UFC 54: Boiling Point: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, August 20, 2005·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 54: Boiling Point lands on Saturday, August 20, 2005 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 8 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Chuck Liddell vs Jeremy HornLight HeavyweightJeremy HornLean63%
Tim Sylvia vs Tra TelligmanHeavyweightTim SylviaStrong87%
Randy Couture vs Mike van ArsdaleLight HeavyweightRandy CoutureStrong78%
Diego Sanchez vs Brian GassawayWelterweightDiego SanchezStrong87%
Georges St-Pierre vs Frank TriggWelterweightGeorges St-PierreStrong79%
Matt Lindland vs Joe DoerksenMiddleweightMatt LindlandLean62%
Trevor Prangley vs Travis LutterMiddleweightTrevor PrangleyToss-up50%
James Irvin vs Terry MartinLight HeavyweightJames IrvinLean55%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Chuck Liddell vs Jeremy Horn

Light HeavyweightTitle Fight
63%
Jeremy Horn
Liddell
16-6
Elo 1035
Striker
VS
Horn
6-6
Elo 936
Wrestler

The Light Heavyweight championship matchup features Chuck Liddell (16-6) taking on Jeremy Horn (6-6).

There's a real Elo separation here: Liddell at 1035 versus Horn at 936. That 100-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Liddell's striker game against Horn's submission artist approach. Liddell brings a versatile approach, while Horn is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Liddell throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Horn is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Horn has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jeremy Horn over Chuck Liddell. The model gives Horn a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

87%
Tim Sylvia
Sylvia
9-3
Elo 1296
All-Rounder
VS
Telligman
1-3
Elo 848

The Heavyweight matchup features Tim Sylvia (9-3) taking on Tra Telligman (1-3).

Sylvia is rated at 1296 — 448 points above Telligman's 848. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sylvia throws significantly more leather — a 10.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Sylvia is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Telligman has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tim Sylvia over Tra Telligman. The model is firm on this one: Sylvia at 87%.

Randy Couture vs Mike van Arsdale

Light Heavyweight
78%
Randy Couture
Couture
16-7
Elo 1248
Wrestler
VS
Arsdale
2-1
Elo 1043

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Randy Couture (16-7) taking on Mike van Arsdale (2-1).

Couture is rated at 1248 — 205 points above Arsdale's 1043. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Couture rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Couture throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Couture is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Couture has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Randy Couture over Mike van Arsdale. The model is firm on this one: Couture at 78%.

87%
Diego Sanchez
Sanchez
19-12
Elo 1139
Striker
VS
Gassaway
0-0
Elo 917

The Welterweight matchup features Diego Sanchez (19-12) taking on Brian Gassaway (0-0).

Sanchez is rated at 1139 — 222 points above Gassaway's 917. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sanchez throws significantly more leather — a 5.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Sanchez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 5.3 more per 15 minutes. Gassaway has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Diego Sanchez over Brian Gassaway. The model is firm on this one: Sanchez at 87%.

79%
Georges St-Pierre
St-Pierre
19-2
Elo 2022
Wrestler
VS
Trigg
2-4
Elo 937
Submission Artist

The Welterweight matchup features Georges St-Pierre (19-2) taking on Frank Trigg (2-4). St-Pierre is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

St-Pierre is rated at 2022 — 1084 points above Trigg's 937. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. St-Pierre rides a 12-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: St-Pierre looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Trigg is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, wrestlers own a 56% win rate against submission artists, giving St-Pierre the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. St-Pierre throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. St-Pierre is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.4 more per 15 minutes. St-Pierre has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Georges St-Pierre over Frank Trigg. The model is firm on this one: St-Pierre at 79%.

62%
Matt Lindland
Lindland
8-3
Elo 1239
Wrestler
VS
Doerksen
2-6
Elo 925
Wrestler

The Middleweight matchup features Matt Lindland (8-3) taking on Joe Doerksen (2-6).

Lindland is rated at 1239 — 314 points above Doerksen's 925. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lindland throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Doerksen is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Lindland has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Matt Lindland over Joe Doerksen. The model gives Lindland a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

50%
Trevor Prangley
Prangley
2-1
Elo 932
VS
Lutter
2-3
Elo 966
All-Rounder

The Middleweight matchup features Trevor Prangley (2-1) taking on Travis Lutter (2-3).

Lutter carries a modest Elo edge (966 to 932), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Prangley throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Prangley is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.8 more per 15 minutes. Lutter has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Trevor Prangley over Travis Lutter. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Prangley at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

James Irvin vs Terry Martin

Light Heavyweight
55%
James Irvin
Irvin
4-5
Elo 855
Knockout Artist
VS
Martin
2-3
Elo 848
Striker

The Light Heavyweight matchup features James Irvin (4-5) taking on Terry Martin (2-3). Irvin is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Irvin at 855, Martin at 848. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

The style clash matters here: Irvin is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Martin brings a versatile approach. In our database, knockout artists own a 54% win rate against strikers, giving Irvin the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Irvin throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Martin is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Martin has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: James Irvin over Terry Martin. The model gives Irvin a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.

UFC 54: Boiling Point Predictions & Analysis | Haymaker