UFC Fight Night: Hill vs. Rountree Jr.: Predictions & Analysis
UFC Fight Night: Hill vs. Rountree Jr. lands on Saturday, June 21, 2025 in Baku, Azerbaijan with 12 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.
Quick Picks
| Matchup | Pick | Confidence | Prob |
|---|---|---|---|
| Khalil Rountree Jr. vs Jamahal HillLight Heavyweight | Jamahal Hill | Lean | 61% |
| Rafael Fiziev vs Ignacio BahamondesLightweight | Ignacio Bahamondes | Confident | 67% |
| Curtis Blaydes vs Rizvan KunievHeavyweight | Curtis Blaydes | Confident | 68% |
| Myktybek Orolbai vs Tofiq MusayevCatch Weight | Myktybek Orolbai | Confident | 74% |
| Nazim Sadykhov vs Nikolas MottaLightweight | Nazim Sadykhov | Strong | 88% |
| Muhammad Naimov vs Bogdan GradFeatherweight | Muhammad Naimov | Confident | 68% |
| Seokhyeon Ko vs Oban ElliottWelterweight | Oban Elliott | Strong | 82% |
| JunYong Park vs Ismail NaurdievMiddleweight | Ismail Naurdiev | Lean | 60% |
| Daria Zhelezniakova vs Melissa MullinsWomen's Bantamweight | Melissa Mullins | Lean | 63% |
| Klaudia Sygula vs Irina AlekseevaWomen's Bantamweight | Irina Alekseeva | Lean | 65% |
| Tagir Ulanbekov vs Azat MaksumFlyweight | Tagir Ulanbekov | Strong | 83% |
| Mohammed Usman vs Hamdy AbdelwahabHeavyweight | Hamdy Abdelwahab | Lean | 55% |
Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings
Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook
Bet Now on DraftKingsFight-by-Fight Breakdown
Khalil Rountree Jr. vs Jamahal Hill
The Light Heavyweight championship matchup features Khalil Rountree Jr. (10-7) taking on Jamahal Hill (6-4). Hill is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 3-inch reach advantage.
Jr. carries a modest Elo edge (1559 to 1504), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.
Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.
A few statistical edges stand out. Hill throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Hill is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Jr. has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Jamahal Hill over Khalil Rountree Jr.. The model gives Hill a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.
Rafael Fiziev vs Ignacio Bahamondes
The Lightweight matchup features Rafael Fiziev (7-5) taking on Ignacio Bahamondes (6-4). Bahamondes is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 4-inch reach advantage.
Fiziev is rated at 1488 — 150 points above Bahamondes's 1338. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
Stylistically this is Fiziev's striker game against Bahamondes's all-rounder approach. Fiziev brings a versatile approach, while Bahamondes is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.
A few statistical edges stand out. Bahamondes throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Fiziev is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Bahamondes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Ignacio Bahamondes over Rafael Fiziev. We're leaning Bahamondes here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market implies 44% for Fiziev, but our model sees only 33%. That 11-point gap favoring Bahamondes is worth watching.
Curtis Blaydes vs Rizvan Kuniev
The Heavyweight matchup features Curtis Blaydes (14-5) taking on Rizvan Kuniev (1-1). Blaydes will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.
Blaydes is rated at 1794 — 546 points above Kuniev's 1249. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Blaydes throws significantly more leather — a 4.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Kuniev is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Kuniev has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Curtis Blaydes over Rizvan Kuniev. We're leaning Blaydes here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.
Myktybek Orolbai vs Tofiq Musayev
The Catch Weight matchup features Myktybek Orolbai (5-1) taking on Tofiq Musayev (1-1). Orolbai will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.
Orolbai is rated at 1544 — 351 points above Musayev's 1192. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Orolbai throws significantly more leather — a 3.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Orolbai is far more active with takedowns, averaging 5.4 more per 15 minutes. Musayev has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Myktybek Orolbai over Tofiq Musayev. We're leaning Orolbai here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Orolbai at 61% implied while our model sees 74% — a 13-point disagreement that could signal value.
