UFC 227: Dillashaw vs. Garbrandt 2: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, August 4, 2018·Los Angeles, California, USA
Published April 16, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 227: Dillashaw vs. Garbrandt 2 lands on Saturday, August 4, 2018 in Los Angeles, California, USA with 12 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
TJ Dillashaw vs Cody GarbrandtBantamweightTJ DillashawLean64%
Henry Cejudo vs Demetrious JohnsonFlyweightDemetrious JohnsonStrong81%
Renato Moicano vs Cub SwansonFeatherweightRenato MoicanoStrong81%
JJ Aldrich vs Polyana VianaWomen's StrawweightJJ AldrichLean56%
Thiago Santos vs Kevin HollandMiddleweightThiago SantosStrong76%
Pedro Munhoz vs Brett JohnsBantamweightPedro MunhozConfident69%
Ricky Simon vs Montel JacksonBantamweightMontel JacksonToss-up53%
Ricardo Ramos vs Kyung Ho KangBantamweightRicardo RamosConfident72%
Sheymon Moraes vs Matt SaylesFeatherweightMatt SaylesToss-up52%
Alex Perez vs Jose TorresFlyweightAlex PerezConfident66%
Zhang Weili vs Danielle TaylorWomen's StrawweightDanielle TaylorLean56%
Marlon Vera vs WulijiburenBantamweightMarlon VeraLean56%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

64%
TJ Dillashaw
Dillashaw
13-5
CH-III1691
All-Rounder
VS
Garbrandt
10-7
CO-III1313
Striker
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Bantamweight matchup features TJ Dillashaw (13-5) taking on Cody Garbrandt (10-7).

Dillashaw is rated at 1691 — 378 points above Garbrandt's 1313. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Dillashaw's all-rounder game against Garbrandt's striker approach. Dillashaw is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Garbrandt brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dillashaw throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Dillashaw is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Garbrandt has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: TJ Dillashaw over Cody Garbrandt. The model gives Dillashaw a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

Henry Cejudo vs Demetrious Johnson

FlyweightTitle Fight
81%
Demetrious Johnson
Cejudo
10-6
CH-III1629
All-Rounder
VS
Johnson
15-2-1
CH-III1671
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 67%
Under 33%Over 67%

The Flyweight championship matchup features Henry Cejudo (10-6) taking on Demetrious Johnson (15-2-1).

Johnson carries a modest Elo edge (1671 to 1629), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm. Johnson has won 13 straight.

Stylistically this is Cejudo's striker game against Johnson's wrestler approach. Cejudo brings a versatile approach, while Johnson looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cejudo throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Johnson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Johnson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Demetrious Johnson over Henry Cejudo. The model is firm on this one: Johnson at 81%. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Renato Moicano vs Cub Swanson

Featherweight
81%
Renato Moicano
Moicano
13-7
CH-III1641
Wrestler
VS
Swanson
15-10
CO-III1323
Striker
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Featherweight matchup features Renato Moicano (13-7) taking on Cub Swanson (15-10). Moicano is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Moicano is rated at 1641 — 318 points above Swanson's 1323. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Swanson throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Moicano is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Moicano has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Renato Moicano over Cub Swanson. The model is firm on this one: Moicano at 81%. Notably, the betting market has Moicano at 73% implied while our model sees 81% — a 7-point disagreement that could signal value.

JJ Aldrich vs Polyana Viana

Women's Strawweight
56%
JJ Aldrich
Aldrich
10-6
RK-II1113
Striker
VS
Viana
4-7
PR-I867
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Women's Strawweight matchup features JJ Aldrich (10-6) taking on Polyana Viana (4-7).

