UFC 296: Edwards vs. Covington: Predictions & Analysis

Saturday, December 16, 2023·Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

UFC 296: Edwards vs. Covington lands on Saturday, December 16, 2023 in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA with 12 bouts on the card. The card is headlined by 2 title bouts. Below is our fight-by-fight breakdown, combining Elo ratings, rolling statistical trends, style matchup data, and betting market context into a pick for every bout.

Quick Picks

MatchupPickConfidenceProb
Leon Edwards vs Colby CovingtonWelterweightLeon EdwardsConfident74%
Alexandre Pantoja vs Brandon RoyvalFlyweightAlexandre PantojaLean59%
Shavkat Rakhmonov vs Stephen ThompsonWelterweightShavkat RakhmonovStrong80%
Paddy Pimblett vs Tony FergusonLightweightPaddy PimblettConfident74%
Josh Emmett vs Bryce MitchellFeatherweightBryce MitchellConfident68%
Alonzo Menifield vs Dustin JacobyLight HeavyweightDustin JacobyToss-up55%
Irene Aldana vs Karol RosaWomen's BantamweightIrene AldanaToss-up50%
Cody Garbrandt vs Brian KelleherBantamweightCody GarbrandtToss-up53%
Ariane da Silva vs Casey O'NeillWomen's FlyweightCasey O'NeillToss-up54%
Tagir Ulanbekov vs Cody DurdenFlyweightCody DurdenLean58%
Andre Fili vs Lucas AlmeidaFeatherweightAndre FiliToss-up51%
Shamil Gaziev vs Martin BudayHeavyweightMartin BudayLean62%

Fight-by-Fight Breakdown

Leon Edwards vs Colby Covington

WelterweightTitle Fight
74%
Leon Edwards
Edwards
14-4
Elo 1596
All-Rounder
VS
Covington
12-4
Elo 1630
Wrestler

The Welterweight championship matchup features Leon Edwards (14-4) taking on Colby Covington (12-4). Edwards is the bigger frame at 6'2" with a 2-inch reach advantage.

Covington carries a modest Elo edge (1630 to 1596), the kind of gap that reflects a slightly better run of form rather than a talent chasm.

The style clash matters here: Edwards is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Covington looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Covington the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Covington throws significantly more leather — a 1.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Covington is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.2 more per 15 minutes. Covington has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Leon Edwards over Colby Covington.** We're leaning Edwards here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Alexandre Pantoja vs Brandon Royval

FlyweightTitle Fight
59%
Alexandre Pantoja
Pantoja
14-3
Elo 1497
Wrestler
VS
Royval
7-4
Elo 1314
Knockout Artist

The Flyweight championship matchup features Alexandre Pantoja (14-3) taking on Brandon Royval (7-4). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Royval.

Pantoja is rated at 1497 — 183 points above Royval's 1314. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Pantoja rides a 8-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Pantoja looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Royval is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks. In our database, wrestlers own a 56% win rate against submission artists, giving Pantoja the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pantoja throws significantly more leather — a 0.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Pantoja is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.1 more per 15 minutes. Royval has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Alexandre Pantoja over Brandon Royval.** The model gives Pantoja a slight nod at 59% — this could easily go either way.

80%
Shavkat Rakhmonov
Rakhmonov
6-0
Elo 1831
Wrestler
VS
Thompson
12-8-1
Elo 1329
Striker

The Welterweight matchup features Shavkat Rakhmonov (6-0) taking on Stephen Thompson (12-8-1).

Rakhmonov is rated at 1831 — 503 points above Thompson's 1329. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Rakhmonov rides a 6-fight win streak into this one.

Stylistically this is Rakhmonov's wrestler game against Thompson's striker approach. Rakhmonov looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Thompson brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Thompson throws significantly more leather — a 1.2 sig. strike per minute gap. Rakhmonov is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.5 more per 15 minutes. Rakhmonov has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Shavkat Rakhmonov over Stephen Thompson.** The model is firm on this one: Rakhmonov at 80%.

