UFC on FUEL TV: Mousasi vs Latifi: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, April 6, 2013·Stockholm, Sweden
Published April 22, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC on FUEL TV: Mousasi vs Latifi lands on Saturday, April 6, 2013 in Stockholm, Sweden with 13 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Gegard Mousasi vs Ilir LatifiLight HeavyweightGegard MousasiLean56%
Ross Pearson vs Ryan CoutureLightweightRoss PearsonConfident70%
Matt Mitrione vs Philip De FriesHeavyweightMatt MitrioneConfident69%
Brad Pickett vs Mike EastonBantamweightMike EastonLean61%
Diego Brandao vs Pablo GarzaFeatherweightDiego BrandaoConfident70%
Akira Corassani vs Robert PeraltaFeatherweightAkira CorassaniToss-up52%
Reza Madadi vs Michael JohnsonLightweightReza MadadiToss-up52%
Tor Troeng vs Adam CellaMiddleweightTor TroengToss-up51%
Adlan Amagov vs Chris SpangWelterweightChris SpangToss-up54%
Conor McGregor vs Marcus BrimageFeatherweightConor McGregorLean59%
Ryan LaFlare vs Ben AllowayWelterweightBen AllowayLean62%
Tom Lawlor vs Michael KuiperMiddleweightTom LawlorLean65%
Papy Abedi vs Besam YousefWelterweightBesam YousefToss-up53%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Gegard Mousasi vs Ilir Latifi

Light Heavyweight
56%
Gegard Mousasi
Mousasi
9-3
CH-I1837
All-Rounder
VS
Latifi
9-7
CO-III1309
Wrestler
Over/UnderUnder 53%
Under 53%Over 47%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Gegard Mousasi (9-3) taking on Ilir Latifi (9-7). Mousasi is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Mousasi is rated at 1837 — 528 points above Latifi's 1309. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Mousasi rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Mousasi is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Latifi looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Latifi the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Latifi throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Latifi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Latifi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Gegard Mousasi over Ilir Latifi. The model gives Mousasi a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

70%
Ross Pearson
Pearson
12-13
MC-II958
Striker
VS
Couture
0-2
UC-I767
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Lightweight matchup features Ross Pearson (12-13) taking on Ryan Couture (0-2). Couture is the bigger frame at 5'10" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

Pearson is rated at 958 — 191 points above Couture's 767. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pearson throws significantly more leather — a 4.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Pearson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Couture has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ross Pearson over Ryan Couture. We're leaning Pearson here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

69%
Matt Mitrione
Mitrione
9-5
CO-III1333
Striker
VS
Fries
2-3
PR-III832
Over/UnderUnder 62%
Under 62%Over 38%

The Heavyweight matchup features Matt Mitrione (9-5) taking on Philip De Fries (2-3). Mitrione will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Mitrione is rated at 1333 — 500 points above Fries's 832. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mitrione throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Fries is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.3 more per 15 minutes. Mitrione has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Matt Mitrione over Philip De Fries. We're leaning Mitrione here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Brad Pickett vs Mike Easton

Bantamweight
61%
Mike Easton
Pickett
5-9
MC-II938
All-Rounder
VS
Easton
3-4
RK-III1018
Striker
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Bantamweight matchup features Brad Pickett (5-9) taking on Mike Easton (3-4).

There's a real Elo separation here: Easton at 1018 versus Pickett at 938. That 81-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Pickett's all-rounder game against Easton's striker approach. Pickett is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Easton brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pickett throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Pickett is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Easton has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mike Easton over Brad Pickett. The model gives Easton a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way.

Diego Brandao vs Pablo Garza

Featherweight
70%
Diego Brandao
Brandao
6-4
CO-III1206
Submission Artist
VS
Garza
3-3
MC-III916
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Featherweight matchup features Diego Brandao (6-4) taking on Pablo Garza (3-3). Garza is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 9-inch reach advantage.

