UFC 101: Declaration: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, August 8, 2009·Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Published February 27, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC 101: Declaration lands on Saturday, August 8, 2009 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA with 11 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
BJ Penn vs Kenny FlorianLightweightKenny FlorianLean58%
Anderson Silva vs Forrest GriffinLight HeavyweightAnderson SilvaConfident71%
Aaron Riley vs Shane NelsonLightweightShane NelsonConfident75%
Johny Hendricks vs Amir SadollahWelterweightAmir SadollahToss-up53%
Ricardo Almeida vs Kendall GroveMiddleweightRicardo AlmeidaLean57%
Kurt Pellegrino vs Josh NeerLightweightKurt PellegrinoToss-up52%
John Howard vs Tamdan McCroryWelterweightTamdan McCroryToss-up54%
Alessio Sakara vs Thales LeitesMiddleweightThales LeitesLean58%
Matthew Riddle vs Dan CramerWelterweightMatthew RiddleStrong80%
George Sotiropoulos vs George RoopLightweightGeorge SotiropoulosToss-up51%
Jesse Lennox vs Danillo VillefortWelterweightDanillo VillefortLean56%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

BJ Penn vs Kenny Florian

LightweightTitle Fight
58%
Kenny Florian
Penn
12-12-2
Elo 938
All-Rounder
VS
Florian
12-4
Elo 1304
Wrestler

The Lightweight championship matchup features BJ Penn (12-12-2) taking on Kenny Florian (12-4). Florian will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Florian is rated at 1304 — 367 points above Penn's 938. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Penn's knockout artist game against Florian's wrestler approach. Penn is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Florian looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Florian throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Florian is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.7 more per 15 minutes. Florian has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kenny Florian over BJ Penn. The model gives Florian a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Anderson Silva vs Forrest Griffin

Light Heavyweight
71%
Anderson Silva
Silva
17-6
Elo 1154
All-Rounder
VS
Griffin
9-5
Elo 1329
All-Rounder

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Anderson Silva (17-6) taking on Forrest Griffin (9-5).

Griffin is rated at 1329 — 176 points above Silva's 1154. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Silva's knockout artist game against Griffin's wrestler approach. Silva is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Griffin looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Griffin throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Griffin is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Silva has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Anderson Silva over Forrest Griffin. We're leaning Silva here at 71%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

75%
Shane Nelson
Riley
3-5
Elo 858
Striker
VS
Nelson
2-1
Elo 932

The Lightweight matchup features Aaron Riley (3-5) taking on Shane Nelson (2-1).

Nelson carries a modest Elo edge (932 to 858), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Riley throws significantly more leather — a 3.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Nelson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.6 more per 15 minutes. Nelson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Shane Nelson over Aaron Riley. We're leaning Nelson here at 75%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

53%
Amir Sadollah
Hendricks
13-7
Elo 1068
Striker
VS
Sadollah
6-4
Elo 946
All-Rounder

The Welterweight matchup features Johny Hendricks (13-7) taking on Amir Sadollah (6-4). Sadollah will look to use a 6-inch reach edge to control distance.

There's a real Elo separation here: Hendricks at 1068 versus Sadollah at 946. That 122-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Hendricks's striker game against Sadollah's all-rounder approach. Hendricks brings a versatile approach, while Sadollah is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sadollah throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Sadollah is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Hendricks has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Amir Sadollah over Johny Hendricks. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Sadollah at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

57%
Ricardo Almeida
Almeida
6-4
Elo 1189
Wrestler
VS
Grove
7-5
Elo 994
Knockout Artist

The Middleweight matchup features Ricardo Almeida (6-4) taking on Kendall Grove (7-5). Grove is the bigger frame at 6'6" with a 5-inch reach advantage.

Almeida is rated at 1189 — 195 points above Grove's 994. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Almeida is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Grove looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 56% win rate against submission artists, giving Grove the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Grove throws significantly more leather — a 1.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Almeida is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.5 more per 15 minutes. Almeida has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ricardo Almeida over Kendall Grove. The model gives Almeida a slight nod at 57% — this could easily go either way.

52%
Kurt Pellegrino
Pellegrino
7-4
Elo 1215
Wrestler
VS
Neer
6-8
Elo 872
Wrestler

The Lightweight matchup features Kurt Pellegrino (7-4) taking on Josh Neer (6-8). Neer is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Pellegrino is rated at 1215 — 343 points above Neer's 872. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Neer throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Pellegrino is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.7 more per 15 minutes. Pellegrino has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kurt Pellegrino over Josh Neer. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Pellegrino at 52%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

54%
Tamdan McCrory
Howard
7-6
Elo 932
Striker
VS
McCrory
4-4
Elo 976
Wrestler

The Welterweight matchup features John Howard (7-6) taking on Tamdan McCrory (4-4). McCrory is the bigger frame at 6'4" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

McCrory carries a modest Elo edge (976 to 932), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

Stylistically this is Howard's striker game against McCrory's submission artist approach. Howard brings a versatile approach, while McCrory is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. McCrory throws significantly more leather — a 1.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Howard is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.2 more per 15 minutes. McCrory has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tamdan McCrory over John Howard. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward McCrory at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

58%
Thales Leites
Sakara
6-7
Elo 931
Striker
VS
Leites
12-8
Elo 1176
Wrestler

The Middleweight matchup features Alessio Sakara (6-7) taking on Thales Leites (12-8). Leites will look to use a 6-inch reach edge to control distance.

Leites is rated at 1176 — 246 points above Sakara's 931. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Sakara's striker game against Leites's wrestler approach. Sakara brings a versatile approach, while Leites looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Sakara throws significantly more leather — a 3.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Leites is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Sakara has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Thales Leites over Alessio Sakara. The model gives Leites a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Matthew Riddle vs Dan Cramer

Welterweight
80%
Matthew Riddle
Riddle
7-3
Elo 1158
All-Rounder
VS
Cramer
1-0
Elo 995

The Welterweight matchup features Matthew Riddle (7-3) taking on Dan Cramer (1-0).

Riddle is rated at 1158 — 163 points above Cramer's 995. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Riddle throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Riddle is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.5 more per 15 minutes. Riddle has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Matthew Riddle over Dan Cramer. The model is firm on this one: Riddle at 80%.

51%
George Sotiropoulos
Sotiropoulos
7-3
Elo 918
Wrestler
VS
Roop
5-7
Elo 881
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features George Sotiropoulos (7-3) taking on George Roop (5-7). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Roop.

Sotiropoulos carries a modest Elo edge (918 to 881), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Sotiropoulos looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Roop is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Sotiropoulos the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Roop throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Sotiropoulos is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.5 more per 15 minutes. Sotiropoulos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: George Sotiropoulos over George Roop. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Sotiropoulos at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

56%
Danillo Villefort
Lennox
1-1
Elo 890
VS
Villefort
0-0
Elo 873

The Welterweight matchup features Jesse Lennox (1-1) taking on Danillo Villefort (0-0).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Lennox at 890, Villefort at 873. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Villefort throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Villefort is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Villefort has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Danillo Villefort over Jesse Lennox. The model gives Villefort a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.