UFC 171: Hendricks vs Lawler: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, March 15, 2014·Dallas, Texas, USA

UFC 171: Hendricks vs Lawler lands on Saturday, March 15, 2014 in Dallas, Texas, USA with 13 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Johny Hendricks vs Robbie LawlerWelterweightJohny HendricksConfident65%
Tyron Woodley vs Carlos ConditWelterweightCarlos ConditLean61%
Myles Jury vs Diego SanchezLightweightMyles JuryStrong77%
Hector Lombard vs Jake ShieldsWelterweightJake ShieldsToss-up52%
Ovince Saint Preux vs Nikita KrylovLight HeavyweightNikita KrylovLean58%
Kelvin Gastelum vs Rick StoryWelterweightRick StoryLean60%
Jessica Andrade vs Raquel PenningtonWomen's BantamweightJessica AndradeToss-up53%
Dennis Bermudez vs Jimy HettesFeatherweightJimy HettesToss-up51%
Alex Garcia vs Sean SpencerWelterweightAlex GarciaConfident69%
Francisco Trevino vs Renee ForteLightweightRenee ForteLean60%
Justin Scoggins vs Will CampuzanoFlyweightJustin ScogginsStrong77%
Sean Strickland vs Robert McDanielMiddleweightSean StricklandToss-up50%
Robert Whiteford vs Daniel PinedaFeatherweightDaniel PinedaConfident67%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Johny Hendricks vs Robbie Lawler

WelterweightTitle Fight
65%
Johny Hendricks
Hendricks
13-7
Elo 1068
Striker
VS
Lawler
14-10
Elo 1297
Striker

The Welterweight championship matchup features Johny Hendricks (13-7) taking on Robbie Lawler (14-10). Lawler is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Lawler is rated at 1297 — 228 points above Hendricks's 1068. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hendricks throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Hendricks is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.4 more per 15 minutes. Lawler has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Johny Hendricks over Robbie Lawler.** We're leaning Hendricks here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

61%
Carlos Condit
Woodley
9-5-1
Elo 1461
All-Rounder
VS
Condit
9-9
Elo 1165
All-Rounder

The Welterweight matchup features Tyron Woodley (9-5-1) taking on Carlos Condit (9-9). There's a 5-inch height gap favoring Condit.

Woodley is rated at 1461 — 296 points above Condit's 1165. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Woodley throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Condit is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Woodley has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Carlos Condit over Tyron Woodley.** The model gives Condit a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

77%
Myles Jury
Jury
8-3
Elo 1141
All-Rounder
VS
Sanchez
19-12
Elo 1139
Striker

The Lightweight matchup features Myles Jury (8-3) taking on Diego Sanchez (19-12).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Jury at 1141, Sanchez at 1139. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sanchez throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Jury is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.2 more per 15 minutes. Jury has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Myles Jury over Diego Sanchez.** The model is firm on this one: Jury at 77%.

52%
Jake Shields
Lombard
3-7
Elo 964
All-Rounder
VS
Shields
4-2
Elo 1232
Striker

The Welterweight matchup features Hector Lombard (3-7) taking on Jake Shields (4-2). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Shields.

Shields is rated at 1232 — 267 points above Lombard's 964. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Lombard's all-rounder game against Shields's striker approach. Lombard is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Shields brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Shields throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Shields is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Shields has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Jake Shields over Hector Lombard.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Shields at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Ovince Saint Preux vs Nikita Krylov

Light Heavyweight
58%
Nikita Krylov
Preux
15-12
Elo 917
All-Rounder
VS
Krylov
11-9
Elo 1400
Submission Artist

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Ovince Saint Preux (15-12) taking on Nikita Krylov (11-9). Preux will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Krylov is rated at 1400 — 483 points above Preux's 917. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Preux is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Krylov is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, submission artists own a 56% win rate against all-rounders, giving Krylov the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Krylov throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Krylov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Preux has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Nikita Krylov over Ovince Saint Preux.** The model gives Krylov a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

