UFC - Ultimate Ultimate '96: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, December 7, 1996·Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Published April 25, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC - Ultimate Ultimate '96 lands on Saturday, December 7, 1996 in Birmingham, Alabama, USA with 10 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Don Frye vs David AbbottOpen WeightDon FryeConfident70%
David Abbott vs Steve NelmarkOpen WeightDavid AbbottConfident67%
Don Frye vs Mark HallOpen WeightDon FryeStrong89%
Ken Shamrock vs Brian JohnstonOpen WeightKen ShamrockConfident71%
Kimo Leopoldo vs Paul VarelansOpen WeightKimo LeopoldoLean60%
David Abbott vs Cal WorshamOpen WeightDavid AbbottStrong79%
Don Frye vs Gary GoodridgeOpen WeightDon FryeStrong82%
Tai Bowden vs Jack NilsonOpen WeightTai BowdenConfident74%
Steve Nelmark vs Marcus BossettOpen WeightSteve NelmarkStrong81%
Mark Hall vs Felix Lee MitchellOpen WeightMark HallStrong88%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Don Frye vs David Abbott

Open Weight
70%
Don Frye
Frye
9-1
CO-II1461
Striker
VS
Abbott
8-10
PR-I888
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderUnder 72%
Under 72%Over 28%

The Open Weight matchup features Don Frye (9-1) taking on David Abbott (8-10).

Frye is rated at 1461 — 574 points above Abbott's 888. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Frye's striker game against Abbott's submission artist approach. Frye brings a versatile approach, while Abbott is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Frye throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Frye is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.2 more per 15 minutes. Frye has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Don Frye over David Abbott. We're leaning Frye here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

67%
David Abbott
Abbott
8-10
PR-I888
Knockout Artist
VS
Nelmark
2-1
RK-III1002
Over/UnderUnder 81%
Under 81%Over 19%

The Open Weight matchup features David Abbott (8-10) taking on Steve Nelmark (2-1).

There's a real Elo separation here: Nelmark at 1002 versus Abbott at 888. That 115-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nelmark throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Nelmark is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.1 more per 15 minutes. Abbott has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: David Abbott over Steve Nelmark. We're leaning Abbott here at 67%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Don Frye vs Mark Hall

Open Weight
89%
Don Frye
Frye
9-1
CO-II1461
Striker
VS
Hall
4-3
RK-II1119
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderUnder 67%
Under 67%Over 33%

The Open Weight matchup features Don Frye (9-1) taking on Mark Hall (4-3).

Frye is rated at 1461 — 343 points above Hall's 1119. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Knockout Artist" archetype — precision strikers who sit back, pick their shots, and carry fight-ending power. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Frye throws significantly more leather — a 2.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Frye is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Frye has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Don Frye over Mark Hall. The model is firm on this one: Frye at 89%.

71%
Ken Shamrock
Shamrock
6-5
CO-III1231
Submission Artist
VS
Johnston
2-4
MC-I981
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderUnder 67%
Under 67%Over 33%

The Open Weight matchup features Ken Shamrock (6-5) taking on Brian Johnston (2-4).

Shamrock is rated at 1231 — 250 points above Johnston's 981. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Shamrock's submission artist game against Johnston's knockout artist approach. Shamrock is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Johnston is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Johnston throws significantly more leather — a 0.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Johnston is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.9 more per 15 minutes. Shamrock has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ken Shamrock over Brian Johnston. We're leaning Shamrock here at 71%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

60%
Kimo Leopoldo
Leopoldo
2-4
RK-II1100
Submission Artist
VS
Varelans
4-4
MC-I985
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderUnder 64%
Under 64%Over 36%

The Open Weight matchup features Kimo Leopoldo (2-4) taking on Paul Varelans (4-4).

There's a real Elo separation here: Leopoldo at 1100 versus Varelans at 985. That 116-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Leopoldo's submission artist game against Varelans's knockout artist approach. Leopoldo is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Varelans is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Leopoldo throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Leopoldo is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.5 more per 15 minutes. Leopoldo has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Kimo Leopoldo over Paul Varelans. The model gives Leopoldo a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

79%
David Abbott
Abbott
8-10
PR-I888
Knockout Artist
VS
Worsham
1-2
MC-II962
Over/UnderUnder 64%
Under 64%Over 36%

The Open Weight matchup features David Abbott (8-10) taking on Cal Worsham (1-2).

Worsham carries a modest Elo edge (962 to 888), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Worsham throws significantly more leather — a 0.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Worsham is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Worsham has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: David Abbott over Cal Worsham. The model is firm on this one: Abbott at 79%.

Don Frye vs Gary Goodridge

Open Weight
82%
Don Frye
Frye
9-1
CO-II1461
Striker
VS
Goodridge
4-4
RK-I1198
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 69%
Under 69%Over 31%

The Open Weight matchup features Don Frye (9-1) taking on Gary Goodridge (4-4).

Frye is rated at 1461 — 263 points above Goodridge's 1198. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Knockout Artist" archetype — precision strikers who sit back, pick their shots, and carry fight-ending power. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Frye throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Goodridge is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Goodridge has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Don Frye over Gary Goodridge. The model is firm on this one: Frye at 82%.

Tai Bowden vs Jack Nilson

Open Weight
74%
Tai Bowden
Bowden
1-1
RK-II1096
VS
Nilson
1-1
RK-III1034
Over/UnderUnder 82%
Under 82%Over 18%

The Open Weight matchup features Tai Bowden (1-1) taking on Jack Nilson (1-1).

Bowden carries a modest Elo edge (1096 to 1034), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

A few statistical edges stand out. Bowden throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Nilson is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Nilson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Tai Bowden over Jack Nilson. We're leaning Bowden here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

81%
Steve Nelmark
Nelmark
2-1
RK-III1002
VS
Bossett
1-2
PR-I890
Over/UnderUnder 76%
Under 76%Over 24%

The Open Weight matchup features Steve Nelmark (2-1) taking on Marcus Bossett (1-2).

There's a real Elo separation here: Nelmark at 1002 versus Bossett at 890. That 112-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

A few statistical edges stand out. Nelmark throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Nelmark is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.5 more per 15 minutes. Bossett has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Steve Nelmark over Marcus Bossett. The model is firm on this one: Nelmark at 81%.

88%
Mark Hall
Hall
4-3
RK-II1119
Knockout Artist
VS
Mitchell
0-3
UC-I746
Over/UnderUnder 74%
Under 74%Over 26%

The Open Weight matchup features Mark Hall (4-3) taking on Felix Lee Mitchell (0-3).

Hall is rated at 1119 — 373 points above Mitchell's 746. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hall throws significantly more leather — a 0.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Mitchell is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Hall has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Mark Hall over Felix Lee Mitchell. The model is firm on this one: Hall at 88%.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.