UFC Fight Night: Santos vs. Ankalaev: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, March 12, 2022·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

UFC Fight Night: Santos vs. Ankalaev lands on Saturday, March 12, 2022 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 14 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Magomed Ankalaev vs Thiago SantosLight HeavyweightMagomed AnkalaevStrong93%
Song Yadong vs Marlon MoraesBantamweightSong YadongConfident70%
Sodiq Yusuff vs Alex CaceresFeatherweightSodiq YusuffConfident72%
Khalil Rountree Jr. vs Karl RobersonLight HeavyweightKarl RobersonToss-up52%
Drew Dober vs Terrance McKinneyLightweightTerrance McKinneyStrong79%
Alex Pereira vs Bruno SilvaMiddleweightAlex PereiraConfident72%
Matthew Semelsberger vs AJ FletcherWelterweightMatthew SemelsbergerConfident73%
JJ Aldrich vs Gillian RobertsonWomen's FlyweightJJ AldrichToss-up51%
Javid Basharat vs Trevin JonesBantamweightJavid BasharatToss-up55%
Damon Jackson vs Kamuela KirkFeatherweightKamuela KirkLean64%
Miranda Maverick vs Sabina MazoWomen's FlyweightMiranda MaverickStrong82%
Cody Brundage vs Dalcha LungiambulaMiddleweightCody BrundageLean61%
Guido Cannetti vs Kris MoutinhoBantamweightGuido CannettiToss-up52%
Azamat Murzakanov vs Tafon NchukwiLight HeavyweightTafon NchukwiToss-up53%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Magomed Ankalaev vs Thiago Santos

Light HeavyweightTitle Fight
93%
Magomed Ankalaev
Ankalaev
12-1-1
Elo 1772
Striker
VS
Santos
14-9
Elo 1292
Striker

The Light Heavyweight championship matchup features Magomed Ankalaev (12-1-1) taking on Thiago Santos (14-9).

Ankalaev is rated at 1772 — 480 points above Santos's 1292. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Ankalaev rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ankalaev throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Ankalaev is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Ankalaev has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Magomed Ankalaev over Thiago Santos.** The model is firm on this one: Ankalaev at 93%. Notably, the betting market has Ankalaev at 84% implied while our model sees 93% — a 8-point disagreement that could signal value.

Song Yadong vs Marlon Moraes

Bantamweight
70%
Song Yadong
Yadong
11-3-1
Elo 1548
All-Rounder
VS
Moraes
5-5
Elo 1155
All-Rounder

The Bantamweight matchup features Song Yadong (11-3-1) taking on Marlon Moraes (5-5).

Yadong is rated at 1548 — 393 points above Moraes's 1155. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Yadong throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Moraes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Yadong has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Song Yadong over Marlon Moraes.** We're leaning Yadong here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Sodiq Yusuff vs Alex Caceres

Featherweight
72%
Sodiq Yusuff
Yusuff
6-3
Elo 1113
All-Rounder
VS
Caceres
16-12
Elo 1232
All-Rounder

The Featherweight matchup features Sodiq Yusuff (6-3) taking on Alex Caceres (16-12).

There's a real Elo separation here: Caceres at 1232 versus Yusuff at 1113. That 119-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Yusuff's all-rounder game against Caceres's knockout artist approach. Yusuff is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Caceres is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Caceres throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Caceres is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Caceres has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Sodiq Yusuff over Alex Caceres.** We're leaning Yusuff here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

52%
Karl Roberson
Jr.
10-6
Elo 1506
Striker
VS
Roberson
4-5
Elo 817
All-Rounder

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Khalil Rountree Jr. (10-6) taking on Karl Roberson (4-5).

Jr. is rated at 1506 — 689 points above Roberson's 817. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Jr.'s striker game against Roberson's all-rounder approach. Jr. brings a versatile approach, while Roberson is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jr. throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Roberson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Jr. has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Karl Roberson over Khalil Rountree Jr..** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Roberson at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

79%
Terrance McKinney
Dober
13-11
Elo 1083
All-Rounder
VS
McKinney
7-4
Elo 1110
Submission Artist

The Lightweight matchup features Drew Dober (13-11) taking on Terrance McKinney (7-4). McKinney is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Dober at 1083, McKinney at 1110. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

The style clash matters here: Dober is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while McKinney is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, submission artists own a 56% win rate against all-rounders, giving McKinney the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dober throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Dober is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Dober has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Terrance McKinney over Drew Dober.** The model is firm on this one: McKinney at 79%. The market implies 59% for Dober, but our model sees only 21%. That 37-point gap favoring McKinney is worth watching.

Alex Pereira vs Bruno Silva

Middleweight
72%
Alex Pereira
Pereira
9-2
Elo 2004
All-Rounder
VS
Silva
4-6
Elo 798
Striker

The Middleweight matchup features Alex Pereira (9-2) taking on Bruno Silva (4-6). Pereira is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Pereira is rated at 2004 — 1206 points above Silva's 798. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Pereira's all-rounder game against Silva's striker approach. Pereira is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Silva brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Silva throws significantly more leather — a 3.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Silva is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Pereira has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Alex Pereira over Bruno Silva.** We're leaning Pereira here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Pereira at 65% implied while our model sees 72% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.