60%
Rick Story
Gastelum
13-10
Elo 1340
All-Rounder
VS
Story
12-6
Elo 1358
All-Rounder

The Welterweight matchup features Kelvin Gastelum (13-10) taking on Rick Story (12-6).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Gastelum at 1340, Story at 1358. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets. Story has won 3 straight.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Story throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Gastelum is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Story has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Rick Story over Kelvin Gastelum.** The model gives Story a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Jessica Andrade vs Raquel Pennington

Women's Bantamweight
53%
Jessica Andrade
Andrade
17-12
Elo 1115
Knockout Artist
VS
Pennington
13-5
Elo 1411
All-Rounder

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Jessica Andrade (17-12) taking on Raquel Pennington (13-5). Pennington is the bigger frame at 5'7" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Pennington is rated at 1411 — 296 points above Andrade's 1115. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Pennington has won 6 straight.

Stylistically this is Andrade's knockout artist game against Pennington's all-rounder approach. Andrade is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Pennington is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Andrade throws significantly more leather — a 3.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Andrade is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Pennington has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Jessica Andrade over Raquel Pennington.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Andrade at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

51%
Jimy Hettes
Bermudez
9-7
Elo 1068
Wrestler
VS
Hettes
3-2
Elo 931
Wrestler

The Featherweight matchup features Dennis Bermudez (9-7) taking on Jimy Hettes (3-2). Hettes is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Bermudez at 1068 versus Hettes at 931. That 138-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Bermudez throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Hettes is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.5 more per 15 minutes. Hettes has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Jimy Hettes over Dennis Bermudez.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Hettes at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Alex Garcia vs Sean Spencer

Welterweight
69%
Alex Garcia
Garcia
5-4
Elo 1006
Wrestler
VS
Spencer
3-4
Elo 862
Striker

The Welterweight matchup features Alex Garcia (5-4) taking on Sean Spencer (3-4).

There's a real Elo separation here: Garcia at 1006 versus Spencer at 862. That 145-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Garcia's wrestler game against Spencer's striker approach. Garcia looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Spencer brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Garcia throws significantly more leather — a 7.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Spencer is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Garcia has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Alex Garcia over Sean Spencer.** We're leaning Garcia here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

60%
Renee Forte
Trevino
1-1
Elo 880
VS
Forte
1-2
Elo 864

The Lightweight matchup features Francisco Trevino (1-1) taking on Renee Forte (1-2).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Trevino at 880, Forte at 864. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Forte throws significantly more leather — a 2.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Forte is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Trevino has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Renee Forte over Francisco Trevino.** The model gives Forte a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

77%
Justin Scoggins
Scoggins
4-4
Elo 861
Striker
VS
Campuzano
0-3
Elo 763

The Flyweight matchup features Justin Scoggins (4-4) taking on Will Campuzano (0-3). Campuzano is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Scoggins at 861 versus Campuzano at 763. That 98-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Scoggins throws significantly more leather — a 3.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Scoggins is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.7 more per 15 minutes. Scoggins has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Justin Scoggins over Will Campuzano.** The model is firm on this one: Scoggins at 77%.

50%
Sean Strickland
Strickland
16-7
Elo 1813
All-Rounder
VS
McDaniel
1-1
Elo 924

The Middleweight matchup features Sean Strickland (16-7) taking on Robert McDaniel (1-1).

Strickland is rated at 1813 — 889 points above McDaniel's 924. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. McDaniel throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. McDaniel is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Strickland has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Sean Strickland over Robert McDaniel.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Strickland at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

67%
Daniel Pineda
Whiteford
2-2
Elo 959
VS
Pineda
5-7
Elo 979
Wrestler

The Featherweight matchup features Robert Whiteford (2-2) taking on Daniel Pineda (5-7).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Whiteford at 959, Pineda at 979. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pineda throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Pineda is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Pineda has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Daniel Pineda over Robert Whiteford.** We're leaning Pineda here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.