UFC 315: Muhammad vs. Della Maddalena: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, May 10, 2025·Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Published April 18, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 315: Muhammad vs. Della Maddalena lands on Saturday, May 10, 2025 in Montreal, Quebec, Canada with 12 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by 2 title bouts. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Jack Della Maddalena vs Belal MuhammadWelterweightBelal MuhammadLean57%
Valentina Shevchenko vs Manon FiorotWomen's FlyweightValentina ShevchenkoLean56%
Aiemann Zahabi vs Jose AldoFeatherweightAiemann ZahabiToss-up51%
Natalia Silva vs Alexa GrassoWomen's FlyweightNatalia SilvaConfident74%
Benoit Saint Denis vs Kyle PrepolecLightweightBenoit Saint DenisStrong85%
Mike Malott vs Charles RadtkeWelterweightMike MalottConfident68%
Jasmine Jasudavicius vs Jessica AndradeWomen's FlyweightJasmine JasudaviciusStrong86%
Modestas Bukauskas vs Ion CutelabaLight HeavyweightIon CutelabaLean62%
Navajo Stirling vs Ivan ErslanLight HeavyweightNavajo StirlingStrong82%
Marc-Andre Barriault vs Bruno SilvaMiddleweightMarc-Andre BarriaultLean58%
Daniel Santos vs JeongYeong LeeFeatherweightJeongYeong LeeToss-up53%
Bekzat Almakhan vs Brad KatonaBantamweightBrad KatonaConfident67%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Jack Della Maddalena vs Belal Muhammad

WelterweightTitle Fight
57%
Belal Muhammad
Maddalena
8-1
CH-I1939
All-Rounder
VS
Muhammad
15-5
CH-I1817
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 65%
Under 35%Over 65%

The Welterweight championship matchup features Jack Della Maddalena (8-1) taking on Belal Muhammad (15-5).

There's a real Elo separation here: Maddalena at 1939 versus Muhammad at 1817. That 122-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Maddalena's knockout artist game against Muhammad's wrestler approach. Maddalena is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Muhammad looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Maddalena throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Muhammad is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.9 more per 15 minutes. Maddalena has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Belal Muhammad over Jack Della Maddalena. The model gives Muhammad a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Maddalena at 36% implied while our model sees 43% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.

Valentina Shevchenko vs Manon Fiorot

Women's FlyweightTitle Fight
56%
Valentina Shevchenko
Shevchenko
15-3-1
CH-I1807
All-Rounder
VS
Fiorot
8-1
CH-II1718
Striker
Over/UnderOver 74%
Under 26%Over 74%

The Women's Flyweight championship matchup features Valentina Shevchenko (15-3-1) taking on Manon Fiorot (8-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Shevchenko at 1807 versus Fiorot at 1718. That 89-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Shevchenko's all-rounder game against Fiorot's striker approach. Shevchenko is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Fiorot brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fiorot throws significantly more leather — a 2.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Shevchenko is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Fiorot has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Valentina Shevchenko over Manon Fiorot. The model gives Shevchenko a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Shevchenko at 45% implied while our model sees 56% — a 11-point disagreement that could signal value.

Aiemann Zahabi vs Jose Aldo

Featherweight
51%
Aiemann Zahabi
Zahabi
8-2
CH-III1673
Striker
VS
Aldo
14-9
CO-I1541
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Featherweight matchup features Aiemann Zahabi (8-2) taking on Jose Aldo (14-9).

There's a real Elo separation here: Zahabi at 1673 versus Aldo at 1541. That 132-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results. Zahabi rides a 7-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Zahabi's striker game against Aldo's all-rounder approach. Zahabi brings a versatile approach, while Aldo is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Zahabi throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Aldo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Zahabi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Aiemann Zahabi over Jose Aldo. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Zahabi at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Zahabi at 38% implied while our model sees 51% — a 13-point disagreement that could signal value.

Natalia Silva vs Alexa Grasso

Women's Flyweight
74%
Natalia Silva
Silva
8-0
CH-II1703
Striker
VS
Grasso
9-5-1
CH-III1602
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Natalia Silva (8-0) taking on Alexa Grasso (9-5-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Silva at 1703 versus Grasso at 1602. That 101-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results. Silva rides a 7-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Silva's striker game against Grasso's all-rounder approach. Silva brings a versatile approach, while Grasso is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Silva throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Grasso is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Silva has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Natalia Silva over Alexa Grasso. We're leaning Silva here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Silva at 68% implied while our model sees 74% — a 6-point disagreement that could signal value.

