
53%
Kenny Florian
Florian
12-4
Elo 1304
Wrestler
VS
Stout
9-10
Elo 756
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Kenny Florian (12-4) taking on Sam Stout (9-10). Florian will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Florian is rated at 1304 — 548 points above Stout's 756. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Florian looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Stout is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Florian the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Stout throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Florian is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.7 more per 15 minutes. Stout has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kenny Florian over Sam Stout. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Florian at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Michael Bisping vs Josh Haynes

Light Heavyweight
51%
Josh Haynes
Bisping
20-8
Elo 1522
Striker
VS
Haynes
0-2
Elo 746

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Michael Bisping (20-8) taking on Josh Haynes (0-2).

Bisping is rated at 1522 — 776 points above Haynes's 746. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Haynes throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Haynes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Haynes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Josh Haynes over Michael Bisping. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Haynes at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Kendall Grove vs Ed Herman

Middleweight
53%
Ed Herman
Grove
7-5
Elo 994
Knockout Artist
VS
Herman
13-11
Elo 1045
All-Rounder

The Middleweight matchup features Kendall Grove (7-5) taking on Ed Herman (13-11). Grove is the bigger frame at 6'6" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Herman carries a modest Elo edge (1045 to 994), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Grove's knockout artist game against Herman's all-rounder approach. Grove is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Herman is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Herman throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Herman is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Herman has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ed Herman over Kendall Grove. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Herman at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Keith Jardine vs Wilson Gouveia

Light Heavyweight
57%
Keith Jardine
Jardine
6-6
Elo 950
Striker
VS
Gouveia
6-3
Elo 1030
Submission Artist

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Keith Jardine (6-6) taking on Wilson Gouveia (6-3).

Gouveia carries a modest Elo edge (1030 to 950), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Jardine's striker game against Gouveia's submission artist approach. Jardine brings a versatile approach, while Gouveia is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jardine throws significantly more leather — a 3.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Gouveia is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Gouveia has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Keith Jardine over Wilson Gouveia. The model gives Jardine a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

Rory Singer vs Ross Pointon

Middleweight
54%
Ross Pointon
Singer
2-1
Elo 961
VS
Pointon
0-1
Elo 761

The Middleweight matchup features Rory Singer (2-1) taking on Ross Pointon (0-1).

Singer is rated at 961 — 200 points above Pointon's 761. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pointon throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Pointon is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Pointon has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ross Pointon over Rory Singer. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Pointon at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

63%
Danny Abbadi
Starnes
2-2
Elo 936
VS
Abbadi
0-1
Elo 835

The Middleweight matchup features Kalib Starnes (2-2) taking on Danny Abbadi (0-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Starnes at 936 versus Abbadi at 835. That 101-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Abbadi throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Abbadi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Abbadi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Danny Abbadi over Kalib Starnes. The model gives Abbadi a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

79%
Luigi Fioravanti
Fioravanti
4-4
Elo 987
Wrestler
VS
Hutcherson
0-0
Elo 862

The Middleweight matchup features Luigi Fioravanti (4-4) taking on Solomon Hutcherson (0-0).

There's a real Elo separation here: Fioravanti at 987 versus Hutcherson at 862. That 126-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fioravanti throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Hutcherson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Hutcherson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Luigi Fioravanti over Solomon Hutcherson. The model is firm on this one: Fioravanti at 79%.

Matt Hamill vs Jesse Forbes

Light Heavyweight
60%
Jesse Forbes
Hamill
10-4
Elo 1150
Striker
VS
Forbes
0-2
Elo 725

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Matt Hamill (10-4) taking on Jesse Forbes (0-2).

Hamill is rated at 1150 — 425 points above Forbes's 725. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Forbes throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Forbes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Forbes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jesse Forbes over Matt Hamill. The model gives Forbes a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Mike Nickels vs Wes Combs

Light Heavyweight
58%
Wes Combs
Nickels
1-0
Elo 984
VS
Combs
0-1
Elo 794

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Mike Nickels (1-0) taking on Wes Combs (0-1).

Nickels is rated at 984 — 190 points above Combs's 794. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Combs throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Combs is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Combs has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Wes Combs over Mike Nickels. The model gives Combs a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.