UFC Fight Night: Della Maddalena vs. Prates: Predictions & Analysis
UFC Fight Night: Della Maddalena vs. Prates lands on Saturday, May 2, 2026 in Perth, Western Australia, Australia with 7 bouts on the card. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.
Quick Picks
| Matchup | Pick | Confidence | Prob |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Della Maddalena vs Carlos PratesWelterweight | Jack Della Maddalena | Confident | 65% |
| Beneil Dariush vs Quillan SalkilldLightweight | Quillan Salkilld | Confident | 70% |
| Tai Tuivasa vs Sean SharafHeavyweight | Tai Tuivasa | Lean | 58% |
| Junior Tafa vs Kevin ChristianLight Heavyweight | Junior Tafa | Lean | 59% |
| Cam Rowston vs Robert BryczekMiddleweight | Cam Rowston | Confident | 70% |
| Jacob Malkoun vs Gerald MeerschaertMiddleweight | Jacob Malkoun | Strong | 76% |
| Steve Erceg vs Tim ElliottFlyweight | Steve Erceg | Lean | 59% |
Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings
Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook
Bet Now on DraftKingsFight-by-Fight Breakdown
Jack Della Maddalena vs Carlos Prates
The Welterweight matchup features Jack Della Maddalena (8-1-1) taking on Carlos Prates (6-1-1). Prates is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 5-inch reach advantage.
The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Maddalena at 1939, Prates at 1941. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.
Stylistically this is Maddalena's brawler game against Prates's knockout artist approach. Maddalena pushes forward relentlessly, throwing volume and pressuring opponents against the cage, while Prates is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.
A few statistical edges stand out. Maddalena throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Prates is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Maddalena has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Jack Della Maddalena over Carlos Prates. We're leaning Maddalena here at 65%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.
Beneil Dariush vs Quillan Salkilld
The Lightweight matchup features Beneil Dariush (17-7-2) taking on Quillan Salkilld (4-0-1). Salkilld is the bigger frame at 6'0" with a 3-inch reach advantage.
The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Dariush at 1557, Salkilld at 1553. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets. Salkilld has won 4 straight.
A few statistical edges stand out. Salkilld throws significantly more leather — a 1.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Salkilld is far more active with takedowns, averaging 5.1 more per 15 minutes. Dariush has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Quillan Salkilld over Beneil Dariush. We're leaning Salkilld here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.
Tai Tuivasa vs Sean Sharaf
The Heavyweight matchup features Tai Tuivasa (8-9-1) taking on Sean Sharaf (0-2-1).
Tuivasa is rated at 1306 — 601 points above Sharaf's 705. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
A few statistical edges stand out. Sharaf throws significantly more leather — a 4.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Sharaf is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.9 more per 15 minutes. Sharaf has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Tai Tuivasa over Sean Sharaf. The model gives Tuivasa a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.
Junior Tafa vs Kevin Christian
The Light Heavyweight matchup features Junior Tafa (2-5-1) taking on Kevin Christian (0-1-1). Christian is the bigger frame at 6'7" with a 5-inch reach advantage.
Christian carries a modest Elo edge (872 to 801), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.
A few statistical edges stand out. Tafa throws significantly more leather — a 0.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Christian is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Tafa has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Junior Tafa over Kevin Christian. The model gives Tafa a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.
Cam Rowston vs Robert Bryczek
The Middleweight matchup features Cam Rowston (2-0-1) taking on Robert Bryczek (1-1-1). Rowston is the bigger frame at 6'3" with a 3-inch reach advantage.
There's a real Elo separation here: Rowston at 1302 versus Bryczek at 1197. That 105-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.
A few statistical edges stand out. Rowston throws significantly more leather — a 2.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Bryczek is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Bryczek has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Cam Rowston over Robert Bryczek. We're leaning Rowston here at 70%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.
Jacob Malkoun vs Gerald Meerschaert
The Middleweight matchup features Jacob Malkoun (5-3-1) taking on Gerald Meerschaert (12-13-1). Meerschaert is the bigger frame at 6'1" with a 4-inch reach advantage.
Malkoun is rated at 1337 — 315 points above Meerschaert's 1022. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.
Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.
A few statistical edges stand out. Malkoun throws significantly more leather — a 2.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Malkoun is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.8 more per 15 minutes. Malkoun has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Jacob Malkoun over Gerald Meerschaert. The model is firm on this one: Malkoun at 76%.
Steve Erceg vs Tim Elliott
The Flyweight matchup features Steve Erceg (4-3-1) taking on Tim Elliott (10-11-1).
The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Erceg at 1245, Elliott at 1233. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.
The style clash matters here: Erceg pushes forward relentlessly, throwing volume and pressuring opponents against the cage, while Elliott looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 57% win rate against brawlers, giving Elliott the stylistic edge.
A few statistical edges stand out. Erceg throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Elliott is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Elliott has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.
The Pick: Steve Erceg over Tim Elliott. The model gives Erceg a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.
Methodology
Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.
On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.