UFC Fight Night: Hermansson vs. Pyfer: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, February 10, 2024·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Published April 18, 2026
Predictions are for entertainment purposes only and do not constitute financial advice. Please gamble responsibly.

UFC Fight Night: Hermansson vs. Pyfer lands on Saturday, February 10, 2024 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 14 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by a championship fight. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Jack Hermansson vs Joe PyferMiddleweightJoe PyferStrong84%
Dan Ige vs Andre FiliFeatherweightDan IgeLean60%
Ihor Potieria vs Robert BryczekMiddleweightIhor PotieriaToss-up50%
Gregory Rodrigues vs Brad TavaresMiddleweightGregory RodriguesConfident66%
Michael Johnson vs Darrius FlowersLightweightMichael JohnsonLean61%
Rodolfo Vieira vs Armen PetrosyanMiddleweightArmen PetrosyanToss-up51%
Carlos Prates vs Trevin GilesWelterweightCarlos PratesConfident71%
Bolaji Oki vs Timmy CuambaLightweightTimmy CuambaLean60%
Loma Lookboonmee vs Bruna BrasilWomen's StrawweightLoma LookboonmeeConfident69%
Marcin Prachnio vs Devin ClarkLight HeavyweightDevin ClarkToss-up53%
Max Griffin vs Jeremiah WellsWelterweightJeremiah WellsLean58%
Bogdan Guskov vs Zac PaugaLight HeavyweightBogdan GuskovToss-up51%
Hyder Amil vs Fernie GarciaFeatherweightHyder AmilToss-up50%
Daniel Marcos vs AoriqilengBantamweightDaniel MarcosLean56%

Like these picks? Bet on DraftKings

Place your bets on the fights above at DraftKings Sportsbook

Bet Now on DraftKings

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Jack Hermansson vs Joe Pyfer

MiddleweightTitle Fight
84%
Joe Pyfer
Hermansson
11-8
CO-III1299
All-Rounder
VS
Pyfer
7-1
CH-II1795
Knockout Artist
Over/UnderOver 62%
Under 38%Over 62%

The Middleweight championship matchup features Jack Hermansson (11-8) taking on Joe Pyfer (7-1).

Pyfer is rated at 1795 — 496 points above Hermansson's 1299. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Pyfer has won 3 straight.

Stylistically this is Hermansson's all-rounder game against Pyfer's knockout artist approach. Hermansson is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Pyfer is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Hermansson throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Pyfer is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Pyfer has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Joe Pyfer over Jack Hermansson. The model is firm on this one: Pyfer at 84%. The market implies 31% for Hermansson, but our model sees only 16%. That 16-point gap favoring Pyfer is worth watching.

Dan Ige vs Andre Fili

Featherweight
60%
Dan Ige
Ige
11-10
CO-II1343
All-Rounder
VS
Fili
13-12
RK-I1176
Striker
Over/UnderOver 59%
Under 41%Over 59%

The Featherweight matchup features Dan Ige (11-10) taking on Andre Fili (13-12). Fili is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Ige is rated at 1343 — 168 points above Fili's 1176. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Fili throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Fili is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Ige has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Dan Ige over Andre Fili. The model gives Ige a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

50%
Ihor Potieria
Potieria
2-6
PR-III820
Striker
VS
Bryczek
1-1
RK-I1170
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Middleweight matchup features Ihor Potieria (2-6) taking on Robert Bryczek (1-1). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Potieria.

Bryczek is rated at 1170 — 350 points above Potieria's 820. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Potieria throws significantly more leather — a 5.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Bryczek is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Bryczek has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Ihor Potieria over Robert Bryczek. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Potieria at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. Notably, the betting market has Potieria at 37% implied while our model sees 50% — a 13-point disagreement that could signal value.

66%
Gregory Rodrigues
Rodrigues
10-3
CH-III1649
All-Rounder
VS
Tavares
16-12
RK-III1023
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 54%
Under 54%Over 46%

The Middleweight matchup features Gregory Rodrigues (10-3) taking on Brad Tavares (16-12).

Rodrigues is rated at 1649 — 626 points above Tavares's 1023. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

The style clash matters here: Rodrigues is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings, while Tavares brings a versatile approach. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Rodrigues the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rodrigues throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Rodrigues is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.0 more per 15 minutes. Tavares has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Gregory Rodrigues over Brad Tavares. We're leaning Rodrigues here at 66%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

61%
Michael Johnson
Johnson
16-16
RK-I1155
Striker
VS
Flowers
1-3
RK-III1037
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Lightweight matchup features Michael Johnson (16-16) taking on Darrius Flowers (1-3).

There's a real Elo separation here: Johnson at 1155 versus Flowers at 1037. That 118-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results. Johnson rides a 3-fight win streak into this one.

A few statistical edges stand out. Flowers throws significantly more leather — a 0.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Flowers is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Johnson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Michael Johnson over Darrius Flowers. The model gives Johnson a slight nod at 61% — this could easily go either way. Notably, the betting market has Johnson at 57% implied while our model sees 61% — a 4-point disagreement that could signal value.

51%
Armen Petrosyan
Vieira
6-4
RK-I1154
Wrestler
VS
Petrosyan
3-4
MC-I994
Striker
Over/UnderOver 54%
Under 46%Over 54%

The Middleweight matchup features Rodolfo Vieira (6-4) taking on Armen Petrosyan (3-4). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Petrosyan.

