UFC Fight Night: Shogun vs Henderson 2: Predictions & Analysis

Sunday, March 23, 2014·Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Shogun vs Henderson 2 lands on Sunday, March 23, 2014 in Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Dan Henderson vs Mauricio RuaLight HeavyweightMauricio RuaConfident67%
CB Dollaway vs Cezar FerreiraMiddleweightCB DollawayLean62%
Leonardo Santos vs Norman ParkeLightweightNorman ParkeConfident66%
Fabio Maldonado vs Gian VillanteLight HeavyweightGian VillanteToss-up55%
Michel Prazeres vs Mairbek TaisumovLightweightMairbek TaisumovLean58%
Rony Jason vs Steven SilerFeatherweightRony JasonToss-up53%
Thiago Santos vs Ronny MarkesMiddleweightRonny MarkesConfident68%
Jussier Formiga vs Scott JorgensenFlyweightJussier FormigaConfident74%
Kenny Robertson vs Thiago PerpetuoWelterweightKenny RobertsonLean56%
Hans Stringer vs Francimar BarrosoLight HeavyweightFrancimar BarrosoConfident69%
Godofredo Pepey vs Noad LahatFeatherweightGodofredo PepeyLean55%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Dan Henderson vs Mauricio Rua

Light Heavyweight
67%
Mauricio Rua
Henderson
9-8
Elo 1404
Striker
VS
Rua
11-11-1
Elo 876
Striker

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Dan Henderson (9-8) taking on Mauricio Rua (11-11-1). Rua is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Henderson is rated at 1404 — 528 points above Rua's 876. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rua throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Rua is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Henderson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mauricio Rua over Dan Henderson. We're leaning Rua here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

62%
CB Dollaway
Dollaway
11-8
Elo 965
Wrestler
VS
Ferreira
9-5
Elo 1033
Wrestler

The Middleweight matchup features CB Dollaway (11-8) taking on Cezar Ferreira (9-5).

Ferreira carries a modest Elo edge (1033 to 965), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Dollaway throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Dollaway is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Dollaway has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: CB Dollaway over Cezar Ferreira. The model gives Dollaway a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

66%
Norman Parke
Santos
7-2-1
Elo 1039
All-Rounder
VS
Parke
5-2-1
Elo 1101
Striker

The Lightweight matchup features Leonardo Santos (7-2-1) taking on Norman Parke (5-2-1). Santos will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

Parke carries a modest Elo edge (1101 to 1039), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Santos's all-rounder game against Parke's striker approach. Santos is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Parke brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Parke throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Parke is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Parke has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Norman Parke over Leonardo Santos. We're leaning Parke here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Fabio Maldonado vs Gian Villante

Light Heavyweight
55%
Gian Villante
Maldonado
5-5
Elo 1043
Knockout Artist
VS
Villante
7-10
Elo 705
Striker

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Fabio Maldonado (5-5) taking on Gian Villante (7-10).

Maldonado is rated at 1043 — 338 points above Villante's 705. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Maldonado's all-rounder game against Villante's striker approach. Maldonado is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Villante brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Maldonado throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Villante is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Maldonado has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Gian Villante over Fabio Maldonado. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Villante at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

58%
Mairbek Taisumov
Prazeres
10-3
Elo 1157
Wrestler
VS
Taisumov
7-1
Elo 1362
Striker

The Lightweight matchup features Michel Prazeres (10-3) taking on Mairbek Taisumov (7-1). Taisumov is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

Taisumov is rated at 1362 — 206 points above Prazeres's 1157. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Taisumov has won 6 straight.

Stylistically this is Prazeres's wrestler game against Taisumov's striker approach. Prazeres looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Taisumov brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Taisumov throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Taisumov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Taisumov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mairbek Taisumov over Michel Prazeres. The model gives Taisumov a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Rony Jason vs Steven Siler

Featherweight
53%
Rony Jason
Jason
4-3
Elo 1010
All-Rounder
VS
Siler
5-3
Elo 888
Wrestler

The Featherweight matchup features Rony Jason (4-3) taking on Steven Siler (5-3). Jason will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Jason at 1010 versus Siler at 888. That 122-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

The style clash matters here: Jason is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Siler looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Siler the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jason throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Siler is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Jason has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Rony Jason over Steven Siler. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Jason at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

68%
Ronny Markes
Santos
14-9
Elo 1292
Striker
VS
Markes
3-1
Elo 918

The Middleweight matchup features Thiago Santos (14-9) taking on Ronny Markes (3-1).

Santos is rated at 1292 — 375 points above Markes's 918. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Markes throws significantly more leather — a 2.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Markes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.2 more per 15 minutes. Markes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ronny Markes over Thiago Santos. We're leaning Markes here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

74%
Jussier Formiga
Formiga
9-6
Elo 1149
Wrestler
VS
Jorgensen
4-7
Elo 735
Wrestler

The Flyweight matchup features Jussier Formiga (9-6) taking on Scott Jorgensen (4-7).

Formiga is rated at 1149 — 414 points above Jorgensen's 735. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Formiga looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Jorgensen is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Formiga the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jorgensen throws significantly more leather — a 2.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Formiga is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Formiga has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jussier Formiga over Scott Jorgensen. We're leaning Formiga here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

56%
Kenny Robertson
Robertson
4-4
Elo 1097
Wrestler
VS
Perpetuo
1-1
Elo 855

The Welterweight matchup features Kenny Robertson (4-4) taking on Thiago Perpetuo (1-1).

Robertson is rated at 1097 — 242 points above Perpetuo's 855. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Perpetuo throws significantly more leather — a 3.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Perpetuo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Perpetuo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kenny Robertson over Thiago Perpetuo. The model gives Robertson a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

Hans Stringer vs Francimar Barroso

Light Heavyweight
69%
Francimar Barroso
Stringer
1-1
Elo 839
VS
Barroso
4-3
Elo 961
Striker

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Hans Stringer (1-1) taking on Francimar Barroso (4-3).

There's a real Elo separation here: Barroso at 961 versus Stringer at 839. That 122-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Barroso throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Barroso is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Stringer has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Francimar Barroso over Hans Stringer. We're leaning Barroso here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Godofredo Pepey vs Noad Lahat

Featherweight
55%
Godofredo Pepey
Pepey
5-5
Elo 1026
Wrestler
VS
Lahat
2-1
Elo 919

The Featherweight matchup features Godofredo Pepey (5-5) taking on Noad Lahat (2-1). Pepey will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Pepey at 1026 versus Lahat at 919. That 107-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pepey throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Pepey is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Lahat has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Godofredo Pepey over Noad Lahat. The model gives Pepey a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.