74%
Paddy Pimblett
Pimblett
7-0
Elo 1568
Wrestler
VS
Ferguson
15-8
Elo 1065
All-Rounder

The Lightweight matchup features Paddy Pimblett (7-0) taking on Tony Ferguson (15-8). Ferguson will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Pimblett is rated at 1568 — 503 points above Ferguson's 1065. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Pimblett rides a 7-fight win streak into this one.

The style clash matters here: Pimblett looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat, while Ferguson is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. In our database, wrestlers own a 59% win rate against all-rounders, giving Pimblett the stylistic edge.

A few statistical edges stand out. Pimblett throws significantly more leather — a 1.4 sig. strike per minute gap. Pimblett is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.8 more per 15 minutes. Ferguson has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Paddy Pimblett over Tony Ferguson.** We're leaning Pimblett here at 74%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Josh Emmett vs Bryce Mitchell

Featherweight
68%
Bryce Mitchell
Emmett
10-5
Elo 1356
Striker
VS
Mitchell
8-3
Elo 1355
Wrestler

The Featherweight matchup features Josh Emmett (10-5) taking on Bryce Mitchell (8-3). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Mitchell.

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Emmett at 1356, Mitchell at 1355. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

Stylistically this is Emmett's striker game against Mitchell's wrestler approach. Emmett brings a versatile approach, while Mitchell looks to close distance and put the fight on the mat. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Emmett throws significantly more leather — a 1.9 sig. strike per minute gap. Mitchell is far more active with takedowns, averaging 4.1 more per 15 minutes. Mitchell has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Bryce Mitchell over Josh Emmett.** We're leaning Mitchell here at 68%, a solid but not overwhelming edge.

Alonzo Menifield vs Dustin Jacoby

Light Heavyweight
55%
Dustin Jacoby
Menifield
10-5-1
Elo 1207
All-Rounder
VS
Jacoby
9-6-1
Elo 1374
Striker

The Light Heavyweight matchup features Alonzo Menifield (10-5-1) taking on Dustin Jacoby (9-6-1). There's a 3-inch height gap favoring Jacoby.

Jacoby is rated at 1374 — 166 points above Menifield's 1207. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Menifield's submission artist game against Jacoby's striker approach. Menifield is most dangerous on the ground, constantly threatening chokes and joint locks, while Jacoby brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Jacoby throws significantly more leather — a 2.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Menifield is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.1 more per 15 minutes. Jacoby has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Dustin Jacoby over Alonzo Menifield.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Jacoby at 55%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Irene Aldana vs Karol Rosa

Women's Bantamweight
50%
Irene Aldana
Aldana
8-5
Elo 1331
All-Rounder
VS
Rosa
7-4
Elo 1201
Striker

The Women's Bantamweight matchup features Irene Aldana (8-5) taking on Karol Rosa (7-4). There's a 4-inch height gap favoring Aldana.

There's a real Elo separation here: Aldana at 1331 versus Rosa at 1201. That 130-point gap typically reflects a meaningful difference in recent quality of competition and results.

Stylistically this is Aldana's all-rounder game against Rosa's striker approach. Aldana is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Rosa brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Rosa throws significantly more leather — a 1.1 sig. strike per minute gap. Rosa is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.0 more per 15 minutes. Aldana has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Irene Aldana over Karol Rosa.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Aldana at 50%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

53%
Cody Garbrandt
Garbrandt
9-6
Elo 1155
Striker
VS
Kelleher
8-8
Elo 766
Wrestler

The Bantamweight matchup features Cody Garbrandt (9-6) taking on Brian Kelleher (8-8).

Garbrandt is rated at 1155 — 389 points above Kelleher's 766. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Garbrandt's striker game against Kelleher's all-rounder approach. Garbrandt brings a versatile approach, while Kelleher is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Garbrandt throws significantly more leather — a 0.6 sig. strike per minute gap. Kelleher is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.4 more per 15 minutes. Kelleher has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Cody Garbrandt over Brian Kelleher.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Garbrandt at 53%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

Ariane da Silva vs Casey O'Neill

Women's Flyweight
54%
Casey O'Neill
Silva
6-7
Elo 976
Knockout Artist
VS
O'Neill
4-2
Elo 1172
All-Rounder

The Women's Flyweight matchup features Ariane da Silva (6-7) taking on Casey O'Neill (4-2).

