UFC Fight Night: Brown vs Silva: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, May 10, 2014·Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Published April 18, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Brown vs Silva lands on Saturday, May 10, 2014 in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA with 13 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Matt Brown vs Erick SilvaWelterweightMatt BrownConfident70%
Constantinos Philippou vs Lorenz LarkinMiddleweightConstantinos PhilippouLean58%
Daron Cruickshank vs Erik KochLightweightDaron CruickshankToss-up53%
Neil Magny vs Tim MeansWelterweightNeil MagnyLean63%
Soa Palelei vs Ruan PottsHeavyweightSoa PaleleiLean64%
Chris Cariaso vs Louis SmolkaFlyweightChris CariasoLean64%
Ed Herman vs Rafael NatalMiddleweightEd HermanLean57%
Kyoji Horiguchi vs Darrell MontagueFlyweightKyoji HoriguchiStrong78%
Zak Cummings vs Yan CabralWelterweightZak CummingsConfident65%
Johnny Eduardo vs Eddie WinelandBantamweightEddie WinelandLean57%
Nik Lentz vs Manvel GamburyanFeatherweightNik LentzConfident70%
Justin Salas vs Ben WallLightweightJustin SalasStrong76%
Albert Tumenov vs Anthony LapsleyWelterweightAlbert TumenovLean60%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Matt Brown vs Erick Silva

Welterweight
70%
Matt Brown
Brown
17-13
CO-III1256
All-Rounder
VS
Silva
7-8
RK-III1061
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Welterweight matchup features Matt Brown (17-13) taking on Erick Silva (7-8).

Brown is rated at 1256 — 195 points above Silva's 1061. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Brown's knockout artist game against Silva's submission artist approach. Brown is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Silva is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Brown throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Brown is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Brown has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Matt Brown over Erick Silva. We're leaning Brown here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

58%
Constantinos Philippou
Philippou
6-4
CO-III1265
Striker
VS
Larkin
5-5
CO-I1572
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 52%
Under 52%Over 48%

The Middleweight matchup features Constantinos Philippou (6-4) taking on Lorenz Larkin (5-5).

Larkin is rated at 1572 — 307 points above Philippou's 1265. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Larkin throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Larkin is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Larkin has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Constantinos Philippou over Lorenz Larkin. The model gives Philippou a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

53%
Daron Cruickshank
Cruickshank
6-6
MC-II957
Wrestler
VS
Koch
5-5
RK-III1054
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Lightweight matchup features Daron Cruickshank (6-6) taking on Erik Koch (5-5).

There's a real Elo separation here: Koch at 1054 versus Cruickshank at 957. That 96-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Cruickshank's all-rounder game against Koch's knockout artist approach. Cruickshank is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Koch is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cruickshank throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Cruickshank is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Cruickshank has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Daron Cruickshank over Erik Koch. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Cruickshank at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Neil Magny vs Tim Means

Welterweight
63%
Neil Magny
Magny
24-13
CO-II1418
Wrestler
VS
Means
15-14
RK-III1042
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Welterweight matchup features Neil Magny (24-13) taking on Tim Means (15-14). Magny will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

Magny is rated at 1418 — 376 points above Means's 1042. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Magny looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Means is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Magny the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Means throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Magny is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.2 more per 15 minutes. Magny has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Neil Magny over Tim Means. The model gives Magny a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

Soa Palelei vs Ruan Potts

Heavyweight
64%
Soa Palelei
Palelei
4-3
RK-II1114
Striker
VS
Potts
0-3
UC-III659
Over/UnderUnder 63%
Under 63%Over 37%

The Heavyweight matchup features Soa Palelei (4-3) taking on Ruan Potts (0-3). Palelei is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Palelei is rated at 1114 — 455 points above Potts's 659. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Palelei throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Palelei is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.3 more per 15 minutes. Potts has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Soa Palelei over Ruan Potts. The model gives Palelei a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

64%
Chris Cariaso
Cariaso
7-6
RK-III1015
All-Rounder
VS
Smolka
8-9
MC-II951
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Flyweight matchup features Chris Cariaso (7-6) taking on Louis Smolka (8-9). Smolka is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Cariaso carries a modest Elo edge (1015 to 951), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Smolka throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Cariaso is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Smolka has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chris Cariaso over Louis Smolka. The model gives Cariaso a slight nod at 64% — this could easily go either way.

