UFC Fight Night: Gustafsson vs Manuwa: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, March 8, 2014·London, England, United Kingdom
Published April 17, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Gustafsson vs Manuwa lands on Saturday, March 8, 2014 in London, England, United Kingdom with 9 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Alexander Gustafsson vs Jimi ManuwaLight HeavyweightAlexander GustafssonConfident68%
Michael Johnson vs Melvin GuillardLightweightMichael JohnsonToss-up54%
Brad Pickett vs Neil SeeryFlyweightBrad PickettLean63%
Gunnar Nelson vs Omari AkhmedovWelterweightGunnar NelsonConfident67%
Ilir Latifi vs Cyrille DiabateLight HeavyweightIlir LatifiLean59%
Luke Barnatt vs Mats NilssonMiddleweightLuke BarnattStrong81%
Claudio Silva vs Brad ScottMiddleweightBrad ScottLean57%
Igor Araujo vs Danny MitchellWelterweightIgor AraujoConfident67%
Phil Harris vs Louis GaudinotFlyweightPhil HarrisLean58%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Alexander Gustafsson vs Jimi Manuwa

Light Heavyweight
68%
Alexander Gustafsson
Gustafsson
10-8
CO-II1367
All-Rounder
VS
Manuwa
6-6
RK-I1195
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderUnder 59%
Under 59%Over 41%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Alexander Gustafsson (10-8) taking on Jimi Manuwa (6-6). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Gustafsson.

Gustafsson is rated at 1367 — 172 points above Manuwa's 1195. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Gustafsson's all-rounder game against Manuwa's knockout artist approach. Gustafsson is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Manuwa is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Manuwa throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Manuwa is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Gustafsson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Alexander Gustafsson over Jimi Manuwa. We're leaning Gustafsson here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

54%
Michael Johnson
Johnson
16-16
RK-I1155
Striker
VS
Guillard
12-9
CO-III1260
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 53%
Under 47%Over 53%

The Lightweight matchup features Michael Johnson (16-16) taking on Melvin Guillard (12-9).

There's a real Elo separation here: Guillard at 1260 versus Johnson at 1155. That 105-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results. Johnson rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Johnson's striker game against Guillard's all-rounder approach. Johnson brings a versatile approach, while Guillard is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Guillard throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Johnson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Guillard has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Michael Johnson over Melvin Guillard. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Johnson at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

63%
Brad Pickett
Pickett
5-9
MC-II938
All-Rounder
VS
Seery
3-4
MC-I996
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Flyweight matchup features Brad Pickett (5-9) taking on Neil Seery (3-4). Pickett is the bigger frame at 5'6" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Seery carries a modest Elo edge (996 to 938), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Pickett is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Seery looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Seery the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pickett throws significantly more leather — a 3.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Pickett is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Seery has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brad Pickett over Neil Seery. The model gives Pickett a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

67%
Gunnar Nelson
Nelson
10-6
CO-II1437
Wrestler
VS
Akhmedov
9-5-1
CO-II1411
All-Rounder
Over/UnderUnder 56%
Under 56%Over 44%

The Welterweight matchup features Gunnar Nelson (10-6) taking on Omari Akhmedov (9-5-1).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Nelson at 1437, Akhmedov at 1411. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

The style clash matters here: Nelson looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Akhmedov is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Nelson the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Akhmedov throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Akhmedov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Nelson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Gunnar Nelson over Omari Akhmedov. We're leaning Nelson here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Ilir Latifi vs Cyrille Diabate

Light Heavyweight
59%
Ilir Latifi
Latifi
9-7
CO-III1309
Wrestler
VS
Diabate
4-4
PR-II862
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderUnder 63%
Under 63%Over 37%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Ilir Latifi (9-7) taking on Cyrille Diabate (4-4). Diabate is the bigger frame at 6'6" with a 8-inch reach advantage.

Latifi is rated at 1309 — 446 points above Diabate's 862. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Latifi's wrestler game against Diabate's knockout artist approach. Latifi looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Diabate is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Diabate throws significantly more leather — a 3.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Diabate is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Diabate has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ilir Latifi over Cyrille Diabate. The model gives Latifi a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

Luke Barnatt vs Mats Nilsson

Middleweight
81%
Luke Barnatt
Barnatt
3-3
RK-III1057
All-Rounder
VS
Nilsson
0-2
PR-I870
Over/UnderUnder 61%
Under 61%Over 39%

The Middleweight matchup features Luke Barnatt (3-3) taking on Mats Nilsson (0-2).

Barnatt is rated at 1057 — 187 points above Nilsson's 870. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Barnatt throws significantly more leather — a 6.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Barnatt is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Nilsson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Luke Barnatt over Mats Nilsson. The model is firm on this one: Barnatt at 81%.

Claudio Silva vs Brad Scott

Middleweight
57%
Brad Scott
Silva
5-3
RK-I1151
Wrestler
VS
Scott
3-5
MC-III906
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 59%
Under 59%Over 41%

The Middleweight matchup features Claudio Silva (5-3) taking on Brad Scott (3-5). Scott is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Silva is rated at 1151 — 245 points above Scott's 906. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Scott throws significantly more leather — a 3.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Scott is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Silva has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Brad Scott over Claudio Silva. The model gives Scott a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

67%
Igor Araujo
Araujo
2-2
MC-III929
VS
Mitchell
0-2
UC-I797
Over/UnderUnder 52%
Under 52%Over 48%

The Welterweight matchup features Igor Araujo (2-2) taking on Danny Mitchell (0-2).

There's a real Elo separation here: Araujo at 929 versus Mitchell at 797. That 132-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Araujo throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Araujo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Mitchell has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Igor Araujo over Danny Mitchell. We're leaning Araujo here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

58%
Phil Harris
Harris
1-3
UC-I792
VS
Gaudinot
1-3
PR-II867
Over/UnderOver 63%
Under 37%Over 63%

The Flyweight matchup features Phil Harris (1-3) taking on Louis Gaudinot (1-3).

Gaudinot carries a modest Elo edge (867 to 792), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Gaudinot throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Harris is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Harris has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Phil Harris over Louis Gaudinot. The model gives Harris a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.