UFC Fight Night: Belfort vs Henderson 2: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, November 9, 2013·Goiania, Goias, Brazil

UFC Fight Night: Belfort vs Henderson 2 lands on Saturday, November 9, 2013 in Goiania, Goias, Brazil with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Vitor Belfort vs Dan HendersonLight HeavyweightVitor BelfortLean60%
Cezar Ferreira vs Daniel SarafianMiddleweightCezar FerreiraLean60%
Rafael Cavalcante vs Igor PokrajacLight HeavyweightIgor PokrajacLean57%
Brandon Thatch vs Paulo ThiagoWelterweightBrandon ThatchConfident69%
Ryan LaFlare vs Santiago PonzinibbioWelterweightRyan LaFlareConfident68%
Jeremy Stephens vs Rony JasonFeatherweightRony JasonLean58%
Sam Sicilia vs Godofredo PepeyFeatherweightGodofredo PepeyToss-up51%
Omari Akhmedov vs Thiago PerpetuoMiddleweightThiago PerpetuoLean62%
Thiago Tavares vs Justin SalasLightweightThiago TavaresLean62%
Adriano Martins vs Daron CruickshankLightweightDaron CruickshankLean63%
Dustin Ortiz vs Jose MariaFlyweightJose MariaToss-up51%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Vitor Belfort vs Dan Henderson

Light Heavyweight
60%
Vitor Belfort
Belfort
15-9
Elo 1255
Knockout Artist
VS
Henderson
9-8
Elo 1404
Striker

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Vitor Belfort (15-9) taking on Dan Henderson (9-8).

There's a real Elo separation here: Henderson at 1404 versus Belfort at 1255. That 149-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Belfort's knockout artist game against Henderson's all-rounder approach. Belfort is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Henderson is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Henderson throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Henderson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Henderson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Vitor Belfort over Dan Henderson.** The model gives Belfort a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

60%
Cezar Ferreira
Ferreira
9-5
Elo 1033
Wrestler
VS
Sarafian
2-3
Elo 888
All-Rounder

The Middleweight matchup features Cezar Ferreira (9-5) taking on Daniel Sarafian (2-3). Ferreira is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Ferreira at 1033 versus Sarafian at 888. That 145-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

The style clash matters here: Ferreira looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Sarafian is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Ferreira the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ferreira throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Sarafian is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Sarafian has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Cezar Ferreira over Daniel Sarafian.** The model gives Ferreira a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Rafael Cavalcante vs Igor Pokrajac

Light Heavyweight
57%
Igor Pokrajac
Cavalcante
1-3
Elo 942
VS
Pokrajac
4-7
Elo 764
All-Rounder

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Rafael Cavalcante (1-3) taking on Igor Pokrajac (4-7).

Cavalcante is rated at 942 — 178 points above Pokrajac's 764. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cavalcante throws significantly more leather — a 2.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Pokrajac is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Cavalcante has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Igor Pokrajac over Rafael Cavalcante.** The model gives Pokrajac a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

69%
Brandon Thatch
Thatch
2-3
Elo 861
Striker
VS
Thiago
5-7
Elo 811
All-Rounder

The Welterweight matchup features Brandon Thatch (2-3) taking on Paulo Thiago (5-7). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Thatch.

Thatch carries a modest Elo edge (861 to 811), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Thatch's striker game against Thiago's wrestler approach. Thatch brings a versatile approach, while Thiago looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Thatch throws significantly more leather — a 10.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Thatch is far more active with takedowns, averaging 8.6 more per 15 minutes. Thatch has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Brandon Thatch over Paulo Thiago.** We're leaning Thatch here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

68%
Ryan LaFlare
LaFlare
7-2
Elo 1174
Striker
VS
Ponzinibbio
12-7
Elo 1177
Striker

The Welterweight matchup features Ryan LaFlare (7-2) taking on Santiago Ponzinibbio (12-7).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — LaFlare at 1174, Ponzinibbio at 1177. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. LaFlare throws significantly more leather — a 2.5 sig. strike per minute gap. LaFlare is far more active with takedowns, averaging 6.0 more per 15 minutes. Ponzinibbio has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Ryan LaFlare over Santiago Ponzinibbio.** We're leaning LaFlare here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Jeremy Stephens vs Rony Jason

Featherweight
58%
Rony Jason
Stephens
15-18
Elo 941
Striker
VS
Jason
4-3
Elo 1010
All-Rounder

The Featherweight matchup features Jeremy Stephens (15-18) taking on Rony Jason (4-3).

Jason carries a modest Elo edge (1010 to 941), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Stephens looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Jason is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Stephens the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jason throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Stephens is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.0 more per 15 minutes. Stephens has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Rony Jason over Jeremy Stephens.** The model gives Jason a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

51%
Godofredo Pepey
Sicilia
5-6
Elo 827
Wrestler
VS
Pepey
5-5
Elo 1026
Wrestler

The Featherweight matchup features Sam Sicilia (5-6) taking on Godofredo Pepey (5-5). Pepey will look to use a 6-inch reach edge to control distance.

Pepey is rated at 1026 — 199 points above Sicilia's 827. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sicilia throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Sicilia is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Sicilia has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Godofredo Pepey over Sam Sicilia.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Pepey at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

62%
Thiago Perpetuo
Akhmedov
9-4-1
Elo 1303
All-Rounder
VS
Perpetuo
1-1
Elo 855

The Middleweight matchup features Omari Akhmedov (9-4-1) taking on Thiago Perpetuo (1-1).

Akhmedov is rated at 1303 — 448 points above Perpetuo's 855. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Perpetuo throws significantly more leather — a 6.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Perpetuo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Akhmedov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Thiago Perpetuo over Omari Akhmedov.** The model gives Perpetuo a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

62%
Thiago Tavares
Tavares
10-6-1
Elo 1124
Wrestler
VS
Salas
3-3
Elo 843
Striker

The Lightweight matchup features Thiago Tavares (10-6-1) taking on Justin Salas (3-3).

Tavares is rated at 1124 — 281 points above Salas's 843. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Tavares's wrestler game against Salas's striker approach. Tavares looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Salas brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Salas throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Tavares is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Salas has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Thiago Tavares over Justin Salas.** The model gives Tavares a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

63%
Daron Cruickshank
Martins
4-2
Elo 1070
All-Rounder
VS
Cruickshank
6-5
Elo 879
Wrestler

The Lightweight matchup features Adriano Martins (4-2) taking on Daron Cruickshank (6-5).

Martins is rated at 1070 — 190 points above Cruickshank's 879. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Martins is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Cruickshank looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Cruickshank the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cruickshank throws significantly more leather — a 3.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Cruickshank is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Martins has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Daron Cruickshank over Adriano Martins.** The model gives Cruickshank a slight nod at 63% — this could easily go either way.

51%
Jose Maria
Ortiz
8-5
Elo 1329
Striker
VS
Maria
0-1
Elo 808

The Flyweight matchup features Dustin Ortiz (8-5) taking on Jose Maria (0-1).

Ortiz is rated at 1329 — 521 points above Maria's 808. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Ortiz rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Maria throws significantly more leather — a 3.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Maria is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.5 more per 15 minutes. Ortiz has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Jose Maria over Dustin Ortiz.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Maria at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.