Nazim Sadykhov vs Nikolas Motta
The Lightweight matchup features Nazim Sadykhov (4-1-1) taking on Nikolas Motta (3-3).
Sadykhov is rated at 1388 — 234 points above Motta's 1154. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
Stylistically this is Sadykhov's all-rounder game against Motta's striker approach. Sadykhov is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Motta brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.
A few statistical edges stand out. Sadykhov throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Sadykhov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Motta has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Nazim Sadykhov over Nikolas Motta. The model is firm on this one: Sadykhov at 88%. Notably, the betting market has Sadykhov at 78% implied while our model sees 88% — a 10-point disagreement that could signal value.
Muhammad Naimov vs Bogdan Grad
The Featherweight matchup features Muhammad Naimov (5-2) taking on Bogdan Grad (1-2).
Naimov is rated at 1165 — 363 points above Grad's 802. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Grad throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Grad is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.4 more per 15 minutes. Naimov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Muhammad Naimov over Bogdan Grad. We're leaning Naimov here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.
Seokhyeon Ko vs Oban Elliott
The Welterweight matchup features Seokhyeon Ko (2-0) taking on Oban Elliott (3-2).
Ko is rated at 1401 — 371 points above Elliott's 1030. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Elliott throws significantly more leather — a 4.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Elliott is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Ko has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Oban Elliott over Seokhyeon Ko. The model is firm on this one: Elliott at 82%. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.
JunYong Park vs Ismail Naurdiev
The Middleweight matchup features JunYong Park (9-4) taking on Ismail Naurdiev (4-3).
There's a real Elo separation here: Park at 1324 versus Naurdiev at 1226. That 98-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.
The style clash matters here: Park looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Naurdiev is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Park the stylistic edge.
A few statistical edges stand out. Park throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Naurdiev is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Naurdiev has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Ismail Naurdiev over JunYong Park. The model gives Naurdiev a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.
Daria Zhelezniakova vs Melissa Mullins
The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Daria Zhelezniakova (2-1) taking on Melissa Mullins (2-2).
Zhelezniakova is rated at 1192 — 195 points above Mullins's 997. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Mullins throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Mullins is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Zhelezniakova has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Melissa Mullins over Daria Zhelezniakova. The model gives Mullins a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Zhelezniakova at 31% implied while our model sees 37% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.
Klaudia Sygula vs Irina Alekseeva
The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Klaudia Sygula (2-1) taking on Irina Alekseeva (1-3).
Sygula is rated at 1142 — 407 points above Alekseeva's 736. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Alekseeva throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Alekseeva is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Alekseeva has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Irina Alekseeva over Klaudia Sygula. The model gives Alekseeva a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Sygula at 30% implied while our model sees 35% — a 5-point disagreement that could signal value.
Tagir Ulanbekov vs Azat Maksum
The Flyweight matchup features Tagir Ulanbekov (6-2) taking on Azat Maksum (1-3).
Ulanbekov is rated at 1316 — 562 points above Maksum's 755. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Ulanbekov rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.
A few statistical edges stand out. Ulanbekov throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Ulanbekov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Maksum has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Tagir Ulanbekov over Azat Maksum. The model is firm on this one: Ulanbekov at 83%. Notably, the betting market has Ulanbekov at 79% implied while our model sees 83% — a 4-point disagreement that could signal value.
Mohammed Usman vs Hamdy Abdelwahab
The Heavyweight matchup features Mohammed Usman (4-2) taking on Hamdy Abdelwahab (2-1). Usman will look to use a 7-inch reach edge to control distance.
The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Usman at 1113, Abdelwahab at 1112. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.
A few statistical edges stand out. Usman throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Abdelwahab is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Abdelwahab has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Hamdy Abdelwahab over Mohammed Usman. The model gives Abdelwahab a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Usman at 40% implied while our model sees 45% — a 5-point disagreement that could signal value.
Methodology
Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.
On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.