UFC 113: Machida vs Shogun 2: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, May 8, 2010·Montreal, Quebec, Canada

UFC 113: Machida vs Shogun 2 lands on Saturday, May 8, 2010 in Montreal, Quebec, Canada with 11 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Mauricio Rua vs Lyoto MachidaLight HeavyweightMauricio RuaLean59%
Josh Koscheck vs Paul DaleyWelterweightPaul DaleyLean55%
Jeremy Stephens vs Sam StoutLightweightJeremy StephensToss-up54%
Matt Mitrione vs Kevin FergusonHeavyweightMatt MitrioneConfident75%
Alan Belcher vs Patrick CoteMiddleweightAlan BelcherLean60%
Joe Doerksen vs Tom LawlorMiddleweightTom LawlorStrong79%
Marcus Davis vs Jonathan GouletWelterweightMarcus DavisToss-up55%
Johny Hendricks vs TJ GrantWelterweightTJ GrantToss-up51%
Joey Beltran vs Tim HagueHeavyweightJoey BeltranLean62%
Mike Guymon vs Yoshiyuki YoshidaWelterweightYoshiyuki YoshidaLean56%
John Salter vs Jason MacDonaldMiddleweightJohn SalterLean60%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Mauricio Rua vs Lyoto Machida

Light Heavyweight
59%
Mauricio Rua
Rua
11-11-1
Elo 876
Striker
VS
Machida
15-8
Elo 1493
All-Rounder

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Mauricio Rua (11-11-1) taking on Lyoto Machida (15-8).

Machida is rated at 1493 — 617 points above Rua's 876. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Rua brings a versatile approach, while Machida is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 54% win rate against strikers, giving Machida the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rua throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Rua is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Rua has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Mauricio Rua over Lyoto Machida.** The model gives Rua a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

Josh Koscheck vs Paul Daley

Welterweight
55%
Paul Daley
Koscheck
15-9
Elo 939
All-Rounder
VS
Daley
2-0
Elo 1292

The Welterweight matchup features Josh Koscheck (15-9) taking on Paul Daley (2-0). Daley will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Daley is rated at 1292 — 352 points above Koscheck's 939. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Daley throws significantly more leather — a 4.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Koscheck is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Daley has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Paul Daley over Josh Koscheck.** The model gives Daley a slight nod at 55% — this could easily go either way.

54%
Jeremy Stephens
Stephens
15-18
Elo 941
Striker
VS
Stout
9-10
Elo 756
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Jeremy Stephens (15-18) taking on Sam Stout (9-10).

Stephens is rated at 941 — 185 points above Stout's 756. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Stephens is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Stout brings a versatile approach. In our database, knockout artists own a 54% win rate against strikers, giving Stephens the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Stout throws significantly more leather — a 1.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Stephens is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Stout has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Jeremy Stephens over Sam Stout.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Stephens at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

75%
Matt Mitrione
Mitrione
9-4
Elo 1200
Striker
VS
Ferguson
1-0
Elo 947

The Heavyweight matchup features Matt Mitrione (9-4) taking on Kevin Ferguson (1-0). Mitrione will look to use a 5-inch reach edge to control distance.

Mitrione is rated at 1200 — 252 points above Ferguson's 947. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Mitrione throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Ferguson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.0 more per 15 minutes. Mitrione has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Matt Mitrione over Kevin Ferguson.** We're leaning Mitrione here at 75%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Alan Belcher vs Patrick Cote

Middleweight
60%
Alan Belcher
Belcher
9-5
Elo 1293
Knockout Artist
VS
Cote
10-10
Elo 1221
All-Rounder

The Middleweight matchup features Alan Belcher (9-5) taking on Patrick Cote (10-10). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Belcher.

Belcher carries a modest Elo edge (1293 to 1221), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Belcher's knockout artist game against Cote's all-rounder approach. Belcher is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Cote is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Belcher throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Cote is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Belcher has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Alan Belcher over Patrick Cote.** The model gives Belcher a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Joe Doerksen vs Tom Lawlor

Middleweight
79%
Tom Lawlor
Doerksen
2-6
Elo 925
Wrestler
VS
Lawlor
6-4
Elo 1205
Submission Artist

The Middleweight matchup features Joe Doerksen (2-6) taking on Tom Lawlor (6-4).

Lawlor is rated at 1205 — 280 points above Doerksen's 925. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Doerksen looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Lawlor is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, wrestlers own a 56% win rate against submission artists, giving Doerksen the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lawlor throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Lawlor is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.3 more per 15 minutes. Lawlor has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Tom Lawlor over Joe Doerksen.** The model is firm on this one: Lawlor at 79%.

55%
Marcus Davis
Davis
9-5
Elo 1032
All-Rounder
VS
Goulet
4-4
Elo 997
Submission Artist

The Welterweight matchup features Marcus Davis (9-5) taking on Jonathan Goulet (4-4). Goulet is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Davis carries a modest Elo edge (1032 to 997), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Davis looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Goulet is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, wrestlers own a 56% win rate against submission artists, giving Davis the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Davis throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Goulet is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.8 more per 15 minutes. Davis has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Marcus Davis over Jonathan Goulet.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Davis at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Johny Hendricks vs TJ Grant

Welterweight
51%
TJ Grant
Hendricks
13-7
Elo 1068
Striker
VS
Grant
7-3
Elo 1640
All-Rounder

The Welterweight matchup features Johny Hendricks (13-7) taking on TJ Grant (7-3). Grant will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Grant is rated at 1640 — 571 points above Hendricks's 1068. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Grant has won 4 straight.

Stylistically this is Hendricks's striker game against Grant's all-rounder approach. Hendricks brings a versatile approach, while Grant is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hendricks throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Hendricks is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.6 more per 15 minutes. Grant has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: TJ Grant over Johny Hendricks.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Grant at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Joey Beltran vs Tim Hague

Heavyweight
62%
Joey Beltran
Beltran
3-5
Elo 815
Striker
VS
Hague
1-3
Elo 819

The Heavyweight matchup features Joey Beltran (3-5) taking on Tim Hague (1-3). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Hague.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Beltran at 815, Hague at 819. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Beltran throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Hague is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.8 more per 15 minutes. Beltran has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Joey Beltran over Tim Hague.** The model gives Beltran a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

56%
Yoshiyuki Yoshida
Guymon
1-2
Elo 823
VS
Yoshida
2-2
Elo 943

The Welterweight matchup features Mike Guymon (1-2) taking on Yoshiyuki Yoshida (2-2). Guymon will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Yoshida at 943 versus Guymon at 823. That 120-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Yoshida throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Yoshida is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.4 more per 15 minutes. Guymon has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Yoshiyuki Yoshida over Mike Guymon.** The model gives Yoshida a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

60%
John Salter
Salter
1-1
Elo 916
VS
MacDonald
6-7
Elo 831
Submission Artist

The Middleweight matchup features John Salter (1-1) taking on Jason MacDonald (6-7). MacDonald is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 6-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Salter at 916 versus MacDonald at 831. That 85-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. MacDonald throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. MacDonald is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Salter has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: John Salter over Jason MacDonald.** The model gives Salter a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.