UFC 211: Miocic vs. Dos Santos: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, May 13, 2017·Dallas, Texas, USA

UFC 211: Miocic vs. Dos Santos lands on Saturday, May 13, 2017 in Dallas, Texas, USA with 12 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Stipe Miocic vs Junior Dos SantosHeavyweightStipe MiocicConfident68%
Joanna Jedrzejczyk vs Jessica AndradeWomen's StrawweightJoanna JedrzejczykLean59%
Demian Maia vs Jorge MasvidalWelterweightDemian MaiaLean65%
Frankie Edgar vs Yair RodriguezFeatherweightFrankie EdgarToss-up54%
David Branch vs Krzysztof JotkoMiddleweightKrzysztof JotkoLean60%
Eddie Alvarez vs Dustin PoirierLightweightDustin PoirierLean59%
Jason Knight vs Chas SkellyFeatherweightJason KnightConfident66%
Chase Sherman vs Rashad CoulterHeavyweightChase ShermanLean63%
James Vick vs Marco Polo ReyesLightweightJames VickStrong92%
Cortney Casey vs Jessica AguilarWomen's StrawweightCortney CaseyConfident74%
Enrique Barzola vs Gabriel BenitezFeatherweightGabriel BenitezToss-up53%
Gadzhimurad Antigulov vs Joachim ChristensenLight HeavyweightGadzhimurad AntigulovStrong81%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

68%
Stipe Miocic
Miocic
14-4
Elo 1847
Striker
VS
Santos
15-7
Elo 1191
Striker

The Heavyweight matchup features Stipe Miocic (14-4) taking on Junior Dos Santos (15-7). Miocic will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Miocic is rated at 1847 — 656 points above Santos's 1191. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Miocic's striker game against Santos's all-rounder approach. Miocic brings a versatile approach, while Santos is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Miocic throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Miocic is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.8 more per 15 minutes. Miocic has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Stipe Miocic over Junior Dos Santos.** We're leaning Miocic here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Joanna Jedrzejczyk vs Jessica Andrade

Women's StrawweightTitle Fight
59%
Joanna Jedrzejczyk
Jedrzejczyk
10-4
Elo 1192
All-Rounder
VS
Andrade
17-12
Elo 1115
Knockout Artist

The Women's Strawweight championship matchup features Joanna Jedrzejczyk (10-4) taking on Jessica Andrade (17-12). Jedrzejczyk is the bigger frame at 5'6" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Jedrzejczyk carries a modest Elo edge (1192 to 1115), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Jedrzejczyk's striker game against Andrade's all-rounder approach. Jedrzejczyk brings a versatile approach, while Andrade is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jedrzejczyk throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Andrade is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.8 more per 15 minutes. Jedrzejczyk has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Joanna Jedrzejczyk over Jessica Andrade.** The model gives Jedrzejczyk a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 64% for Jedrzejczyk, but our model sees only 59%. That 5-point gap favoring Andrade is worth watching.

65%
Demian Maia
Maia
22-10
Elo 1371
Wrestler
VS
Masvidal
12-9
Elo 1579
Knockout Artist

The Welterweight matchup features Demian Maia (22-10) taking on Jorge Masvidal (12-9).

Masvidal is rated at 1579 — 208 points above Maia's 1371. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Maia looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Masvidal is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Maia the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Masvidal throws significantly more leather — a 3.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Maia is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.4 more per 15 minutes. Maia has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Demian Maia over Jorge Masvidal.** The model gives Maia a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Maia at 47% implied while our model sees 65% — a 17-point disagreement that could signal value.

54%
Frankie Edgar
Edgar
18-10-1
Elo 1185
All-Rounder
VS
Rodriguez
10-4
Elo 1559
All-Rounder

The Featherweight matchup features Frankie Edgar (18-10-1) taking on Yair Rodriguez (10-4). Rodriguez is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Rodriguez is rated at 1559 — 374 points above Edgar's 1185. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Edgar looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Rodriguez is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Edgar the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rodriguez throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Edgar is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Rodriguez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Frankie Edgar over Yair Rodriguez.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Edgar at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

60%
Krzysztof Jotko
Branch
4-4
Elo 1136
Striker
VS
Jotko
11-5
Elo 1222
Striker

The Middleweight matchup features David Branch (4-4) taking on Krzysztof Jotko (11-5).