Brandao is rated at 1206 — 290 points above Garza's 916. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Brandao is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Garza looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 55% win rate against submission artists, giving Garza the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Garza throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Brandao is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Brandao has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Diego Brandao over Pablo Garza. We're leaning Brandao here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

52%
Akira Corassani
Corassani
3-3
PR-I875
Striker
VS
Peralta
4-3
RK-II1087
Striker
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Featherweight matchup features Akira Corassani (3-3) taking on Robert Peralta (4-3). Peralta will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Peralta is rated at 1087 — 212 points above Corassani's 875. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Peralta throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Peralta is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Peralta has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Akira Corassani over Robert Peralta. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Corassani at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

52%
Reza Madadi
Madadi
3-4
RK-II1096
Wrestler
VS
Johnson
16-16
RK-I1155
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 52%
Under 52%Over 48%

The Lightweight matchup features Reza Madadi (3-4) taking on Michael Johnson (16-16).

Johnson carries a modest Elo edge (1155 to 1096), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm. Johnson has won 3 straight.

Stylistically this is Madadi's wrestler game against Johnson's striker approach. Madadi looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Johnson brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Madadi throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Madadi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.9 more per 15 minutes. Madadi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Reza Madadi over Michael Johnson. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Madadi at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Tor Troeng vs Adam Cella

Middleweight
51%
Tor Troeng
Troeng
1-3
UC-I791
VS
Cella
0-1
PR-II834
Over/UnderUnder 62%
Under 62%Over 38%

The Middleweight matchup features Tor Troeng (1-3) taking on Adam Cella (0-1).

Cella carries a modest Elo edge (834 to 791), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cella throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Cella is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Cella has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tor Troeng over Adam Cella. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Troeng at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Adlan Amagov vs Chris Spang

Welterweight
54%
Chris Spang
Amagov
2-0
CO-II1434
VS
Spang
0-1
PR-I873
Over/UnderUnder 51%
Under 51%Over 49%

The Welterweight matchup features Adlan Amagov (2-0) taking on Chris Spang (0-1).

Amagov is rated at 1434 — 561 points above Spang's 873. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Spang throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Spang is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Spang has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Chris Spang over Adlan Amagov. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Spang at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

59%
Conor McGregor
McGregor
10-4
CH-III1685
Striker
VS
Brimage
4-4
UC-I787
Striker
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Featherweight matchup features Conor McGregor (10-4) taking on Marcus Brimage (4-4). McGregor is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

McGregor is rated at 1685 — 898 points above Brimage's 787. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Brimage throws significantly more leather — a 5.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Brimage is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. McGregor has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Conor McGregor over Marcus Brimage. The model gives McGregor a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

Ryan LaFlare vs Ben Alloway

Welterweight
62%
Ben Alloway
LaFlare
7-3
CO-III1248
Striker
VS
Alloway
1-2
PR-II834
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Welterweight matchup features Ryan LaFlare (7-3) taking on Ben Alloway (1-2).

LaFlare is rated at 1248 — 413 points above Alloway's 834. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Alloway throws significantly more leather — a 3.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Alloway is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. LaFlare has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ben Alloway over Ryan LaFlare. The model gives Alloway a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

Tom Lawlor vs Michael Kuiper

Middleweight
65%
Tom Lawlor
Lawlor
6-5
CO-III1245
Submission Artist
VS
Kuiper
1-3
UC-I754
Over/UnderUnder 53%
Under 53%Over 47%

The Middleweight matchup features Tom Lawlor (6-5) taking on Michael Kuiper (1-3).

Lawlor is rated at 1245 — 492 points above Kuiper's 754. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Kuiper throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Lawlor is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Lawlor has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tom Lawlor over Michael Kuiper. The model gives Lawlor a slight nod at 65% — this could easily go either way.

Papy Abedi vs Besam Yousef

Welterweight
53%
Besam Yousef
Abedi
1-3
PR-II836
VS
Yousef
0-2
UC-II715
Over/UnderUnder 53%
Under 53%Over 47%

The Welterweight matchup features Papy Abedi (1-3) taking on Besam Yousef (0-2).

There's a real Elo separation here: Abedi at 836 versus Yousef at 715. That 121-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Yousef throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Abedi is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Abedi has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Besam Yousef over Papy Abedi. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Yousef at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.