O'Neill is rated at 1172 — 196 points above Silva's 976. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Both fighters land in our "All-Rounder" archetype — fighters comfortable everywhere, able to strike or grapple depending on what the opponent gives them. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. O'Neill throws significantly more leather — a 3.9 sig. strike per minute gap. O'Neill is far more active with takedowns, averaging 1.1 more per 15 minutes. O'Neill has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Casey O'Neill over Ariane da Silva.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward O'Neill at 54%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

58%
Cody Durden
Ulanbekov
6-1
Elo 1261
Wrestler
VS
Durden
6-6-1
Elo 846
Knockout Artist

The Flyweight matchup features Tagir Ulanbekov (6-1) taking on Cody Durden (6-6-1). Ulanbekov will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Ulanbekov is rated at 1261 — 415 points above Durden's 846. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents. Ulanbekov rides a 4-fight win streak into this one.

Both fighters land in our "Wrestler" archetype — fighters who win by dictating where the fight takes place, grinding out control time and wearing opponents down. When mirror matchups like this happen, the edge usually goes to whoever can impose their preferred pace and range.

A few statistical edges stand out. Ulanbekov throws significantly more leather — a 0.5 sig. strike per minute gap. Durden is far more active with takedowns, averaging 2.6 more per 15 minutes. Durden has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Cody Durden over Tagir Ulanbekov.** The model gives Durden a slight nod at 58% — this could easily go either way.

Andre Fili vs Lucas Almeida

Featherweight
51%
Andre Fili
Fili
12-11
Elo 1140
Striker
VS
Almeida
2-3
Elo 806
Striker

The Featherweight matchup features Andre Fili (12-11) taking on Lucas Almeida (2-3). Fili will look to use a 3-inch reach edge to control distance.

Fili is rated at 1140 — 334 points above Almeida's 806. Gaps this large usually mean one fighter has been consistently beating better opponents.

Stylistically this is Fili's all-rounder game against Almeida's striker approach. Fili is comfortable adjusting on the fly, mixing strikes and grappling as openings appear, while Almeida brings a versatile approach. Historically these archetypes are dead-even when they collide.

A few statistical edges stand out. Almeida throws significantly more leather — a 0.8 sig. strike per minute gap. Fili is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.6 more per 15 minutes. Fili has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Andre Fili over Lucas Almeida.** This is essentially a pick'em. The model nudges toward Fili at 51%, but there's almost nothing separating these two.

62%
Martin Buday
Gaziev
3-1
Elo 1209
VS
Buday
6-1
Elo 1183
All-Rounder

The Heavyweight matchup features Shamil Gaziev (3-1) taking on Martin Buday (6-1).

The Elo gap here is razor-thin — Gaziev at 1209, Buday at 1183. On paper, this is as close to a coin flip as it gets.

A few statistical edges stand out. Buday throws significantly more leather — a 5.7 sig. strike per minute gap. Buday is far more active with takedowns, averaging 0.3 more per 15 minutes. Gaziev has tighter striking defense, making opponents miss more often.

**The Pick: Martin Buday over Shamil Gaziev.** The model gives Buday a slight nod at 62% — this could easily go either way.

Methodology

Predictions are generated by our ensemble model combining LightGBM (65%) and CatBoost (35%), trained on every UFC fight since 1994. The model uses 23 features including Elo ratings, rolling 5-fight statistical averages, style matchup history, physical attributes, and market odds when available.

On our held-out test set (402 fights from January-September 2023), the model achieves 63.4% accuracy with a log-loss of 0.626. High-confidence picks (>75% probability) hit at 82.7%. For full model transparency, visit our Model page.