73%
Matthew Semelsberger
Semelsberger
5-5
Elo 861
Knockout Artist
VS
Fletcher
1-2
Elo 967

The Welterweight matchup features Matthew Semelsberger (5-5) taking on AJ Fletcher (1-2). Semelsberger is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 8-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Fletcher at 967 versus Semelsberger at 861. That 106-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Semelsberger throws significantly more leather — a 6.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Semelsberger is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Fletcher has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Matthew Semelsberger over AJ Fletcher.** We're leaning Semelsberger here at 73%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

JJ Aldrich vs Gillian Robertson

Women's Flyweight
51%
JJ Aldrich
Aldrich
9-6
Elo 1079
Striker
VS
Robertson
12-6
Elo 1352
Wrestler

The Women's Flyweight matchup features JJ Aldrich (9-6) taking on Gillian Robertson (12-6). Aldrich will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Robertson is rated at 1352 — 273 points above Aldrich's 1079. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Robertson has won 3 straight.

Stylistically this is Aldrich's striker game against Robertson's wrestler approach. Aldrich brings a versatile approach, while Robertson looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Aldrich throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Robertson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Aldrich has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: JJ Aldrich over Gillian Robertson.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Aldrich at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

55%
Javid Basharat
Basharat
3-2
Elo 1101
Striker
VS
Jones
1-3
Elo 859

The Bantamweight matchup features Javid Basharat (3-2) taking on Trevin Jones (1-3).

Basharat is rated at 1101 — 242 points above Jones's 859. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jones throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Jones is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Basharat has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Javid Basharat over Trevin Jones.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Basharat at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 62% for Basharat, but our model sees only 55%. That 7-point gap favoring Jones is worth watching.

Damon Jackson vs Kamuela Kirk

Featherweight
64%
Kamuela Kirk
Jackson
6-5-1
Elo 1039
Wrestler
VS
Kirk
1-1
Elo 888

The Featherweight matchup features Damon Jackson (6-5-1) taking on Kamuela Kirk (1-1). Kirk will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Jackson is rated at 1039 — 151 points above Kirk's 888. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jackson throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Jackson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.8 more per 15 minutes. Kirk has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Kamuela Kirk over Damon Jackson.** The model gives Kirk a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 54% for Jackson, but our model sees only 36%. That 18-point gap favoring Kirk is worth watching.

Miranda Maverick vs Sabina Mazo

Women's Flyweight
82%
Miranda Maverick
Maverick
8-3
Elo 1264
Wrestler
VS
Mazo
3-3
Elo 804
All-Rounder

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Miranda Maverick (8-3) taking on Sabina Mazo (3-3). Mazo is the bigger frame at 5'7" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Maverick is rated at 1264 — 460 points above Mazo's 804. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Maverick rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Maverick looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Mazo is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Maverick the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mazo throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Maverick is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Maverick has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Miranda Maverick over Sabina Mazo.** The model is firm on this one: Maverick at 82%. Notably, the betting market has Maverick at 76% implied while our model sees 82% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.

61%
Cody Brundage
Brundage
5-6
Elo 870
All-Rounder
VS
Lungiambula
2-4
Elo 739
Striker

The Middleweight matchup features Cody Brundage (5-6) taking on Dalcha Lungiambula (2-4). Lungiambula will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Brundage at 870 versus Lungiambula at 739. That 131-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Brundage's all-rounder game against Lungiambula's striker approach. Brundage is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Lungiambula brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lungiambula throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Lungiambula is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Brundage has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Cody Brundage over Dalcha Lungiambula.** The model gives Brundage a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Brundage at 44% implied while our model sees 61% — a 18-point disagreement that could signal value.

52%
Guido Cannetti
Cannetti
4-5
Elo 1005
All-Rounder
VS
Moutinho
0-2
Elo 743

The Bantamweight matchup features Guido Cannetti (4-5) taking on Kris Moutinho (0-2).

Cannetti is rated at 1005 — 262 points above Moutinho's 743. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Moutinho throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Cannetti is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Cannetti has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Guido Cannetti over Kris Moutinho.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Cannetti at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Cannetti at 41% implied while our model sees 52% — a 11-point disagreement that could signal value.

Azamat Murzakanov vs Tafon Nchukwi

Light Heavyweight
53%
Tafon Nchukwi
Murzakanov
5-0
Elo 1573
Striker
VS
Nchukwi
2-3
Elo 716
Striker

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Azamat Murzakanov (5-0) taking on Tafon Nchukwi (2-3). Nchukwi is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Murzakanov is rated at 1573 — 857 points above Nchukwi's 716. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Murzakanov rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nchukwi throws significantly more leather — a 6.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Nchukwi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Murzakanov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Tafon Nchukwi over Azamat Murzakanov.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Nchukwi at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market implies 65% for Murzakanov, but our model sees only 47%. That 18-point gap favoring Nchukwi is worth watching.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.