Ed Herman vs Rafael Natal

Middleweight
57%
Ed Herman
Herman
13-12
RK-I1139
All-Rounder
VS
Natal
9-7-1
RK-III1035
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Middleweight matchup features Ed Herman (13-12) taking on Rafael Natal (9-7-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Herman at 1139 versus Natal at 1035. That 104-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Herman's submission artist game against Natal's knockout artist approach. Herman is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Natal is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Natal throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Natal is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Natal has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ed Herman over Rafael Natal. The model gives Herman a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

78%
Kyoji Horiguchi
Horiguchi
9-1
CO-I1584
All-Rounder
VS
Montague
0-3
UC-II694
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Flyweight matchup features Kyoji Horiguchi (9-1) taking on Darrell Montague (0-3). Montague is the bigger frame at 5'6" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Horiguchi is rated at 1584 — 890 points above Montague's 694. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Horiguchi rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Horiguchi throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Horiguchi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Montague has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kyoji Horiguchi over Darrell Montague. The model is firm on this one: Horiguchi at 78%.

Zak Cummings vs Yan Cabral

Welterweight
65%
Zak Cummings
Cummings
10-4
CO-II1433
All-Rounder
VS
Cabral
2-3
MC-III912
Over/UnderOver 52%
Under 48%Over 52%

The Welterweight matchup features Zak Cummings (10-4) taking on Yan Cabral (2-3).

Cummings is rated at 1433 — 521 points above Cabral's 912. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cabral throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Cummings is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.0 more per 15 minutes. Cabral has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Zak Cummings over Yan Cabral. We're leaning Cummings here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

57%
Eddie Wineland
Eduardo
3-5
MC-III929
All-Rounder
VS
Wineland
6-10
RK-III1019
Striker
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Bantamweight matchup features Johnny Eduardo (3-5) taking on Eddie Wineland (6-10).

There's a real Elo separation here: Wineland at 1019 versus Eduardo at 929. That 91-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Eduardo's all-rounder game against Wineland's striker approach. Eduardo is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Wineland brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Wineland throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Wineland is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Eduardo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Eddie Wineland over Johnny Eduardo. The model gives Wineland a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

Nik Lentz vs Manvel Gamburyan

Featherweight
70%
Nik Lentz
Lentz
14-9-1
CO-III1262
All-Rounder
VS
Gamburyan
6-8
RK-III1057
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 61%
Under 39%Over 61%

The Featherweight matchup features Nik Lentz (14-9-1) taking on Manvel Gamburyan (6-8). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Lentz.

Lentz is rated at 1262 — 206 points above Gamburyan's 1057. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lentz throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Lentz is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Gamburyan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Nik Lentz over Manvel Gamburyan. We're leaning Lentz here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Justin Salas vs Ben Wall

Lightweight
76%
Justin Salas
Salas
3-4
PR-II842
Striker
VS
Wall
0-2
UC-II688
Over/UnderOver 50%
Under 50%Over 50%

The Lightweight matchup features Justin Salas (3-4) taking on Ben Wall (0-2).

Salas is rated at 842 — 155 points above Wall's 688. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Salas throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Salas is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.1 more per 15 minutes. Salas has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Justin Salas over Ben Wall. The model is firm on this one: Salas at 76%.

60%
Albert Tumenov
Tumenov
5-3
CO-III1202
Striker
VS
Lapsley
0-2
UC-II720
Over/UnderUnder 57%
Under 57%Over 43%

The Welterweight matchup features Albert Tumenov (5-3) taking on Anthony Lapsley (0-2).

Tumenov is rated at 1202 — 482 points above Lapsley's 720. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Tumenov throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Tumenov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Lapsley has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Albert Tumenov over Anthony Lapsley. The model gives Tumenov a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.