UFC Fight Night: Ankalaev vs. Walker 2: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, January 13, 2024·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

UFC Fight Night: Ankalaev vs. Walker 2 lands on Saturday, January 13, 2024 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Magomed Ankalaev vs Johnny WalkerLight HeavyweightMagomed AnkalaevLean57%
Jim Miller vs Gabriel BenitezLightweightJim MillerLean57%
Mario Bautista vs Ricky SimonBantamweightMario BautistaToss-up51%
Brunno Ferreira vs Phil HawesMiddleweightPhil HawesLean57%
Waldo Cortes Acosta vs Andrei ArlovskiHeavyweightWaldo Cortes AcostaStrong75%
Preston Parsons vs Matthew SemelsbergerWelterweightPreston ParsonsToss-up51%
Marcus McGhee vs Gaston BolanosBantamweightGaston BolanosLean62%
Farid Basharat vs Taylor LapilusBantamweightFarid BasharatLean58%
Jean Silva vs Westin WilsonFeatherweightJean SilvaLean60%
Nikolas Motta vs Tom NolanLightweightTom NolanConfident65%
Joshua Van vs Felipe BunesFlyweightJoshua VanStrong76%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Magomed Ankalaev vs Johnny Walker

Light Heavyweight
57%
Magomed Ankalaev
Ankalaev
12-1-1
Elo 1772
Striker
VS
Walker
7-6
Elo 1432
Knockout Artist

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Magomed Ankalaev (12-1-1) taking on Johnny Walker (7-6). Walker is the bigger frame at 6'6" with a 7-inch reach advantage.

Ankalaev is rated at 1772 — 341 points above Walker's 1432. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Ankalaev rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Ankalaev brings a versatile approach, while Walker is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 54% win rate against strikers, giving Walker the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Walker throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Walker is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Walker has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Magomed Ankalaev over Johnny Walker.** The model gives Ankalaev a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

57%
Jim Miller
Miller
27-17
Elo 1213
Knockout Artist
VS
Benitez
7-7
Elo 856
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Jim Miller (27-17) taking on Gabriel Benitez (7-7).

Miller is rated at 1213 — 357 points above Benitez's 856. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Miller's knockout artist game against Benitez's all-rounder approach. Miller is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Benitez is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Benitez throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Miller is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Benitez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Jim Miller over Gabriel Benitez.** The model gives Miller a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

51%
Mario Bautista
Bautista
10-3
Elo 1566
All-Rounder
VS
Simon
10-5
Elo 1223
All-Rounder

The Bantamweight matchup features Mario Bautista (10-3) taking on Ricky Simon (10-5). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Bautista.

Bautista is rated at 1566 — 342 points above Simon's 1223. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Bautista throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Simon is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Simon has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Mario Bautista over Ricky Simon.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Bautista at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

57%
Phil Hawes
Ferreira
5-2
Elo 1344
Submission Artist
VS
Hawes
4-3
Elo 827
All-Rounder

The Middleweight matchup features Brunno Ferreira (5-2) taking on Phil Hawes (4-3). Hawes is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Ferreira is rated at 1344 — 517 points above Hawes's 827. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Ferreira is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Hawes is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, submission artists own a 56% win rate against all-rounders, giving Ferreira the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hawes throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Hawes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Hawes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Phil Hawes over Brunno Ferreira.** The model gives Hawes a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

75%
Waldo Cortes Acosta
Acosta
9-2
Elo 1637
Striker
VS
Arlovski
23-17
Elo 858
All-Rounder

The Heavyweight matchup features Waldo Cortes Acosta (9-2) taking on Andrei Arlovski (23-17).

Acosta is rated at 1637 — 779 points above Arlovski's 858. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Acosta's striker game against Arlovski's all-rounder approach. Acosta brings a versatile approach, while Arlovski is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Acosta throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Arlovski is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Arlovski has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Waldo Cortes Acosta over Andrei Arlovski.** The model is firm on this one: Acosta at 75%.

51%
Preston Parsons
Parsons
2-3
Elo 867
Wrestler
VS
Semelsberger
5-5
Elo 861
Knockout Artist

The Welterweight matchup features Preston Parsons (2-3) taking on Matthew Semelsberger (5-5). Semelsberger is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Parsons at 867, Semelsberger at 861. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Stylistically this is Parsons's wrestler game against Semelsberger's striker approach. Parsons looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Semelsberger brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Parsons throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Parsons is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Semelsberger has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Preston Parsons over Matthew Semelsberger.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Parsons at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

62%
Gaston Bolanos
McGhee
4-0
Elo 1329
VS
Bolanos
2-1
Elo 867

The Bantamweight matchup features Marcus McGhee (4-0) taking on Gaston Bolanos (2-1).

McGhee is rated at 1329 — 463 points above Bolanos's 867. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. McGhee rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Bolanos throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Bolanos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. McGhee has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Gaston Bolanos over Marcus McGhee.** The model gives Bolanos a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

58%
Farid Basharat
Basharat
5-0
Elo 1459
Wrestler
VS
Lapilus
5-2
Elo 1238
All-Rounder

The Bantamweight matchup features Farid Basharat (5-0) taking on Taylor Lapilus (5-2).

Basharat is rated at 1459 — 220 points above Lapilus's 1238. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Basharat rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Basharat looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Lapilus is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Basharat the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lapilus throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Basharat is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.5 more per 15 minutes. Lapilus has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Farid Basharat over Taylor Lapilus.** The model gives Basharat a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Jean Silva vs Westin Wilson

Featherweight
60%
Jean Silva
Silva
5-1
Elo 1537
Knockout Artist
VS
Wilson
1-2
Elo 820

The Featherweight matchup features Jean Silva (5-1) taking on Westin Wilson (1-2). Wilson is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Silva is rated at 1537 — 717 points above Wilson's 820. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Wilson throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Wilson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Silva has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Jean Silva over Westin Wilson.** The model gives Silva a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Nikolas Motta vs Tom Nolan

Lightweight
65%
Tom Nolan
Motta
3-2
Elo 1072
Striker
VS
Nolan
3-1
Elo 1262

The Lightweight matchup features Nikolas Motta (3-2) taking on Tom Nolan (3-1). Nolan is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Nolan is rated at 1262 — 190 points above Motta's 1072. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Nolan has won 3 straight.

A few statistical edges stand out. Motta throws significantly more leather — a 2.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Nolan is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Nolan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Tom Nolan over Nikolas Motta.** We're leaning Nolan here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

76%
Joshua Van
Van
8-1
Elo 1678
Striker
VS
Bunes
1-1
Elo 996

The Flyweight matchup features Joshua Van (8-1) taking on Felipe Bunes (1-1). Bunes is the bigger frame at 5'7" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Van is rated at 1678 — 682 points above Bunes's 996. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Van rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Van throws significantly more leather — a 9.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Van is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Bunes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Joshua Van over Felipe Bunes.** The model is firm on this one: Van at 76%.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.