UFC Fight Night: Henderson vs Khabilov: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, June 7, 2014·Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Published April 21, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Henderson vs Khabilov lands on Saturday, June 7, 2014 in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA with 11 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Benson Henderson vs Rustam KhabilovLightweightRustam KhabilovToss-up52%
Diego Sanchez vs Ross PearsonLightweightRoss PearsonLean55%
John Dodson vs John MoragaFlyweightJohn DodsonLean59%
Rafael Dos Anjos vs Jason HighLightweightRafael Dos AnjosConfident71%
Piotr Hallmann vs Yves EdwardsLightweightPiotr HallmannConfident68%
Bryan Caraway vs Erik PerezBantamweightErik PerezToss-up53%
Sergio Pettis vs Yaotzin MezaBantamweightSergio PettisConfident72%
Lance Benoist vs Bobby VoelkerWelterweightLance BenoistStrong76%
Scott Jorgensen vs Danny MartinezFlyweightDanny MartinezLean61%
Jon Tuck vs Jake LindseyLightweightJon TuckToss-up50%
Patrick Cummins vs Roger NarvaezLight HeavyweightPatrick CumminsToss-up51%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Benson Henderson vs Rustam Khabilov

LightweightTitle Fight
52%
Rustam Khabilov
Henderson
11-3
CH-III1610
All-Rounder
VS
Khabilov
10-3
CO-I1501
Striker
Over/UnderOver 67%
Under 33%Over 67%

The Lightweight championship matchup features Benson Henderson (11-3) taking on Rustam Khabilov (10-3). Khabilov will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Henderson at 1610 versus Khabilov at 1501. That 109-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Henderson's all-rounder game against Khabilov's striker approach. Henderson is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Khabilov brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Henderson throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Khabilov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.3 more per 15 minutes. Henderson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rustam Khabilov over Benson Henderson. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Khabilov at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

55%
Ross Pearson
Sanchez
19-13
CO-III1216
Striker
VS
Pearson
12-13
MC-II958
Striker
Over/UnderOver 57%
Under 43%Over 57%

The Lightweight matchup features Diego Sanchez (19-13) taking on Ross Pearson (12-13). Sanchez is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Sanchez is rated at 1216 — 258 points above Pearson's 958. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Sanchez's all-rounder game against Pearson's striker approach. Sanchez is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Pearson brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pearson throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Pearson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Pearson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ross Pearson over Diego Sanchez. The model gives Pearson a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

59%
John Dodson
Dodson
10-7
CO-II1376
Striker
VS
Moraga
8-6
CO-III1225
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 60%
Under 40%Over 60%

The Flyweight matchup features John Dodson (10-7) taking on John Moraga (8-6). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Moraga.

Dodson is rated at 1376 — 151 points above Moraga's 1225. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Moraga has won 3 straight.

Stylistically this is Dodson's striker game against Moraga's wrestler approach. Dodson brings a versatile approach, while Moraga looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dodson throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Moraga is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Dodson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: John Dodson over John Moraga. The model gives Dodson a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

71%
Rafael Dos Anjos
Anjos
21-15
CO-II1443
Wrestler
VS
High
2-3
RK-I1168
Over/UnderUnder 52%
Under 52%Over 48%

The Lightweight matchup features Rafael Dos Anjos (21-15) taking on Jason High (2-3). High will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Anjos is rated at 1443 — 275 points above High's 1168. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Anjos throws significantly more leather — a 2.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Anjos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Anjos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rafael Dos Anjos over Jason High. We're leaning Anjos here at 71%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

68%
Piotr Hallmann
Hallmann
2-4
MC-II938
Wrestler
VS
Edwards
10-10
MC-III913
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 52%
Under 52%Over 48%

The Lightweight matchup features Piotr Hallmann (2-4) taking on Yves Edwards (10-10).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Hallmann at 938, Edwards at 913. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

The style clash matters here: Hallmann looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Edwards is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Hallmann the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hallmann throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Hallmann is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.9 more per 15 minutes. Edwards has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Piotr Hallmann over Yves Edwards. We're leaning Hallmann here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Bryan Caraway vs Erik Perez

Bantamweight
53%
Erik Perez
Caraway
6-4
CO-III1281
Wrestler
VS
Perez
7-2
CO-II1353
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Bantamweight matchup features Bryan Caraway (6-4) taking on Erik Perez (7-2).

Perez carries a modest Elo edge (1353 to 1281), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Caraway's wrestler game against Perez's knockout artist approach. Caraway looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Perez is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Perez throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Perez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Perez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Erik Perez over Bryan Caraway. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Perez at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

72%
Sergio Pettis
Pettis
9-5
CO-III1314
Striker
VS
Meza
2-4
MC-III902
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Bantamweight matchup features Sergio Pettis (9-5) taking on Yaotzin Meza (2-4). Meza is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Pettis is rated at 1314 — 412 points above Meza's 902. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Pettis's striker game against Meza's wrestler approach. Pettis brings a versatile approach, while Meza looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pettis throws significantly more leather — a 3.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Pettis is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Pettis has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Sergio Pettis over Yaotzin Meza. We're leaning Pettis here at 72%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

76%
Lance Benoist
Benoist
2-2
RK-III1048
VS
Voelker
0-4
UC-III652
Over/UnderOver 62%
Under 38%Over 62%

The Welterweight matchup features Lance Benoist (2-2) taking on Bobby Voelker (0-4).

Benoist is rated at 1048 — 397 points above Voelker's 652. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Voelker throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Voelker is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Benoist has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Lance Benoist over Bobby Voelker. The model is firm on this one: Benoist at 76%.

61%
Danny Martinez
Jorgensen
4-8
UC-I744
Wrestler
VS
Martinez
1-3
PR-II860
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Flyweight matchup features Scott Jorgensen (4-8) taking on Danny Martinez (1-3).

There's a real Elo separation here: Martinez at 860 versus Jorgensen at 744. That 116-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jorgensen throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Martinez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.4 more per 15 minutes. Martinez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Danny Martinez over Scott Jorgensen. The model gives Martinez a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

Jon Tuck vs Jake Lindsey

Lightweight
50%
Jon Tuck
Tuck
4-5
RK-III1041
Wrestler
VS
Lindsey
0-3
UC-III631
Over/UnderUnder 50%
Under 50%Over 50%

The Lightweight matchup features Jon Tuck (4-5) taking on Jake Lindsey (0-3).

Tuck is rated at 1041 — 410 points above Lindsey's 631. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Tuck throws significantly more leather — a 3.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Lindsey is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Lindsey has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jon Tuck over Jake Lindsey. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Tuck at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Patrick Cummins vs Roger Narvaez

Light Heavyweight
51%
Patrick Cummins
Cummins
6-7
RK-III1032
Striker
VS
Narvaez
1-2
MC-III917
Over/UnderUnder 60%
Under 60%Over 40%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Patrick Cummins (6-7) taking on Roger Narvaez (1-2).

There's a real Elo separation here: Cummins at 1032 versus Narvaez at 917. That 115-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cummins throws significantly more leather — a 6.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Narvaez is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Narvaez has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Patrick Cummins over Roger Narvaez. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Cummins at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.