Aldrich is rated at 1113 — 245 points above Viana's 867. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Aldrich's striker game against Viana's wrestler approach. Aldrich brings a versatile approach, while Viana looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Aldrich throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Viana is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.6 more per 15 minutes. Aldrich has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: JJ Aldrich over Polyana Viana. The model gives Aldrich a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

76%
Thiago Santos
Santos
14-10
CO-II1426
Striker
VS
Holland
15-12
CO-II1375
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 57%
Under 57%Over 43%

The Middleweight matchup features Thiago Santos (14-10) taking on Kevin Holland (15-12). Holland will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

Santos carries a modest Elo edge (1426 to 1375), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Santos's striker game against Holland's all-rounder approach. Santos brings a versatile approach, while Holland is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Santos throws significantly more leather — a 6.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Santos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Holland has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Thiago Santos over Kevin Holland. The model is firm on this one: Santos at 76%. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Pedro Munhoz vs Brett Johns

Bantamweight
69%
Pedro Munhoz
Munhoz
10-10
CO-II1369
All-Rounder
VS
Johns
5-2
CO-II1350
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 62%
Under 38%Over 62%

The Bantamweight matchup features Pedro Munhoz (10-10) taking on Brett Johns (5-2). Johns will look to use a 6-inch reach edge to control distance.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Munhoz at 1369, Johns at 1350. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Munhoz throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Johns is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.2 more per 15 minutes. Munhoz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Pedro Munhoz over Brett Johns. We're leaning Munhoz here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

53%
Montel Jackson
Simon
10-6-1
CO-III1297
All-Rounder
VS
Jackson
9-3
CO-I1538
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Bantamweight matchup features Ricky Simon (10-6-1) taking on Montel Jackson (9-3). Jackson is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Jackson is rated at 1538 — 240 points above Simon's 1297. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Jackson has won 6 straight.

Stylistically this is Simon's all-rounder game against Jackson's knockout artist approach. Simon is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Jackson is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Simon throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Simon is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Jackson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Montel Jackson over Ricky Simon. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Jackson at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

72%
Ricardo Ramos
Ramos
8-7
MC-III908
All-Rounder
VS
Kang
8-5
RK-I1142
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Bantamweight matchup features Ricardo Ramos (8-7) taking on Kyung Ho Kang (8-5).

Kang is rated at 1142 — 234 points above Ramos's 908. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ramos throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Kang is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Ramos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ricardo Ramos over Kyung Ho Kang. We're leaning Ramos here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Sheymon Moraes vs Matt Sayles

Featherweight
52%
Matt Sayles
Moraes
2-3
RK-III1014
VS
Sayles
1-3
PR-II852
Over/UnderOver 60%
Under 40%Over 60%

The Featherweight matchup features Sheymon Moraes (2-3) taking on Matt Sayles (1-3). Moraes will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Moraes is rated at 1014 — 162 points above Sayles's 852. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Moraes throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Sayles is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Sayles has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Matt Sayles over Sheymon Moraes. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Sayles at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

66%
Alex Perez
Perez
8-6
CO-III1332
All-Rounder
VS
Torres
1-1
RK-III1005
Over/UnderOver 60%
Under 40%Over 60%

The Flyweight matchup features Alex Perez (8-6) taking on Jose Torres (1-1).

Perez is rated at 1332 — 327 points above Torres's 1005. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Torres throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Perez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.9 more per 15 minutes. Perez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alex Perez over Jose Torres. We're leaning Perez here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Perez at 56% implied while our model sees 66% — a 10-point disagreement that could signal value.

Zhang Weili vs Danielle Taylor

Women's Strawweight
56%
Danielle Taylor
Weili
10-3
CH-II1741
Wrestler
VS
Taylor
2-3
PR-I871
Over/UnderOver 65%
Under 35%Over 65%

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Zhang Weili (10-3) taking on Danielle Taylor (2-3). Weili is the bigger frame at 5'4" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Weili is rated at 1741 — 870 points above Taylor's 871. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Weili rides a 5-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Taylor throws significantly more leather — a 2.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Taylor is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Weili has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Danielle Taylor over Zhang Weili. The model gives Taylor a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

Marlon Vera vs Wulijiburen

Bantamweight
56%
Marlon Vera
Vera
15-11
CO-I1489
All-Rounder
VS
Wulijiburen
0-3
UC-II669
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Bantamweight matchup features Marlon Vera (15-11) taking on Wulijiburen (0-3).

Vera is rated at 1489 — 820 points above Wulijiburen's 669. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Vera throws significantly more leather — a 2.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Wulijiburen is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.8 more per 15 minutes. Wulijiburen has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Marlon Vera over Wulijiburen. The model gives Vera a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.