85%
Benoit Saint Denis
Denis
9-3
CH-II1798
Submission Artist
VS
Prepolec
0-4
UC-I763
Over/UnderOver 50%
Under 50%Over 50%

The Lightweight matchup features Benoit Saint Denis (9-3) taking on Kyle Prepolec (0-4). Denis will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Denis is rated at 1798 — 1035 points above Prepolec's 763. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Denis rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Denis throws significantly more leather — a 2.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Denis is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.5 more per 15 minutes. Prepolec has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Benoit Saint Denis over Kyle Prepolec. The model is firm on this one: Denis at 85%. The market implies 90% for Denis, but our model sees only 85%. That 4-point gap favoring Prepolec is worth watching.

68%
Mike Malott
Malott
6-1
CO-I1498
All-Rounder
VS
Radtke
4-2
RK-I1142
Striker
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Welterweight matchup features Mike Malott (6-1) taking on Charles Radtke (4-2). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Malott.

Malott is rated at 1498 — 356 points above Radtke's 1142. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Malott rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Malott's all-rounder game against Radtke's striker approach. Malott is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Radtke brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Malott throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Malott is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.8 more per 15 minutes. Radtke has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mike Malott over Charles Radtke. We're leaning Malott here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Malott at 65% implied while our model sees 68% — a 3-point disagreement that could signal value.

86%
Jasmine Jasudavicius
Jasudavicius
8-3
CO-II1427
Wrestler
VS
Andrade
17-13
CO-III1240
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Jasmine Jasudavicius (8-3) taking on Jessica Andrade (17-13). Jasudavicius is the bigger frame at 5'7" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Jasudavicius is rated at 1427 — 188 points above Andrade's 1240. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Jasudavicius's wrestler game against Andrade's knockout artist approach. Jasudavicius looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Andrade is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Andrade throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Jasudavicius is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Andrade has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jasmine Jasudavicius over Jessica Andrade. The model is firm on this one: Jasudavicius at 86%. Notably, the betting market has Jasudavicius at 71% implied while our model sees 86% — a 15-point disagreement that could signal value.

Modestas Bukauskas vs Ion Cutelaba

Light Heavyweight
62%
Ion Cutelaba
Bukauskas
7-5
CO-III1288
Knockout Artist
VS
Cutelaba
9-10-1
CO-III1305
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Modestas Bukauskas (7-5) taking on Ion Cutelaba (9-10-1).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Bukauskas at 1288, Cutelaba at 1305. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets. Bukauskas rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Bukauskas's knockout artist game against Cutelaba's wrestler approach. Bukauskas is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Cutelaba looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cutelaba throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Cutelaba is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.4 more per 15 minutes. Bukauskas has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ion Cutelaba over Modestas Bukauskas. The model gives Cutelaba a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 50% for Bukauskas, but our model sees only 38%. That 12-point gap favoring Cutelaba is worth watching.

Navajo Stirling vs Ivan Erslan

Light Heavyweight
82%
Navajo Stirling
Stirling
4-0
CO-II1378
VS
Erslan
0-3
PR-III809
Over/UnderUnder 55%
Under 55%Over 45%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Navajo Stirling (4-0) taking on Ivan Erslan (0-3). Stirling is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 7-inch reach advantage.

Stirling is rated at 1378 — 570 points above Erslan's 809. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Stirling rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Stirling throws significantly more leather — a 2.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Erslan is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Stirling has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Navajo Stirling over Ivan Erslan. The model is firm on this one: Stirling at 82%. Notably, the betting market has Stirling at 74% implied while our model sees 82% — a 8-point disagreement that could signal value.

58%
Marc-Andre Barriault
Barriault
6-10
RK-III1051
All-Rounder
VS
Silva
4-7
PR-I886
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 59%
Under 59%Over 41%

The Middleweight matchup features Marc-Andre Barriault (6-10) taking on Bruno Silva (4-7).

Barriault is rated at 1051 — 165 points above Silva's 886. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Barriault's all-rounder game against Silva's striker approach. Barriault is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Silva brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Barriault throws significantly more leather — a 4.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Silva is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Barriault has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Marc-Andre Barriault over Bruno Silva. The model gives Barriault a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

53%
JeongYeong Lee
Santos
4-1
CO-II1409
VS
Lee
2-2
PR-I894
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Featherweight matchup features Daniel Santos (4-1) taking on JeongYeong Lee (2-2). Lee is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Santos is rated at 1409 — 516 points above Lee's 894. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Santos rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Santos throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Santos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Lee has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: JeongYeong Lee over Daniel Santos. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Lee at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

67%
Brad Katona
Almakhan
1-2
RK-III1021
VS
Katona
4-5
PR-II839
Striker
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Bantamweight matchup features Bekzat Almakhan (1-2) taking on Brad Katona (4-5). Almakhan will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Almakhan is rated at 1021 — 183 points above Katona's 839. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Katona throws significantly more leather — a 5.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Katona is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Katona has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brad Katona over Bekzat Almakhan. We're leaning Katona here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.