Vieira is rated at 1154 — 160 points above Petrosyan's 994. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Vieira's wrestler game against Petrosyan's striker approach. Vieira looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Petrosyan brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Petrosyan throws significantly more leather — a 2.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Vieira is far more active with takedowns, averaging 3.2 more per 15 minutes. Petrosyan has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Armen Petrosyan over Rodolfo Vieira. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Petrosyan at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

71%
Carlos Prates
Prates
6-1
CH-I1941
Striker
VS
Giles
7-7
MC-III929
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Welterweight matchup features Carlos Prates (6-1) taking on Trevin Giles (7-7). Prates will look to use a 4-inch reach edge to control distance.

Prates is rated at 1941 — 1012 points above Giles's 929. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Prates's striker game against Giles's all-rounder approach. Prates brings a versatile approach, while Giles is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Giles throws significantly more leather — a 2.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Giles is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. Prates has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Carlos Prates over Trevin Giles. We're leaning Prates here at 71%, a solid but not overwhelming edge. The market and our model are aligned — the line looks fair.

Bolaji Oki vs Timmy Cuamba

Lightweight
60%
Timmy Cuamba
Oki
2-3
PR-III818
VS
Cuamba
2-2
CO-III1227
Over/UnderOver 55%
Under 45%Over 55%

The Lightweight matchup features Bolaji Oki (2-3) taking on Timmy Cuamba (2-2).

Cuamba is rated at 1227 — 408 points above Oki's 818. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Cuamba throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Cuamba is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.0 more per 15 minutes. Cuamba has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Timmy Cuamba over Bolaji Oki. The model gives Cuamba a slight nod at 60% — this could easily go either way.

Loma Lookboonmee vs Bruna Brasil

Women's Strawweight
69%
Loma Lookboonmee
Lookboonmee
7-3
RK-II1097
All-Rounder
VS
Brasil
3-5
MC-II960
All-Rounder
Over/UnderOver 58%
Under 42%Over 58%

The Women's Strawweight matchup features Loma Lookboonmee (7-3) taking on Bruna Brasil (3-5). Brasil is the bigger frame at 5'6" with a 4-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Lookboonmee at 1097 versus Brasil at 960. That 137-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results. Lookboonmee rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Lookboonmee looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Brasil is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 58% win rate against all-rounders, giving Lookboonmee the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Lookboonmee throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Lookboonmee is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Brasil has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Loma Lookboonmee over Bruna Brasil. We're leaning Lookboonmee here at 69%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Marcin Prachnio vs Devin Clark

Light Heavyweight
53%
Devin Clark
Prachnio
4-7
PR-II848
Striker
VS
Clark
8-9
RK-II1073
Striker
Over/UnderUnder 58%
Under 58%Over 42%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Marcin Prachnio (4-7) taking on Devin Clark (8-9). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Prachnio.

Clark is rated at 1073 — 225 points above Prachnio's 848. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Prachnio throws significantly more leather — a 3.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Clark is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.7 more per 15 minutes. Prachnio has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Devin Clark over Marcin Prachnio. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Clark at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

58%
Jeremiah Wells
Griffin
8-10
CO-III1276
Striker
VS
Wells
5-2
CO-II1369
Wrestler
Over/UnderOver 51%
Under 49%Over 51%

The Welterweight matchup features Max Griffin (8-10) taking on Jeremiah Wells (5-2). Griffin is the bigger frame at 5'11" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

There's a real Elo separation here: Wells at 1369 versus Griffin at 1276. That 92-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

The style clash matters here: Griffin brings a versatile approach, while Wells is patient on the feet, timing counters and loading up when he sees openings. In our database, knockout artists own a 56% win rate against strikers, giving Wells the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Griffin throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Wells is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.9 more per 15 minutes. Griffin has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Jeremiah Wells over Max Griffin. The model gives Wells a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Bogdan Guskov vs Zac Pauga

Light Heavyweight
51%
Bogdan Guskov
Guskov
4-1-1
CO-I1594
Knockout Artist
VS
Pauga
1-3
UC-II687
Over/UnderUnder 57%
Under 57%Over 43%

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Bogdan Guskov (4-1-1) taking on Zac Pauga (1-3).

Guskov is rated at 1594 — 907 points above Pauga's 687. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pauga throws significantly more leather — a 2.3 sig. strike per minute gap. Pauga is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.4 more per 15 minutes. Pauga has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Bogdan Guskov over Zac Pauga. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Guskov at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Hyder Amil vs Fernie Garcia

Featherweight
50%
Hyder Amil
Amil
3-2
RK-III1021
VS
Garcia
0-4
UC-III634
Over/UnderOver 62%
Under 38%Over 62%

The Featherweight matchup features Hyder Amil (3-2) taking on Fernie Garcia (0-4). Amil is the bigger frame at 5'9" with a 3-inch reach advantage.

Amil is rated at 1021 — 388 points above Garcia's 634. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

A few statistical edges stand out. Garcia throws significantly more leather — a 1.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Garcia is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Amil has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Hyder Amil over Fernie Garcia. This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Amil at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Daniel Marcos vs Aoriqileng

Bantamweight
56%
Daniel Marcos
Marcos
5-1
CO-II1452
Striker
VS
Aoriqileng
4-4
RK-I1137
Striker
Over/UnderOver 56%
Under 44%Over 56%

The Bantamweight matchup features Daniel Marcos (5-1) taking on Aoriqileng (4-4).

Marcos is rated at 1452 — 316 points above Aoriqileng's 1137. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "Striker" archetype — fighters with a well-rounded skill set. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Aoriqileng throws significantly more leather — a 0.0 sig. strike per minute gap. Aoriqileng is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Marcos has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

The Pick: Daniel Marcos over Aoriqileng. The model gives Marcos a slight nod at 56% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.