UFC 260: Miocic vs. Ngannou: Predictions & Analysis
UFC 260: Miocic vs. Ngannou lands on Saturday, March 27, 2021 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 10 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.
Quick Picks
| Matchup | Pick | Confidence | Prob |
|---|---|---|---|
| Francis Ngannou vs Stipe MiocicHeavyweight | Francis Ngannou | Toss-up | 51% |
| Vicente Luque vs Tyron WoodleyWelterweight | Vicente Luque | Confident | 74% |
| Sean O'Malley vs Thomas AlmeidaBantamweight | Sean O'Malley | Confident | 69% |
| Miranda Maverick vs Gillian RobertsonWomen's Flyweight | Miranda Maverick | Lean | 60% |
| Jamie Mullarkey vs Khama WorthyLightweight | Khama Worthy | Toss-up | 50% |
| Alonzo Menifield vs Fabio CherantLight Heavyweight | Fabio Cherant | Lean | 55% |
| Abubakar Nurmagomedov vs Jared GoodenWelterweight | Abubakar Nurmagomedov | Lean | 61% |
| Michal Oleksiejczuk vs Modestas BukauskasLight Heavyweight | Michal Oleksiejczuk | Toss-up | 55% |
| Omar Morales vs Shane YoungFeatherweight | Omar Morales | Lean | 60% |
| Marc-Andre Barriault vs Abu AzaitarMiddleweight | Abu Azaitar | Toss-up | 52% |
Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings
Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook
Bet Now on DraftKingsFight-by-Fight Breakdown
Francis Ngannou vs Stipe Miocic
The Heavyweight matchup features Francis Ngannou (12-2) taking on Stipe Miocic (14-5). Ngannou will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.
Ngannou is rated at 2193 — 219 points above Miocic's 1974. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Ngannou rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.
The style clash matters here: Ngannou is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Miocic brings a versatile approach. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Ngannou the stylistic edge.
A few statistical edges stand out. Miocic throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Miocic is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Ngannou has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Francis Ngannou over Stipe Miocic. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Ngannou at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Vicente Luque vs Tyron Woodley
The Welterweight matchup features Vicente Luque (16-8) taking on Tyron Woodley (9-6-1).
Woodley is rated at 1642 — 228 points above Luque's 1414. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.
A few statistical edges stand out. Luque throws significantly more leather — a 4.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Woodley is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Luque has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Vicente Luque over Tyron Woodley. We're leaning Luque here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.
Sean O'Malley vs Thomas Almeida
The Bantamweight matchup features Sean O'Malley (11-3) taking on Thomas Almeida (5-5). O'Malley is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 2-inch reach advantage.
O'Malley is rated at 1828 — 791 points above Almeida's 1037. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
The style clash matters here: O'Malley is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Almeida brings a versatile approach. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving O'Malley the stylistic edge.
A few statistical edges stand out. O'Malley throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. O'Malley is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. O'Malley has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Sean O'Malley over Thomas Almeida. We're leaning O'Malley here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.
Miranda Maverick vs Gillian Robertson
The Women's Flyweight matchup features Miranda Maverick (8-4) taking on Gillian Robertson (14-6).
There's a real Elo separation here: Robertson at 1422 versus Maverick at 1318. That 103-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results. Both fighters bring momentum: Maverick rides a 4-fight win streak into this one, while Robertson has won 4 straight.
Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.
A few statistical edges stand out. Maverick throws significantly more leather — a 7.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Robertson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Maverick has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Miranda Maverick over Gillian Robertson. The model gives Maverick a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.
Jamie Mullarkey vs Khama Worthy
The Lightweight matchup features Jamie Mullarkey (6-7) taking on Khama Worthy (2-3).
Mullarkey is rated at 961 — 235 points above Worthy's 726. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Worthy throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Mullarkey is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.0 more per 15 minutes. Worthy has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Khama Worthy over Jamie Mullarkey. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Worthy at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Alonzo Menifield vs Fabio Cherant
The Light Heavyweight matchup features Alonzo Menifield (10-6-1) taking on Fabio Cherant (0-3).
Menifield is rated at 1314 — 659 points above Cherant's 654. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Menifield throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Cherant is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Cherant has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Fabio Cherant over Alonzo Menifield. The model gives Cherant a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.
Abubakar Nurmagomedov vs Jared Gooden
The Welterweight matchup features Abubakar Nurmagomedov (2-2) taking on Jared Gooden (2-5). Gooden will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.
Nurmagomedov carries a modest Elo edge (1035 to 993), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.
A few statistical edges stand out. Gooden throws significantly more leather — a 5.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Nurmagomedov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.3 more per 15 minutes. Nurmagomedov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Abubakar Nurmagomedov over Jared Gooden. The model gives Nurmagomedov a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.
Michal Oleksiejczuk vs Modestas Bukauskas
The Light Heavyweight matchup features Michal Oleksiejczuk (10-7) taking on Modestas Bukauskas (7-5). Bukauskas is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 2-inch reach advantage.
The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Oleksiejczuk at 1312, Bukauskas at 1288. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets. Bukauskas has won 4 straight.
The style clash matters here: Oleksiejczuk brings a versatile approach, while Bukauskas is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Bukauskas the stylistic edge.
A few statistical edges stand out. Oleksiejczuk throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Oleksiejczuk is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Oleksiejczuk has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Michal Oleksiejczuk over Modestas Bukauskas. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Oleksiejczuk at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Omar Morales vs Shane Young
The Featherweight matchup features Omar Morales (3-4) taking on Shane Young (2-5). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Morales.
There's a real Elo separation here: Morales at 860 versus Young at 710. That 150-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.
Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.
A few statistical edges stand out. Young throws significantly more leather — a 3.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Young is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Morales has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Omar Morales over Shane Young. The model gives Morales a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.
Marc-Andre Barriault vs Abu Azaitar
The Middleweight matchup features Marc-Andre Barriault (6-10) taking on Abu Azaitar (1-2). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Barriault.
Barriault is rated at 1051 — 335 points above Azaitar's 716. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Barriault throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Azaitar is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Barriault has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Abu Azaitar over Marc-Andre Barriault. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Azaitar at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.
Methodology
Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.
On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.