There's a real Elo separation here: Jotko at 1222 versus Branch at 1136. That 85-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jotko throws significantly more leather — a 2.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Branch is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Branch has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Krzysztof Jotko over David Branch.** The model gives Jotko a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

59%
Dustin Poirier
Alvarez
4-2
Elo 1398
Striker
VS
Poirier
22-8
Elo 1681
Knockout Artist

The Lightweight matchup features Eddie Alvarez (4-2) taking on Dustin Poirier (22-8). Poirier will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Poirier is rated at 1681 — 283 points above Alvarez's 1398. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Alvarez's striker game against Poirier's submission artist approach. Alvarez brings a versatile approach, while Poirier is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Poirier throws significantly more leather — a 3.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Poirier is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Alvarez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Dustin Poirier over Eddie Alvarez.** The model gives Poirier a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way. The market implies 47% for Alvarez, but our model sees only 41%. That 5-point gap favoring Poirier is worth watching.

Jason Knight vs Chas Skelly

Featherweight
66%
Jason Knight
Knight
4-4
Elo 987
Knockout Artist
VS
Skelly
7-3
Elo 1251
Wrestler

The Featherweight matchup features Jason Knight (4-4) taking on Chas Skelly (7-3).

Skelly is rated at 1251 — 264 points above Knight's 987. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Knight's knockout artist game against Skelly's wrestler approach. Knight is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Skelly looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Knight throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Knight is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Knight has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Jason Knight over Chas Skelly.** We're leaning Knight here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Knight at 49% implied while our model sees 66% — a 17-point disagreement that could signal value.

63%
Chase Sherman
Sherman
4-10
Elo 822
Striker
VS
Coulter
0-3
Elo 757

The Heavyweight matchup features Chase Sherman (4-10) taking on Rashad Coulter (0-3). Sherman is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Sherman carries a modest Elo edge (822 to 757), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sherman throws significantly more leather — a 3.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Coulter is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Coulter has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Chase Sherman over Rashad Coulter.** The model gives Sherman a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Sherman at 51% implied while our model sees 63% — a 13-point disagreement that could signal value.

92%
James Vick
Vick
9-4
Elo 1026
All-Rounder
VS
Reyes
4-3
Elo 772
Striker

The Lightweight matchup features James Vick (9-4) taking on Marco Polo Reyes (4-3). Vick is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Vick is rated at 1026 — 254 points above Reyes's 772. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Vick's wrestler game against Reyes's striker approach. Vick looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Reyes brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Reyes throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Vick is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Reyes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: James Vick over Marco Polo Reyes.** The model is firm on this one: Vick at 92%. Notably, the betting market has Vick at 78% implied while our model sees 92% — a 14-point disagreement that could signal value.

Cortney Casey vs Jessica Aguilar

Women's Strawweight
74%
Cortney Casey
Casey
6-8
Elo 904
All-Rounder
VS
Aguilar
1-3
Elo 827

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Cortney Casey (6-8) taking on Jessica Aguilar (1-3). Casey is the bigger frame at 5'7" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Casey carries a modest Elo edge (904 to 827), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Aguilar throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Casey is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Aguilar has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Cortney Casey over Jessica Aguilar.** We're leaning Casey here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. Notably, the betting market has Casey at 58% implied while our model sees 74% — a 16-point disagreement that could signal value.

53%
Gabriel Benitez
Barzola
6-3
Elo 1071
Wrestler
VS
Benitez
7-7
Elo 856
All-Rounder

The Featherweight matchup features Enrique Barzola (6-3) taking on Gabriel Benitez (7-7).

Barzola is rated at 1071 — 215 points above Benitez's 856. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Barzola looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Benitez is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Barzola the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Benitez throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Barzola is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.3 more per 15 minutes. Barzola has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Gabriel Benitez over Enrique Barzola.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Benitez at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Barzola at 43% implied while our model sees 47% — a 4-point disagreement that could signal value.

81%
Gadzhimurad Antigulov
Antigulov
2-3
Elo 776
Submission Artist
VS
Christensen
1-2
Elo 862

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Gadzhimurad Antigulov (2-3) taking on Joachim Christensen (1-2). Christensen is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Christensen at 862 versus Antigulov at 776. That 87-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Christensen throws significantly more leather — a 4.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Antigulov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 13.4 more per 15 minutes. Antigulov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Gadzhimurad Antigulov over Joachim Christensen.** The model is firm on this one: Antigulov at 81%. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.